IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La pauvreté en Espagne, en France, aux Pays-Bas et au Royaume-Uni

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Chambaz
  • Éric Maurin

Abstract

[eng] Poverty in Spain, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom A Method for International Poverty Level Comparisons . International poverty level comparisons are normally highly sensitive to the conventions used to identify poor households or to switch from the measurement of income to the measurement of standards of living. The results of comparisons may therefore vary a great deal depending on the choice of poverty line, equivalence scale and poverty measurement indicator. . However, more qualitative criteria can be devised to rank the countries by poverty when the gaps between them cannot be accurately measured. These criteria are derived from an adaptation and extension of the sequential criterion introduced by Atkinson and Bourguignon (1987). Application of these criteria to the recent European Panel data suggests the only robust finding to be that the distribution of income generates less poverty in France than in the United Kingdom and less in the United Kingdom than in the Netherlands. However, no finding ranking Spain against France, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands is insensitive to the different convention choices. [spa] La pobreza en Espaha, en Francia, en los Pais es Bajos y en el Reino Unido Un método para las comparaciones internacionales de nivel de pobreza . Las comparaciones internacionales de nivel de pobreza suelen ser muy sensibles a las convenciones que se escogen para identificar a los hogares pobres o para pasar de la mediciôn de los salarios a la de los nivelés de vida. Los resultados de las comparaciones pueden variar mucho segûn que umbral de pobreza, que escala de equivalencia, y que indicador de mediciôn de la pobreza, se escogen. Es sin embargo posible establecer criterios mâs cualitativos que permitan clasificar los paîses segûn la pobreza, a falta de una mediciôn précisa de las diferencias existentes entre ellos. Dichos criterios son el resultado de una adaptaciôn y de una extension del criterio secuencial introducido por Atkinson y Bourguignon (1987). . Cuando se aplican estos criterios a los datos del reciente Panel europeo, résulta que el ûnico diagnôstico robusto es el de que la distribuciôn de las rentas genera menos pobreza en Francia que en el Reino Unido y menos en el Reino Unido que en los Pai'ses Bajos. En cambio, tratândose de Espana, no hay diagnôstico situândola respecto a Francia, al Reino Unido y a los Pafses Bajos, que no se résista a los diferentes cambios de convenciones posibles. [ger] Armut in Spanien, in Frankreich, in den Niederianden und im Vereinigten Kônigreich Ein Verfahren fur internationale Vergieiche des Grads der Armut . In der Regel hàngen internationale Vergieiche des Grads der Armut in hohem MaBe von den Konventionen ab, die zur Identifizierung der armen Haushalte oder fur den Ùbergang von der Messung der Einkommen zur Messung des Lebensstandards gewàhlt werden. Somit kônnen sich die Ergebnisse der Vergieiche je nach der Wahl der Armutsgrenze, der Àquivalenzskala oder des Indikators der Armutsmessung sehr voneinander unterscheiden. Es ist jedoch môglich, qualitativere Kriterienzu erstellen, die eine Einstufung der Lânder je nach Armut in Ermangelung einer genauen Messung der zwischen ihnen bestehenden Unterschiede ermôglichen. Diese Kriterien ergeben siçh aus einer Anpassung und einer Ausweitung des von Atkinson . und Bourguignon (1987) eingefûhrten sequentiellen Kriteriums. . Aus der Anwendung dieser Kriterien auf die Daten des jûngsten europàischen Panels geht hervor, daB die einzige stichhaltige Diagnose diejenige ist, der zufolge die Verteilung der Einkommen in Frankreich weniger Armut als imVereinigten Kônigreich und im Vereinigten Kônigreich weniger Armut als in den Niederianden verursacht. Im Falle Spaniens halt jedoch keine Diagnose, die dieses Land im Verhâltnis zu Frankreich, zum Vereinigten Kônigreich oder zu den Niederianden einstuft, der Heranziehung der verschiedenen môglichen Konventionen stand. [fre] La pauvreté en Espagne, en France, aux Pays-Bas et au Royaume-Uni Une méthode pour les comparaisons internationales de niveau de pauvreté . Les comparaisons internationales de niveau de pauvreté sont en règle générale très sensibles aux conventions retenues pour identifier les ménages pauvres ou pour passer de la mesure des revenus à celles des niveaux de vie. Les résultats des comparaisons peuvent ainsi varier beaucoup selon le choix du seuil de pauvreté, de l'échelle d'équivalence, ou de l'indicateur de mesure de la pauvreté. Il est cependant possible de construire des critères plus qualitatifs permettant de classer les pays selon la pauvreté à défaut de donner une mesure précise des écarts existant entre eux. Ces critères résultent d'une adaptation et et d'une extension du critère séquentiel introduit par Atkinson et Bourguignon (1987). . En appliquant ces critères aux données du récent Panel européen, il apparaît que le seul diagnostic robuste est celui selon lequel la distribution des revenus génère moins de pauvreté en France qu'au Royaume-Uni et moins au Royaume-Uni qu'aux Pays-Bas. En revanche, s'agissant de l'Espagne, aucun diagnostic qui la situe par rapport à la France, au Royaume-Uni ou aux Pays-Bas, ne résiste aux différents changements de conventions envisageables.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Chambaz & Éric Maurin, 1998. "La pauvreté en Espagne, en France, aux Pays-Bas et au Royaume-Uni," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 308(1), pages 229-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2601
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1998.2601
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1998.2601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1998.2601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1998.2601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atkinson, A B, 1987. "On the Measurement of Poverty," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 749-764, July.
    2. Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-766, May.
    3. Bourguignon, Francois, 1989. "Family size and social utility : Income distribution dominance criteria," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 67-80, September.
    4. John A. Bishop & John P. Formby & W. James Smith, 1993. "International Comparisons of Welfare and Poverty: Dominance Orderings for Ten Countries," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 26(3), pages 707-726, August.
    5. Atkinson, A B, 1992. "Measuring Poverty and Differences in Family Composition," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 59(233), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Anthony B. Atkinson & François Bourguignon, 1987. "Income Distribution and Differences in Needs," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: George R. Feiwel (ed.), Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, chapter 12, pages 350-370, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Foster, James E & Shorrocks, Anthony F, 1988. "Poverty Orderings," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 173-177, January.
    8. Clark, Stephen & Hemming, Richard & Ulph, David, 1981. "On Indices for the Measurement of Poverty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 91(362), pages 515-526, June.
    9. Brigitte Buhmann & Lee Rainwater & Guenther Schmaus & Timothy M. Smeeding, 1988. "Equivalence Scales, Well‐Being, Inequality, And Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using The Luxembourg Income Study (Lis) Database," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 34(2), pages 115-142, June.
    10. Foster, James E. & Shorrocks, Anthony F., 1988. "Inequality and poverty orderings," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2-3), pages 654-661, March.
    11. Jenkins, Stephen P & Lambert, Peter J, 1993. "Ranking Income Distributions When Needs Differ," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 39(4), pages 337-356, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick MOYES, 2008. "Poverty Measurement in Economics (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2008-06, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    2. Jean-Yves Duclos & David Sahn & Stephen D. Younger, 2006. "Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons with Discrete Indicators of Well-being," Cahiers de recherche 0628, CIRPEE.
    3. Paul Makdissi & Quentin Wodon, 2004. "Migration, poverty, and housing in Honduras," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 31(1 Year 20), pages 5-20, June.
    4. Branko Milanovic & Mauricio Apablaza & Florent Bresson & Gaston Yalonetzky, 2016. "When More Does Not Necessarily Mean Better: Health-Related Illfare Comparisons with Non-Monotone Well-Being Relationships," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62, pages 145-178, August.
    5. Miguel Szekely & Nora Lustig & Martin Cumpa & Jose Antonio Mejia, 2004. "Do we know how much poverty there is?," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 523-558.
    6. Miguel Székely & Nora Lustig & Martin Cumpa & José Antonio Mejía-Guerra, 2000. "¿Sabemos qué tanta pobreza hay?," Research Department Publications 4240, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    7. Claudio Zoli & Peter Lambert, 2012. "Sequential procedures for poverty gap dominance," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 649-673, July.
    8. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Sahn, David & Younger, Stephen D., 2003. "Polarization: Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons," Cahiers de recherche 0304, CIRPEE.
    9. Jean‐Yves Duclos & Paul Makdissi & Quentin Wodon, 2005. "Poverty‐Reducing Tax Reforms with Heterogeneous Agents," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(1), pages 107-116, February.
    10. Jean–Yves Duclos & Phillipe Grégoire, 2002. "Absolute and Relative Deprivation and the Measurement of Poverty," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 48(4), pages 471-492, December.
    11. Zheng, Buhong, 2001. "Statistical inference for poverty measures with relative poverty lines," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 337-356, April.
    12. Satya R. Chakravarty & Pietro Muliere, 2004. "Welfare indicators: a review and new perspectives. 2. Measurement of poverty," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(2), pages 247-281.
    13. Paul Makdissi & Quentin Wodon, 2006. "Fuel poverty and access to electricity: comparing households when they differ in needs," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1071-1078.
    14. Berthold, Norbert & Brunner, Alexander, 2011. "Armut - was ist das?," Discussion Paper Series 112, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    15. Jean-Yves Duclos & David Sahn & Stephen D. Younger, 2006. "Robust Multidimensional Spatial Poverty Comparisons in Ghana, Madagascar, and Uganda," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 20(1), pages 91-113.
    16. Ramses Abul Naga, 2004. "Quantity Constraints, Poverty Lines and Poverty Orderings," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 2(1), pages 31-43, April.
    17. David T. Johnson & Peter B. Dixon, 1999. "Australian Poverty Quantified by a Family‐Based Poverty Index," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 75(2), pages 103-114, June.
    18. James Foster & Joel Greer & Erik Thorbecke, 2010. "The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures: 25 years later," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(4), pages 491-524, December.
    19. Zheng, Buhong, 2000. "Minimum Distribution-Sensitivity, Poverty Aversion, and Poverty Orderings," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 116-137, November.
    20. James E. Foster & Joel Greer & Erik Thorbecke, 2010. "The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Poverty Measures: Twenty-Five Years Later," Working Papers 2010-14, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1998_num_308_1_2601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.