IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1991_num_246_1_6299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recherche-développement : un avantage à l'Allemagne

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Guellec
  • Catherine Zaidman

Abstract

[fre] Les dépenses en recherche-développement, source principale de l'innovation technologique, sont plus élevées d'un tiers en Allemagne qu'en France. Les financements publics ont un niveau similaire, mais les financements privés sont très inférieurs en France. Ceci peut s'expliquer, pour partie, par la taille plus faible de l'industrie française. Les deux pays diffèrent aussi par la répartition sectorielle . de leurs dépenses en recherche-développement et par les institutions publiques et privées supportant la recherche. Cet ensemble de facteurs permet une diffusion plus large de l'effort et des résultats dans l'industrie allemande qui manifeste, finalement, un plus grand dynamisme technologique. [spa] Investigacion-desarrollo : ventajas para Alemania - Los gastos en el rubro investigación-desarrollo, fuente principal de la innovación technológica son un tercio más elevados en Alemania que en Francia. El financiamiento público es similar en ambos países pero el privado es muy inferior en Francia. Tal situation puede explicarse, en parte, por la menor magnitud de la industria francesa. Los dos países difieren en lo que concierne a la distribución sectorial de sus presupuestos en investigacion-desarrollo y también en lo que atane a las instituciones públicas y privadas que financian la investigación. Este conjunto de factores permite una difusión más amplia del esfuerzo y de los resultados en la industria alemana, evidenciando así un mayor dinamismo technológico. [eng] Research and Development: an Advantage in Germany- Expenses for research and development, the major source of technological innovation, are a third higher in Germany than in France. Public financing is comparable, in the two countries, but private financing is much lower in France. This may, in part, be explained by the fact that French industry is smaller. The two countries also differ in the distribution of their spending in R & D between sectors, and in the public and private institutions which support research. These factors produce a wider circulation of the investment and results in the German industry which ends up revealing greater technological dynamism.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Guellec & Catherine Zaidman, 1991. "Recherche-développement : un avantage à l'Allemagne," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 246(1), pages 91-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1991_num_246_1_6299
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1991.6299
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1991.6299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1991.6299
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1991_num_246_1_6299
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1991.6299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adnan Haider Bukhari & Safdar Ullah Khan, 2008. "A Small Open Economy DSGE Model for Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 963-1008.
    2. Cukierman, Alex & Lippi, Francesco, 2001. "Labour Markets and Monetary Union: A Strategic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(473), pages 541-565, July.
    3. Lutz Arnold & Christian Bauer, 2009. "On the growth and welfare effects of monopolistic distortions," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 19-40, May.
    4. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Alexandre Janiak & Paulo Santos Monteiro, 2011. "Inflation and Welfare in Long‐Run Equilibrium with Firm Dynamics," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(5), pages 795-834, August.
    6. Colin Davis, 2013. "Regional integration and innovation offshoring with occupational choice and endogenous growth," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 59-79, January.
    7. Masashige Hamano & Pierre M. Picard, 2017. "Extensive and intensive margins and exchange rate regimes," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 804-837, August.
    8. Church, Jeffrey & Gandal, Neil, 1993. "Complementary network externalities and technological adoption," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 239-260, June.
    9. Frédéric Reynès, 2011. "The cobb-douglas function as an approximation of other functions," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01069515, HAL.
    10. Robert Dekle & Jonathan Eaton, 1994. "Agglomeration and the Price of Land: Evidence from the Prefectures," NBER Working Papers 4781, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6493 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Laiqun Jin & Xiuyan Liu & Sam Hak Kan Tang, 2021. "High-Technology Zones, Misallocation of Resources among Cities and Aggregate Productivity: Evidence from China," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-11, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    13. Andrew B. Bernard & Jonathan Eaton & J. Bradford Jensen & Samuel Kortum, 2003. "Plants and Productivity in International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1268-1290, September.
    14. Eric Parrado & Andrés Velasco, 2002. "Alternative Monetary Rules in the Open Economy: A Welfare-Based Approach," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Norman Loayza & Raimundo Soto & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Editor) (ed.),Inflation Targeting: Desing, Performance, Challenges, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 7, pages 295-348, Central Bank of Chile.
    15. Jacquet, Laurence & Lehmann, Etienne, 2021. "How to Tax Different Incomes?," IZA Discussion Papers 14739, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Hamano, Masashige, 2013. "The consumption-real exchange rate anomaly with extensive margins," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 26-46.
    17. Josef Falkinger & Volker Grossmann, 2003. "Workplaces in the Primary Economy and Wage Pressure in the Secondary Labor Market," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 159(3), pages 523-544, September.
    18. Yang, Yong, 2012. "Agglomeration density and tourism development in China: An empirical research based on dynamic panel data model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1347-1359.
    19. Ginters Bušs & Patrick Grüning, 2023. "Fiscal DSGE model for Latvia," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 2173915-217.
    20. Cavusoglu, Sabriye Sera & Macário, Rosário, 2021. "Minimum delay or maximum efficiency? Rising productivity of available capacity at airports: Review of current practice and future needs," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    21. Greenaway, David & Torstensson, Johan, 2000. "Economic Geography, Comparative Advantage and Trade within Industries: Evidence from the OECD," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 15, pages 260-280.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1991_num_246_1_6299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.