IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La réglementation hospitalière : tarification par pathologie ou achat de soins ?

Listed author(s):
  • Michel Mougeot
  • Florence Naegelen

[fre] La réglementation hospitalière : tarification par pathologie ou achat de soins ? par Michel Mougeot, Florence Naegelen De nombreux pays ont mis en place des mécanismes incitatifs pour maîtriser des dépenses de santé. La tarification par pathologie repose sur une logique de concurrence par comparaison. Les quasi-marchés dans lesquels un acheteur de soins met en concurrence des offreurs reposent sur une logique d'enchère. Cet article compare les performances de ces deux modes d'organisation dans un contexte d' anti-sélection et de risque moral lorsque la quantité est fixe et la qualité observée. Les conditions de mise en œuvre des deux mécanismes sont analysées lorsqu'elles sont identiques. Il est montré que l'achat de soins par un appel d'offres avec clauses incitatives conduit à une amélioration du bien être collectif et à une baisse du coût des soins. [eng] Hospital Control: Pathology-Based Charging or Purchase of Care? by Michel Mougeot and Florence Naegelen Many countries have introduced incentive systems in order to control health spending. Pathology-based charging rests on the logic of competition through comparison, whereas the quasi-markets in which a care purchaser invites tenders from providers are based on a bidding logic. This paper compares the performance of these two methods of organisation in a context of adverse selection and moral hazard where quantity is fixed and quality respected. The conditions for implementing the two systems are analysed when they are identical. It is demonstrated that purchase of care through an invitation to tender with incentive clauses leads to an improvement in social welfare and a drop in the cost of care.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie & prévision.

Volume (Year): 129 (1997)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 207-220

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_129_3_5874
Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1997.5874
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Keeler, Emmett B., 1990. "What proportion of hospital cost differences is justifiable?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 359-365, November.
  2. R. Preston McAfee & John McMillan, 1986. "Bidding for Contracts: A Principal-Agent Analysis," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(3), pages 326-338, Autumn.
  3. Myerson, Roger B, 1979. "Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 61-73, January.
  4. Ballard, Charles L & Shoven, John B & Whalley, John, 1985. "General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 128-138, March.
  5. Joseph P. Newhouse, 1996. "Reimbursing Health Plans and Health Providers: Efficiency in Production versus Selection," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1236-1263, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_129_3_5874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.