IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/caecpo/cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1277.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

De la Théorie générale aux modèles de défaut de coordination : Remarques sur le développement de l'approche keynésienne

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Cartelier

Abstract

[fre] Thierry Laurent et Hélène Zajdela ont raison de soutenir que la théorie néo-keynésienne conduit à une triple impasse : technique, méthodologique et empirique. La rigidité des prix n'est pas la marque distinctive de l'approche keynésienne. Il n'est pas pour autant acquis que la notion de défaut de coordination soit plus éclairante pour comprendre ce que peut être une démarche keynésienne. Les modèles de défauts de coordination sont issus d'une critique de la théorie de l'équilibre général différente, et sans doute complémentaire, de celle contenue dans la Théorie générale. . Ce qui est à la racine de la conjecture de Keynes sur le chômage involontaire n'est ni la rigidité des prix, ni l'incertitude ni la concurrence imparfaite mais bien plutôt l'asymétrie entre entrepreneurs et salariés. Les contributions de Hicks et de Clower sont aussi importantes qu'ambiguës. Il existe cependant un théorème d'existence des équilibres keynésiens, dû à Glustoff (1968), à partir duquel il est possible de réinterpréter les analyses de Hicks et de Clower dans un sens très différent de celui communément admis. [eng] Thierry Laurent and Hélène Zajdela are right when they maintain that Neo-Keynesian theory leads to a technical, methodological and empirical dead end. Sticky prices are not the distinctive feature of a Keynesian approach. But coordination failures models are not so illuminating about Keynes' approach. They come from a critique of general equilibrium theory very different of that of Keynes (even if it may be complementary). What is at the root of Keynes' conjecture about involuntary unemployment is neither sticky prices nor uncertainty nor imperfect competition but the lack of symmetry between entrepreneurs and wage-earners. Hicks and Clower contributions to the debat are as important as ambiguous. There exists however an existence theorem for Keynesian equilibria (Glustoff, 1968) from which it is possible to give an alternative interpretation of what a Keynesian approach might be.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Cartelier, 2000. "De la Théorie générale aux modèles de défaut de coordination : Remarques sur le développement de l'approche keynésienne," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(1), pages 117-126.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1277
    DOI: 10.3406/cep.2000.1277
    Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.2000.1277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.2000.1277
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1277
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/cep.2000.1277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhodes, James R, 1984. "Walras' Law and Clower's Inequality," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(42), pages 112-122, June.
    2. E. Glustoff, 1968. "On the Existence of a Keynesian Equilibrium," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 35(3), pages 327-334.
    3. Manning, Alan, 1990. "Imperfect Competition, Multiple Equilibria and Unemployment Policy," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(400), pages 151-162, Supplemen.
    4. Thierry Laurent & Hélène Zajdela, 1999. "Emploi, salaire et coordination des activités," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 67-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Piluso, 2007. "Le rôle de l'incertitude dans la théorie du chômage de Keynes Le rôle de l'incertitude dans la théorie du chômage de Keynes," Post-Print hal-01399031, HAL.
    2. Nicolas Piluso & Gabriel Colletis, 2021. "A Keynesian reformulation of the WS-PS model: Keynesian unemployment and Classical unemployment," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 447-460, July.
    3. repec:pra:mprapa:43050 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Miller, Marcus & Driffill, John, 2011. "Liquidity When It Matters Most: QE and Tobin?s q," CEPR Discussion Papers 8511, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Giuseppe Fontana & Bill Gerrard, 2006. "The future of Post Keynesian economics," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 59(236), pages 49-80.
    6. Bernardin Akitoby & Jean Mercenier, 1993. "On intertemporal general-equilibrium reallocation effects of Europe's move to a single market," Discussion Paper / Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics 87, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    7. Raurich, Xavier & Sala, Hector & Sorolla, Valeri, 2006. "Unemployment, Growth, And Fiscal Policy: New Insights On The Hysteresis Hypothesis," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 285-316, June.
    8. Michel Rosier, 2002. "The logic of Keynes' criticism of the Classical model," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 608-643.
    9. Benassy, Jean-Pascal, 1990. "Non-Walrasian equilibria, money, and macroeconomics," Handbook of Monetary Economics, in: B. M. Friedman & F. H. Hahn (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 103-169, Elsevier.
    10. Ludovic A. Julien & Nicolas Sanz, 2006. "Equilibres multiples avec chômage, coûts de transaction et concurrence monopolistique," Working Papers hal-04138523, HAL.
    11. Goulven Rubin, 2005. "La controverse entre Clower et Patinkin au sujet de la validité de la loi de Walras," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 56(1), pages 5-24.
    12. Laszlo Goerke, 2000. "The Wedge," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 68(5), pages 608-623, September.
    13. Julien, Ludovic A., 2011. "Unemployment equilibrium and economic policy in mixed markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 1931-1940, July.
    14. Julien, Ludovic A. & Sanz, Nicolas, 2005. "Monopolistic competition, transaction costs and multiple equilibria," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 21-26, April.
    15. Kaas, Leo & Madden, Paul, 2005. "Imperfectly competitive cycles with Keynesian and Walrasian features," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 861-886, May.
    16. Stülb, Wolfgang & Ramser, Hans Jürgen, 1991. "Elemente und Funktionsweise von Makromodellen mit unvollständiger Konkurrenz," Discussion Papers, Series I 254, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    17. Jean Cartelier & Claude Jessua, 1996. "Chômage involontaire d'équilibre et asymétrie entre salariés et non-salariés : la loi de Walras restreinte," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(3), pages 655-666.
    18. Miller, Marcus, 2014. "Macro coordination: Forward Guidance as ?cheap talk??," CEPR Discussion Papers 9975, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Hegeland, Erik & Taalbi, Josef, 2019. "What determines unemployment in the long run? Band spectrum regression on ten countries," Lund Papers in Economic History 203, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    20. Nicolas Piluso, 2013. "Technological choices of firms and disputed consumption equilibriums [Choix technologiques des firmes et équilibres de consommation contestée]," Post-Print hal-01399186, HAL.
    21. Giuseppe Fontana & Alfonso Palacio‐Vera, 2007. "Are Long‐Run Price Stability And Short‐Run Output Stabilization All That Monetary Policy Can Aim For?," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 269-298, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.