IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2005y2005i4id516p435-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

O ekonomické odpovědnosti
[A Word of Economic Responsibility]

Author

Listed:
  • Václav Klusoň

Abstract

The article deals with socio-economic aspects of responsible behaviour of owners, entrepreneurs and managers in practice of economic transformation. As the starting point of defining the concept of responsibility serves the elaboration of basic theoretical economic, juristic, philosophical and ethical approaches. The validity of the hypothesis that private owner is invariably the responsible owner is examined. The article argues, that social responsibility isn't the bare result of private property and that it heavily depends on appropriate institutions. The study proceeds to the institution of liability as realized in basic forms of business organizations. The liability is studied and viewed upon as a constitutive element of the market order. The responsibility is examined in the framework of rights and liabilities of entrepreneurs, partners, shareholders, managers and directors of corporations and business organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Václav Klusoň, 2005. "O ekonomické odpovědnosti [A Word of Economic Responsibility]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(4), pages 435-458.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2005:y:2005:i:4:id:516:p:435-458
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.516.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.516.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hodgson, Geoff, 1986. "Behind Methodological Individualism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 211-224, September.
    2. J. Maurice Clark, 1916. "The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(3), pages 209-209.
    3. Dell P. Champlin & Janet T. Knoedler, 2004. "J. M. Clark and the Economics of Responsibility," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 545-552, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haase, Michaela, 2020. "Considering Value-related Concepts in Service-oriented Approaches to Marketing Studies in Light of Philosophical and Economic Value Theories," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(2-3), pages 133-144.
    2. Klaus M. Leisinger, 2008. "Zur Relevanz der Unternehmensethik in der Betriebswirtschaftlehre (oder: The Business of Business is still Business–But the Rules have Changed)," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(58), pages 26-49, January.
    3. Desislava Serafimova, 2017. "CSR disclosure in Large Bulgarian Companies," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 97-106, July.
    4. Blandine Laperche & Nadine Levratto, 2012. "The Emergence of Ecological Opportunities and Firms’ Behaviour," Chapters, in: Blandine Laperche & Nadine Levratto & Dimitri Uzunidis (ed.), Crisis, Innovation and Sustainable Development, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. S. Abu Turab Rizvi, 2001. "Preference Formation and the Axioms of Choice," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 141-159.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2022. "30 Jahre Unternehmensethik: Ein ordonomischer Rückblick, Überblick und Ausblick," Discussion Papers 2022-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Guichuan Zhou & Lan Zhang & Liming Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility, the Atmospheric Environment, and Technological Innovation Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Steffen Roth & Vladislav Valentinov & Markus Heidingsfelder & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2020. "CSR Beyond Economy and Society: A Post-capitalist Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 411-423, September.
    9. Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise au-delà du fonctionnalisme : un cadre d’analyse pluraliste de l’interface entreprise - société," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(2), pages 37-66, June.
    10. Klein, Peter G. & Mahoney, Joseph T. & McGahan, Anita M. & Pitelis, Christos N., 2012. "Who Is in Charge? A Property Rights Perspective on Stakeholder Governance," Working Papers 12-0102, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    11. Haase, Michaela, 2017. "The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility: Zur Bedeutung und Rezeption von John Maurice Clarks Artikel zur ökonomischen Verantwortung," Discussion Papers 2017/18, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    12. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Vladislav Valentinov & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2016. "Emergence: A Systems Theory’s Challenge to Ethics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 597-610, December.
    14. Samuel Mercier, 2006. "Aux origines de la Stakeholder Theory:1916-1950," Working Papers CREGO 1061004, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    15. Simon Learmount, 2002. "Theorizing Corporate Governance: New Organizational Alternatives," Working Papers wp237, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Leppälä, Samuli & Desrochers, Pierre, 2010. "The division of labor need not imply regional specialization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-2), pages 137-147, May.
    17. Margaret Antonicelli & Filomena Maggino & Michele Rubino, 2021. "Sustainability and non-financial disclosure: a POSET�s approach," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 75(4), pages 130-140, October-D.
    18. White, Graham, 2012. "The New Keynesian view of aggregate demand: some reflections from a Sraffian standpoint," Working Papers 2012-15, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    19. Tiziano Distefano & Pietro Guarnieri, 2019. "Collective Actions: a Network Approach," Discussion Papers 2019/244, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Xue, Fei & Chen, Qinyuan & Chan, Kam C. & Yi, Zhihong, 2022. "Is corporate social responsibility value relevant? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of anti-corruption campaign," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 520-532.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    shareholder; ethics; entrepreneur; responsibility; liability; partnership; corporation; cooperative; owner; proprietor;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2005:y:2005:i:4:id:516:p:435-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.