IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icmbdj/v1y2017i1p97-106.html

CSR disclosure in Large Bulgarian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Desislava Serafimova

    (University of Economics - Varna)

Abstract

Communicating and reporting information about socially responsible business practices is a relevant issue for contemporary organizations. They can use different means for non-financial information disclosure related to their corporate sustainability and responsible behavior. This paper presents results from surveying the practices in social accountability used by the one hundred largest Bulgarian companies ranked according to the size of their revenues. An analysis of their CSR disclosure is made using three sources of information. The first one is based on the published social reports of the companies; the second one is CSR information disclosed as part of their annual reports. The third source of information includes CSR practices announced on the company websites. The publicly presented non-financial information on companies’ socially responsible practices has been analyzed from several viewpoints – according to the way of structuring the information in the report/section of the company website; reference to the main groups of stakeholders; classification of the published socially responsible business practices and the degree of detailing of the presented information. In the paper first the theoretical assumptions in CSR information disclosure are explained. After that, the methodical issues concerning the process of searching and evaluating the social accountability practices of large Bulgarian companies are outlined. Last, the basic tendencies of CSR disclosure in large Bulgarian companies are made and some guidelines for improving them are given.

Suggested Citation

  • Desislava Serafimova, 2017. "CSR disclosure in Large Bulgarian Companies," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 97-106, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:97-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mbd.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/icmbdj/2017/ICMBD_V1_2017_21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Thijssens & Laury Bollen & Harold Hassink, 2015. "Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Salience Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 873-891, December.
    2. Alejandra Lopez-Salazar & Jose Felipe Ojeda-Hidalgo & Martha Rios-Manriquez, 2016. "Factors Influencing the Social Responsibility of a Public Hospital," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(6), pages 42-56, November.
    3. J. Maurice Clark, 1916. "The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(3), pages 209-209.
    4. MuiChing Chan & John Watson & David Woodliff, 2014. "Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 59-73, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & María J. Barroso-Méndez & María L. Pajuelo-Moreno & Julio Sánchez-Meca, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, February.
    2. Desislava Serafimova, 2016. "CSR Assessment Model," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 100-110, September.
    3. Lin Liao & Yukun Pan & Daifei (Troy) Yao, 2023. "Capital market liberalisation and voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from a quasi‐natural experiment in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2677-2715, June.
    4. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Ahmed A. Elamer & Mounia Boulhaga, 2024. "ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3312-3327, July.
    6. Laura Bini & Francesco Giunta & Rebecca Miccini & Lorenzo Simoni, 2023. "Corporate governance quality and non-financial KPI disclosure comparability: UK evidence," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 43-74, March.
    7. Kealy, Tony, 2017. "Stakeholder outcomes in a wind turbine investment; is the Irish energy policy effective in reducing GHG emissions by promoting small-scale embedded turbines in SME's?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1157-1168.
    8. Chung, Chune Young & Doan, Gia Han & Wang, Kainan, 2024. "Local environmental organizations and long-term investor value appropriation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    9. Naima Lassoued & Imen Khanchel, 2023. "Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: the moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1075-1123, April.
    10. Paul C. Godfrey & Nile W. Hatch, 2007. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 87-98, January.
    11. Nicolo, Giuseppe & Zampone, Giovanni & Sannino, Giuseppe & Tiron-Tudor, Adriana, 2023. "Worldwide evidence of corporate governance influence on ESG disclosure in the utilities sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Dina El-Bassiouny & Peter Letmathe, 2019. "Political instability and corporate social responsibility: the case of Egypt," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(5), pages 745-767, June.
    13. Yasmeen Bashir & Yiwei Zhao & Huan Qiu & Zeeshan Ahmed & Josephine Tan-Hwang Yau, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Value Creation in Product Market: Evidence from Emerging Economies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Haifeng Zhang & Zhuo Zhang & Adrian Tan & Ekaterina Steklova, 2020. "Quantity, Quality, and Performance of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure by Listed Enterprises in China: A Regional Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Charlie Lindgren & Asif M. Huq & Kenneth Carling, 2021. "Who Are the Intended Users of CSR Reports? Insights from a Data-Driven Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    17. Lee, Gilsoo & Cho, Sam Yul & Arthurs, Jonathan & Lee, Eun Kyung, 2020. "Celebrity CEO, identity threat, and impression management: Impact of celebrity status on corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 69-84.
    18. Torelli, Riccardo & Balluchi, Federica & Furlotti, Katia, 2019. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," OSF Preprints tw6c7, Center for Open Science.
    19. Feng, Zhi-Yuan & Wang, Ying-Chieh & Wang, Wen-Gine, 2024. "Corporate carbon reduction and tax avoidance: International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2).
    20. Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & Luis Rodriguez-Dominguez, 2025. "Board of directors and environmental practices: the effect of board experience, culture, and tenure," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1643-1668, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:97-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.