IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcfu/v2007y2007i2id222p55-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Competition in the European Union and Its Influence on the Shift in the Tax Burden
[Daňová soutěž v Evropské měnové unii a její vliv na přesun daňového břemene]

Author

Listed:
  • Danuše Nerudová
  • Svatopluk Kapounek
  • Jitka Poměnková

Abstract

The paper deals with the testing of the hypothesis, whether there is negative correlation between the time series of corporate income tax yield and personal income tax yield in the states of EMU and the Czech Republic. The correlation analysis has not proved the negative correlation (except Netherlands) on 5% level of importance. It can be assumed, that in most cases the present competition in the filed of corporate income taxation in the EU does not lead to the shift in the tax burden from corporations on the individuals. The differences of corporate income taxation in individual member states reflect the different economic conditions - countries with higher tax rates offers more quality labor force and stable business environment, while the newly accessed countries use the lower tax rates for their establishment on the internal market of the European union.

Suggested Citation

  • Danuše Nerudová & Svatopluk Kapounek & Jitka Poměnková, 2007. "Tax Competition in the European Union and Its Influence on the Shift in the Tax Burden [Daňová soutěž v Evropské měnové unii a její vliv na přesun daňového břemene]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(2), pages 55-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcfu:v:2007:y:2007:i:2:id:222:p:55-72
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cfuc.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cfuc.222.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cfuc.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cfuc.222.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cfuc.222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinn, Hans-Werner, 1990. "Tax harmonization and tax competition in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2-3), pages 489-504, May.
    2. Enrique G. Mendoza & Linda L. Tesar, 2003. "A Quantitative Analysis of Tax Competition v. Tax Coordination under Perfect Capital Mobility," NBER Working Papers 9746, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Janeba, Eckhard & Smart, Michael, 2003. "Is Targeted Tax Competition Less Harmful Than Its Remedies?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 259-280, May.
    4. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    5. Puhani, Patrick A., 1999. "Labour Mobility - An Adjustment Mechanism in Euroland?," IZA Discussion Papers 34, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carl Gaigné & Stéphane Riou, 2007. "Globalization, Asymmetric Tax Competition, and Fiscal Equalization," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 9(5), pages 901-925, October.
    2. Günther Rehme, 2007. "Economic Growth and (Re-)Distributive Policies in a Non-cooperative World," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 1-40, May.
    3. Enrique G. Mendoza & Linda L. Tesar, 2003. "Winners and Losers of Tax Competition in the European Union," NBER Working Papers 10051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Alexander Haupt & Tim Krieger, 2009. "The role of mobility in tax and subsidy competition," Working Papers CIE 21, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    5. Keuschnigg, Christian & Loretz, Simon & Winner, Hannes, 2014. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union: A Survey," Working Papers in Economics 2014-4, University of Salzburg.
    6. Mark Rider, 2007. "Should Jamaica Tax Corporate Income?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 35(1), pages 103-126, January.
    7. Kosuke Oshima, 2010. "Single capital, investment choices and preferential tax regimes," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(3), pages 659-668, August.
    8. Johannes Becker & Clemens Fuest, 2011. "Optimal tax policy when firms are internationally mobile," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 18(5), pages 580-604, October.
    9. Alexander Haupt & Tim Krieger, 2009. "The Role of Mobility in Tax and Subsidy Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series 2555, CESifo Group Munich.
    10. Lenka Janíčková, 2012. "Tax Harmonization - the Possible Way out of the Crisis? [Daňová harmonizace - možná cesta z krize?]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(1), pages 64-81.
    11. George Zodrow, 2006. "Capital Mobility and Source-Based Taxation of Capital Income in Small Open Economies," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 269-294, May.
    12. Assoc. Prof. Flavia Barna Ph.D & Assist. Petru-Ovidiu Mura Ph.D Student, 2010. "Tax Competition Versus Tax Coordination In The European Union," Revista Tinerilor Economisti (The Young Economists Journal), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(15S), pages 39-46, November.
    13. Zodrow, George R, 2003. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 651-671, November.
    14. De Bonis, Valeria, 1997. "Regional integration and factor income taxation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1849, The World Bank.
    15. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2004. "Migration, Social Standards and Replacement Incomes: How to Protect Low-income Workers in the Industrialized Countries Against the Forces of Globalization and Market Integration," NBER Working Papers 10798, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Jacob Frenkel & Assaf Razin & Efraim Sadka, 1991. "International Taxation in an Integrated World," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262061430, December.
    17. Andreas Haufler, 1996. "Optimal factor and commodity taxation in a small open economy," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 3(3), pages 425-442, July.
    18. George R. Zodrow, 2019. "Intrajurisdictional Capitalization and the Incidence of the Property Tax," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: George R Zodrow (ed.), TAXATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Selected Essays of George R. Zodrow, chapter 16, pages 489-522, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Haufler, Andreas, 1994. "Unilateral tax reform under the restricted origin principle," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 511-527, October.
    20. repec:jes:wpaper:y:2011:v:3:p:579-591 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2014. "A Criticism of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Economist Ranking 2013," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(13), pages 63-67, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tax competition; Shift in the tax burden; European Monetary Union; Corporate Income Tax; Personal Income Tax; Daňová soutěž; Přesun daňového břemene; Evropská měnová unie; Daň z příjmu korporací; Daň z příjmu fyzických osob;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcfu:v:2007:y:2007:i:2:id:222:p:55-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.