Author
Abstract
Background. Healthcare and pension expenditures represent significant budgetary commitments in OECD countries, with considerable variation in spending levels influenced by factors such as demographic structures, healthcare system models, and the role of private insurance. Germany, Austria, and Czechia exemplify diverse approaches to universal healthcare, reflecting unique socio-economic and policy contexts. Objective. This study aims to compare the financial flows and spending efficiencies of healthcare systems in Germany, Austria and Czechia to identify opportunities for savings and policy innovations. Methods. A comparative analysis of secondary data from OECD reports and academic literature was conducted, examining key metrics such as public and private expenditure, health insurance contributions, and administrative costs. Results. The analysis reveals that while Germany’s dual public-private insurance system ensures comprehensive coverage, it faces challenges in integrating care services. Austria’s regionally managed system benefits from robust public funding but struggles with administrative complexity. Czechia’s centralised financing model supports equitable access but requires improved resource allocation and efficiency. Across all systems, health insurance contributions exhibit tax-like characteristics, with significant implications for public policy and perception. Recommendations. Policymakers should consider measures such as integrating care services in Germany, streamlining administrative processes in Austria, and refining fund redistribution mechanisms in Czechia. Leveraging digital health technologies and fostering transparency in healthcare financing are critical for achieving systemic savings and equity. Practical relevance/social implications. This study highlights the importance of tailored financial reforms to address demographic shifts and rising healthcare costs. Its findings provide actionable insights for policymakers aiming to balance equity and efficiency in healthcare financing while ensuring public trust and sustainability. Originality/value. By dissecting the healthcare financial flows in Germany, Austria, and Czechia, this study offers a nuanced understanding of their systems' dynamics and identifies opportunities for cross-border learning to inform global healthcare policy reform.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
- H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prf:journl:v:18:y:2024:i:2:p:180-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Magdalena Šebková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vsfspcz.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.