IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting adoption of agri-environmental schemes by farmers in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Josie McCulloch
  • Jiaqi Ge

Abstract

Much of the land across the European Union (EU) is threatened by unsustainable land-use through intensive farming. To help combat this, Agri-Environmental Schemes (AESs) are provided by the EU to encourage farmers to use a portion of their land to aid with environmental goals such as sustainable farming, bio-diversity or landscape recovery. Farmers in the EU are given the opportunity to take on an AES for a monetary payment that is based on the choice of scheme and the amount of land dedicated to it. If we know or can accurately predict which farmers adopt which AES, we can then predict if the intended benefits to the environment according to the given scheme are likely to be achieved. As a preliminary step, we develop a generalised linear model coupled with a microsimulation that is fed with data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network to predict AES uptake. We find the model is able to accurately predict approximately 70% of farmers’ decisions on whether to adopt an AES across 27 countries in the EU. In the future, this model can be used to predict, for example, if the chosen schemes adopted will lead to their intended benefits, and if changes in the offered AES payment may affect AES adoption.Author summary: The intensity of farming practices differs greatly across the European Union (EU) and post-Brexit United Kingdom. More intensive farming (e.g. high use of fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides) has a negative effect on wildlife populations, air quality and natural flood management. Since 1992, the EU has offered Agri-Environmental Schemes (AES) which encourage farmers to adopt practices that reduce their farming intensity in environmentally sensitive areas in exchange for monetary compensation for the subsequent loss of income. This system has come under scrutiny amid widespread European farmer protests in 2024, with demonstrators demanding more flexibility in environmental rules and better compensation for green farming practices. Meanwhile, the UK has replaced EU policies with its Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMS). It is important to be able to predict if farmers are likely to use these environmental schemes so the potential benefits can be understood. This paper develops a model predicting AES adoption using data on farm characteristics across the EU (e.g. economic size, crop/livestock types) and subsidy receipt history. The model achieves high accuracy and will help forecast how policy changes might affect scheme participation and subsequent environmental outcomes, while also evaluating if increasing advisory support for farmers could boost uptake.

Suggested Citation

  • Josie McCulloch & Jiaqi Ge, 2025. "Predicting adoption of agri-environmental schemes by farmers in the European Union," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000162
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000162
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000162&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Happe, Kathrin, 2004. "Agricultural policies and farm structures: Agent-based modelling and application to EU-policy reform," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 30, number 14945.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heinrich, F. & Appel, F., 2018. "Do investors ruin Germany s peasant agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Ostermeyer, Arlette & Balmann, Alfons, 2011. "Perception of dairy farming from different views - results of a stakeholder discussion in the region Altmark, Germany," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114578, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Jason Wood & James Nolan, 2021. "Plant location decisions in the ethanol industry: a dynamic and spatial analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 103-132, June.
    4. Elodie Letort & Pierre Dupraz & Laurent Piet, 2017. "The impact of environmental regulations on the farmland market and farm structures: An agent-based model applied to the Brittany region of France," Working Papers SMART 17-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    5. Louhichi, Kamel & Ciaian, Pavel & Espinosa, Maria & Colen, Liesbeth & Perni, Angel & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2015. "EU-wide individual Farm Model for CAP Analysis (IFM-CAP): Application to Crop Diversification Policy," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212155, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Möhring, A. & Zimmermann, A. & Mack, G. & Mann, S. & Ferjani, A. & Gennaio, M.-P., 2010. "Multidisziplinäre Agentendefinitionen für Optimierungsmodelle," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 45, March.
    7. Schönau, F. & Mußhoff, O., 2012. "Mit Optimierungsansätzen bessere Entscheidungen treffen? – Eine empirische Analyse in einem Planspiel," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    8. Berger, Thomas & Schreinemachers, Pepijn, 2006. "From Bioeconomic Farm Models to Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges for Parameterization and Validation," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25577, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Appel, Franziska & Musshoff, Oliver, 2011. "How appropriate are myopic optimization models to predict decision behaviour: A comparison between agent-based models and business management games," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115994, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Sahrbacher, Christoph, 2011. "Regional structural change in European agriculture: Effects of decoupling and EU accession," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 60, number 60.
    11. Csáki, Csaba & Fogács, Csaba (ed.), 2008. "Agricultural economics and transition: What was expected, what we observed, the lessons learned. Proceedings (Volume I)," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 44, number 44-1.
    12. Mack, Gabriele & Mohring, Anke & Zimmermann, Albert & Gennaio, Maria-Pia & Mann, Stefan & Ferjani, Ali, 2011. "Farm Entry Policy and Its Impact on Structural Change Analysed by and Agent-based Sector Model," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114374, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Weiss, Franz, 2007. "Modellierung landwirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels in Österreich: Vergleich einer Modellprognose mit den Ergebnissen der Strukturerhebungen (1999-2005)," Discussion Papers DP-33-2007, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    14. William Orjuela-Garzon & Santiago Quintero & Diana P. Giraldo & Laura Lotero & César Nieto-Londoño, 2021. "A Theoretical Framework for Analysing Technology Transfer Processes Using Agent-Based Modelling: A Case Study on Massive Technology Adoption (AMTEC) Program on Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Heinrich, Florian & Appel, Franziska & Balmann, Alfons, 2019. "Can land market regulations fulfill their promises?," EconStor Preprints 208388, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. Espinosa, Maria & Gocht, Alexander & Heckelei, Thomas & Paloma, Sergio Gomez y, 2016. "Incorporating farm structural change in models assessing the Common Agricultural Policy: An application in the CAPRI farm type model," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 1040-1059.
    17. Heinrich, Florian & Appel, Franziska & Balmann, Alfons, 2019. "Can land market regulations fulfill their promises?," FORLand Working Papers 12 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    18. repec:kap:iaecre:v:15:y:2009:i:1:p:125-137 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Gomez y Paloma, Sergio & Majewski, Edward & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2007. "Facing the future: strategies and investment behaviour of polish farmers," 104th Seminar, September 5-8, 2007, Budapest, Hungary 7842, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Thomas Fellmann & Judith Möllers, 2009. "Structural Change in Rural Croatia—Is Early Retirement An Option?," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 15(1), pages 125-137, February.
    21. Sahrbacher, Amanda, 2012. "Impacts of CAP reforms on farm structures and performance disparities: An agent-based approach," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 65, number 65.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.