IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353567.html

Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihao Gao
  • Muhammad Waseem Bari
  • Sadia Shaheen

Abstract

This paper employs sensemaking theory to examine the relationships between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and the quality of decision-making in information technology firms. Additionally, this study operationalized sensemaking processes as a mediator in the above mentioned relationships. The study employed a three-time lag approach with a 45-day gap, utilizing data from 348 managers, supervisors, and leaders. Partial least squares structural equation modeling and SmartPLS 4 are employed for the analyses. The results indicate that rationalized knowledge-hiding and communication patterns have a significant impact on decision-making quality. Moreover, sensemaking processes partially/complementary mediate the relationship between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and decision-making quality. Incorporating sensemaking processes into the study model provides deeper insight into managers’ decisions and maps the temporal nature of these relationships. These valuable findings shed light on new meanings and directions for theoretical perspectives and their relevance in management and organizational behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihao Gao & Muhammad Waseem Bari & Sadia Shaheen, 2026. "Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353567
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353567&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.