IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0346137.html

Identifying researcher characteristics driving growth in Japanese University-originated deep-tech startups: A machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshifumi Mizuhara
  • Tetsusei Kurashiki

Abstract

Active involvement of researchers with strong outputs is essential for growth of deep-tech university-originated startups. We used the University-Originated Venture Database to link total funding amount with researchers’ publication metrics and KAKENHI grant records. Classification models were constructed to distinguish growing and non-growing startups, followed by feature-importance and breakdown-tree analyses to interpret which researcher attributes drive growth. We then applied these defined characteristics to evaluate researcher profiles at top Japanese universities to assess their entrepreneurial engagement. This process revealed a disconnect between high-quality research achievements and actual startup activity. These insights underpin an identification framework that can guide investment and policy decisions in Japan’s deep-tech ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshifumi Mizuhara & Tetsusei Kurashiki, 2026. "Identifying researcher characteristics driving growth in Japanese University-originated deep-tech startups: A machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346137
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346137
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0346137&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0346137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josh Lerner, 2002. "Patent Protection and Innovation Over 150 Years," NBER Working Papers 8977, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee Branstetter & Raymond Fisman & C. Fritz Foley, 2005. "Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Data," NBER Working Papers 11516, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Eric Budish & Benjamin Roin & Heidi Williams, 2013. "Do fixed patent terms distort innovation? Evidence from cancer clinical trials," Discussion Papers 13-001, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Yang, Wei & Wang, Xueke, 2024. "The impact of patent protection on technological innovation: A global value chain division of labor perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Grönqvist, Charlotta, 2009. "Empirical studies on the private value of Finnish patents," Bank of Finland Scientific Monographs, Bank of Finland, volume 0, number sm2009_041, December.
    5. Claude DIEBOLT & Karine PELLIER, 2018. "Patents in the Long Run: Theory, History and Statistics," Working Papers of BETA 2018-20, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Hella Bani Baghdadi & Sami Aouadi, 2018. "Does Patent Performance Promote Relative Technological Performance in Countries Bordering the Mediterranean?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(4), pages 1246-1269, December.
    7. Michele Boldrin & David K. Levine, 2013. "The Case against Patents," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 3-22, Winter.
    8. Filippo Mezzanotti, 2021. "Roadblock to Innovation: The Role of Patent Litigation in Corporate R&D," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7362-7390, December.
    9. Rosina Moreno & Jordi Suriñach, 2014. "Innovation adoption and productivity growth: evidence for Europe," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 86(02), pages 62-87.
    10. Iftekhar Hasan & Fahad Khalil & Xian Sun, 2017. "The Impacts of Intellectual Property Rights Protection on Cross-Border M&As," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(03), pages 1-35, September.
    11. de Saint-Georges, Matthis & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno, 2013. "A quality index for patent systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 704-719.
    12. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt & Susanne Prantl, 2015. "Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 223-262, September.
    13. Liu, An-Hsiang & Siebert, Ralph B., 2022. "The competitive effects of declining entry costs over time: Evidence from the static random access memory market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Vijay Sattiraju & Virendra S. Ligade & Pradeep Muragundi & Ravi Pandey & Manthan D. Janodia, 2023. "National and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) IP Policies: Comparison of Indian HEIs’ IP Policies from a Global Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1979-2006, June.
    15. Dietmar Harhoff, 2006. "Patente - Segen oder Fluch für Innovationen?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(54), pages 86-109, January.
    16. Barros, Henrique M., 2021. "Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    17. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2025. "Aid for trade flows and the strength of patent right protection," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1-30, May.
    18. Xiang Yu & Wantao Chen & Wei Yang, 2025. "Spatio-temporal evolution, country differences and the role of proximity: an investigation of international patenting," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 582-619, April.
    19. Sunil Kanwar & Stefan Sperlich, 2020. "Innovation, productivity and intellectual property reform in an emerging market economy: evidence from India," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 933-950, August.
    20. Ha Thi-Thu Le & Trang Thi-Dai Luong & Trang Thi Thu Nguyen & Duy Van Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Asian Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4780-4806, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0346137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.