IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0338739.html

Is price associated with the quality of medicines? Evidence from active pharmaceutical ingredient testing in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Chantel Montás
  • Chimezie Anyakora
  • Elisa Maria Maffioli

Abstract

Determining the quality of medicines remains a challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where regulatory oversight and enforcement vary, and resources and infrastructure for quality testing are often constrained. In these settings, price is often used as a proxy for higher-quality medicines, yet empirical evidence supporting this assumption remains scarce. We conducted a mystery shopper survey in over 1,200 retail pharmacies across urban and rural areas in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria, purchasing one drug sample from a list of twenty branded medicines, including analgesics, antimalarials, antibiotics, antihypertensives, and multivitamins. A sub-sample of the purchased medicines (N = 246) was tested for quality, defined as passing a laboratory test using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) to measure the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) content of each medicine. Using probit regressions, we examined the extent to which price is associated with quality, controlling for observable pharmacy and drug sample characteristics. A 1% increase in price is associated with a 16.7 percentage point increase in the probability of passing the laboratory test, conditional on other factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis shows strong out-of-sample classification performance, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.82 for the price-only model, indicating that price alone explains much of the variation in quality. Other results show that medicines organized by brand and displaying visible expiration dates may signal higher quality, while the presence of other observable characteristics (e.g., packaging, storage, display) shows more counterintuitive associations with drug quality in this context. Stratified analyses show that the association between price and quality is particularly strong for analgesics and antibiotics. These findings suggest that price appears to be a reliable signal of medicine quality, whereas other characteristics of pharmacies and drug samples provide weaker and less consistent indicators. This underscores the need for stronger regulatory oversight, greater market transparency, and targeted consumer education to promote safer access to quality medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Chantel Montás & Chimezie Anyakora & Elisa Maria Maffioli, 2025. "Is price associated with the quality of medicines? Evidence from active pharmaceutical ingredient testing in Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338739
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0338739&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0338739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svensson, Jakob & Björkman Nyqvist, Martina & Yanagizawa-Drott, David, 2012. "Can Good Products Drive Out Bad? Evidence from Local Markets for (Fake?) Antimalarial Medicine in Uganda," CEPR Discussion Papers 9114, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Asher Wolinsky, 1983. "Prices as Signals of Product Quality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 50(4), pages 647-658.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco B. Galarza & Gabriella Wong, 2017. "The Impact of Price Information on Consumer Behavior: An Experiment," Working Papers 106, Peruvian Economic Association.
    2. Alessio Emanuele BIONDO, 2011. "High-Tech Products and the Double Adverse Selection: Does Commercial Distribution Worsen Efficiency?," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 1(7), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Kimmo Eriksson & Brent Simpson, 2007. "Deception and price in a market with asymmetric information," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2, pages 23-28, February.
    4. Esther Atukunda & Anne Fitzpatrick, 2015. "An Evaluation of Factors Affecting Drug Quality: Evidence from the Antimalarial Market in Uganda," Working Papers 2015_03, University of Massachusetts Boston, Economics Department.
    5. Bate, Roger & Jin, Ginger Zhe & Mathur, Aparna, 2011. "Does price reveal poor-quality drugs? Evidence from 17 countries," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1150-1163.
    6. Ellingsen, Tore, 1997. "Price signals quality: The case of perfectly inelastic demand," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 43-61, November.
    7. Monteiro, Paulo Klinger & Moraga-González, José Luis, 2003. "We Sold a Million Units -- The Role of Advertising Past-Sales," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 57(2), April.
    8. Ingrid Bauer & Liudmila Zavolokina & Gerhard Schwabe, 2020. "Is there a market for trusted car data?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 211-225, June.
    9. Paolo G. Garella & Martin Peitz, 2000. "Intermediation Can Replace Certification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Ekmekci, Mehmet & Kos, Nenad, 2023. "Signaling covertly acquired information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Asher Wolinsky, 1994. "Competition in Markets for Credence Goods," Discussion Papers 1099, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    12. Ajay Kalra & Surendra Rajiv & Kannan Srinivasan, 1998. "Response to Competitive Entry: A Rationale for Delayed Defensive Reaction," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 380-405.
    13. Carlyle Farrell & Gervan Fearon, 2005. "Renting Goodwill in International Marketing Channels: An Analysis of Pricing Strategies and Bargaining Power," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 33(3), pages 285-296, September.
    14. Cuffaro, Nadia & Di Giacinto, Marina, 2015. "Credence goods, consumers’ trust in regulation and high quality exports," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 4(2), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Jeanine Miklós-Thal, 2012. "Linking reputations through umbrella branding," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 335-374, September.
    16. Nicholas Wilson, 2015. "Can Disease-Specific Funding Harm Health? in the Shadow of HIV/AIDS Service Expansion," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(5), pages 1671-1700, October.
    17. Helmut Bester & Matthias Lang & Jianpei Li, 2021. "Signaling versus Auditing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(4), pages 859-883, December.
    18. Christian Michel, 2018. "Contractual structures and consumer misperceptions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 188-205, June.
    19. In-Uck Park & Joon Song, 2021. "Price Signalling Differentiated Experience Goods: Are Uniform Movie Prices a Puzzle?," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 37, pages 85-113.
    20. Kim, Jeong-Yoo & Berg, Nathan, 2017. "Reexamining the Schmalensee effect," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 11, pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0338739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.