IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does China’s corporate two-way foreign direct investment mitigate environmental pollution?

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Yang
  • Tingwei Chen
  • Linlin Han
  • Susu Wang

Abstract

The global push for low-carbon growth highlights the urgent need to examine how corporate internationalization shapes environmental performance. However, the environmental implications of corporate two-way foreign direct investment (CTFDI, integrating inward and outward FDI) remain insufficiently explored. This study investigates whether CTFDI mitigates corporate pollution emissions in line with the pollution halo hypothesis. This study employs a multiple fixed-effects OLS model using 43,410 firm-year observations from 2,894 A-share listed Chinese firms over 2008–2022. The results indicate that CTFDI significantly reduces emissions, with a one-unit increase associated with an average 0.15% decline. Mechanism analysis demonstrates that research and development investment and the adoption of digital and intelligent technologies are primary channels through which CTFDI exerts this effect. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that non-state-owned enterprises and firms in non-polluting industries experience more pronounced benefits. Overall, the findings provide robust empirical evidence supporting the pollution halo hypothesis from the perspective of two-way FDI and highlight the role of economic openness in advancing green corporate development.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Yang & Tingwei Chen & Linlin Han & Susu Wang, 2025. "Does China’s corporate two-way foreign direct investment mitigate environmental pollution?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333935
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333935
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333935&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.