Author
Listed:
- Myriam Ruiz-Rodríguez
- Arlin Martha Bibiana Pérez-Hernández
- Flor de María Cáceres-Manrique
- Cristina María Mejía-Merino
- Elba María De La Cruz Bermúdez-Quintana
- Darlynne Xiomara Alfaro-Benavides
- Adrián Arcenio Hidalgo-Erazo
- Fabio Alberto Camargo-Figuera
Abstract
In several parts of the world, women are subjected to disrespectful and offensive treatment during childbirth. Humanized obstetrics or humanized childbirth has emerged as a response to this situation, and it refers to a model of comprehensive care for labor and childbirth that focuses on the respect and dignity of the woman. This study was aimed at estimating the prevalence and factors associated with humanized childbirth, as perceived by women in six major cities in Colombia. An analytical, multicenter, representative cross-sectional study was conducted in a random sample of six Colombian cities, including the country’s capital. We included 1294 women who were over 14 years of age and who had an institution-assisted vaginal childbirth resulting in a live birth in 2018. The prevalence of humanized childbirth in the sample of participating cities was 32.9% (95% confidence interval, 30.4–35.5). The city of residence of the pregnant woman, the presence of health problems during pregnancy, attendance at an antenatal course, the sex of the attending professional, and the association between the involvement of an obstetrician–gynecologist and the occurrence of a humanized childbirth were examined. These results indicate the need to monitor compliance with existing regulations to ensure dignified, respectful, and humane care that prioritizes women.
Suggested Citation
Myriam Ruiz-Rodríguez & Arlin Martha Bibiana Pérez-Hernández & Flor de María Cáceres-Manrique & Cristina María Mejía-Merino & Elba María De La Cruz Bermúdez-Quintana & Darlynne Xiomara Alfaro-Benavide, 2025.
"Humanized childbirth in Colombia: Prevalence and associated factors,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-14, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0326766
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326766
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.