IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on agricultural carbon emissions transfer of inter-provincial trade in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xidong Zhang
  • Juan Zhang
  • Wenhao Fu
  • Ziting Pei
  • Bin Zhang
  • Mufan Zhuang

Abstract

The "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals" has put forward new requirements for China’s agricultural carbon emission reduction. It is easy to ignore the carbon emission transfer caused by agricultural trade if the reduction responsibility of carbon emission is merely defined from the supply side. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on agricultural carbon transfer for reasonably dividing the responsibility of agricultural carbon reduction in different provinces. In this study, the cross-section data of 31 provincial-level administrative regions in China in 2015, 2018 and 2021 were used to calculate the agricultural carbon emissions of each province from the production side, and the agricultural carbon transfer model was applied to study the spatial transfer characteristics of agricultural carbon emissions. The results show that: (1) In 2015, 2018, and 2021, the net carbon transfer in Chinese agriculture was 125.76 million tons, 132.49 million tons, and 133.02 million tons, respectively, accounting for 11.97%, 13.31%, and 13.61% of agricultural carbon emissions respectively. (2) The net input area of agricultural carbon emissions formed a spatial distribution pattern of four major regions which are concentrated in the southeast coastal areas, and the gap of net input of emissions was narrowing among the regions. Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Fujian are the regions with the largest net agricultural carbon input among the net input regions. The net agricultural carbon input increased from 43.00 million tons in 2015 to 52.71 million tons in 2021. In Guangdong and Guangxi, agricultural carbon emissions decreased from 41.34 million tons in 2015 to 35.61 million tons in 2021. In Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou, agricultural carbon emissions decreased from 22.98 million tons in 2015 to 14.20 million tons in 2021. Beijing and Tianjin are the regions with the smallest net agricultural carbon input among the four net input regions, with the net agricultural carbon input increasing from 12.53 million tons in 2015 to 13.92 million tons in 2021. (3) The net output area of agricultural carbon emissions also formed a spatial distribution pattern of four major regions, and they were concentrated in the north of China with the center of gravity of net output shifting to the north. In 2015, Heilongjiang and Jilin were the regions with the largest net carbon output among the four net output regions. The net agricultural carbon output increased from 38.45 million tons in 2015 to 39.44 million tons in 2021. In Xinjiang and Gansu, the net agricultural carbon output increased from 15.87 million tons in 2015 to 23.37 million tons in 2021. In Inner Mongolia, the net agricultural carbon output increased from 17.03 million tons in 2015 to 23.05 million tons in 2021. Henan and Anhui have consistently maintained a high level of net agricultural carbon output, the net agricultural carbon output decreased from 35.54 million tons in 2015 to 25.68 million tons in 2021. On the whole, the spatial transfer of agricultural carbon emissions in China shows the characteristics of "north carbon transport to south" bounded by the Yangtze River. This paper believes that agricultural policies of carbon emission reduction should be formulated at both ends of agricultural supply and demand due to the spatial transfer of agricultural carbon emissions, which is not only conducive to stabilizing the production enthusiasm of major agricultural production provinces, but also conducive to controlling carbon emissions in output and input regions. For this purpose, the study puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to promote the reduction of agricultural carbon emission in different provinces, so as to better leverage the green and low-carbon development in the agricultural field under the guidance of the "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals".

Suggested Citation

  • Xidong Zhang & Juan Zhang & Wenhao Fu & Ziting Pei & Bin Zhang & Mufan Zhuang, 2024. "Analysis on agricultural carbon emissions transfer of inter-provincial trade in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311744
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311744
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311744&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng, Bo & Wang, Jianguo & Andrew, Robbie & Xiao, Hao & Xue, Jinjun & Peters, Glen P., 2017. "Spatial spillover effects in determining China's regional CO2 emissions growth: 2007–2010," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 161-173.
    2. Lili Guo & Shuang Zhao & Yuting Song & Mengqian Tang & Houjian Li, 2022. "Green Finance, Chemical Fertilizer Use and Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Stavros Afionis & Marco Sakai & Kate Scott & John Barrett & Andy Gouldson, 2017. "Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), January.
    4. Rahel Aichele & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2015. "Kyoto and Carbon Leakage: An Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Content of Bilateral Trade," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(1), pages 104-115, March.
    5. Yihui Chen & Minjie Li & Kai Su & Xiaoyong Li, 2019. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of the Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Fujian, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Liu, Hongguang & Liu, Weidong & Fan, Xiaomei & Zou, Wei, 2015. "Carbon emissions embodied in demand–supply chains in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 294-305.
    7. Aldy Darwili & Enno Schröder, 2023. "On the Interpretation and Measurement of Technology-Adjusted Emissions Embodied in Trade," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 65-98, January.
    8. Fu, YiCheng & Zhao, Jinyong & Wang, Chengli & Peng, Wenqi & Wang, Qi & Zhang, Chunling, 2018. "The virtual Water flow of crops between intraregional and interregional in mainland China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 204-213.
    9. Zhang, Zengkai & Guo, Ju'e & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 2014. "The effects of direct trade within China on regional and national CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 161-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.
    2. Sun, Xudong & Li, Jiashuo & Qiao, Han & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Energy implications of China's regional development: New insights from multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 118-131.
    3. Zhang, Zengkai & Zhang, ZhongXiang & Zhu, Kunfu, 2020. "Allocating carbon responsibility: The role of spatial production fragmentation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Zhang, Zengkai & Lin, Jintai, 2018. "From production-based to consumption-based regional carbon inventories: Insight from spatial production fragmentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 549-567.
    5. Yuan, Rong & Rodrigues, João F.D. & Tukker, Arnold & Behrens, Paul, 2018. "The impact of the expansion in non-fossil electricity infrastructure on China’s carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1994-2008.
    6. Zhang, Yang & Hu, Shan & Yan, Da & Jiang, Yi, 2023. "Proposing a carbon emission responsibility allocation method with benchmark approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Xidong Zhang & Juan Zhang & Chengbo Yang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China, 2000–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. PU, Zhengning & YUE, Shujing & GAO, Peng, 2020. "The driving factors of China's embodied carbon emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Yang Yang & Suocheng Dong & Fujia Li & Hao Cheng & Zehong Li & Yu Li & Shantong Li, 2021. "An analysis on the adoption of an interregional carbon emission reduction allocation approach in the context of China’s interprovincial carbon emission transfer," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4385-4411, March.
    10. Su, Bin & Thomson, Elspeth, 2016. "China's carbon emissions embodied in (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2006–2012," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 414-422.
    11. Anton Hartl, 2019. "The effects of the Kyoto Protocol on the carbon trade balance," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(3), pages 539-574, August.
    12. Yu, Shasha & Yuan, Xuanyu & Yao, Xinyan & Lei, Ming, 2022. "Carbon leakage and low-carbon performance: Heterogeneity of responsibility perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    13. Chao Hu & Jin Fan & Jian Chen, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Zhang, Zhonghua & Zhao, Yuhuan & Su, Bin & Zhang, Yongfeng & Wang, Song & Liu, Ya & Li, Hao, 2017. "Embodied carbon in China’s foreign trade: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 492-510.
    15. Yan, Bingqian & Duan, Yuwan & Wang, Shouyang, 2020. "China’s emissions embodied in exports: How regional and trade heterogeneity matter," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Wenbin Shao & Fangyi Li & Zhaoyang Ye & Zhipeng Tang & Wu Xie & Yu Bai & Shanlin Yang, 2019. "Inter-Regional Spillover of Carbon Emissions and Employment in China: Is It Positive or Negative?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    18. Xie, Rui & Wang, Fangfang & Chevallier, Julien & Zhu, Bangzhu & Zhao, Guomei, 2018. "Supply-side structural effects of air pollutant emissions in China: A comparative analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 89-95.
    19. Yan, Bingqian & Xia, Yan & Jiang, Xuemei, 2023. "Carbon productivity and value-added generations: Regional heterogeneity along global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-125.
    20. Misch, Florian & Wingender, Philippe, 2024. "Revisiting carbon leakage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.