IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308215.html

Research on the path of green technology innovation driven by the Environmental Protection Tax Law: Based on data of heavy polluting enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Tao
  • Jian-ya Zhou
  • Ye-ling Zhao

Abstract

Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL) is a compulsory environmental regulation measure adopted by China to deal with environmental problems. However, with the advancement of implementation, the EPTL produces a dissimilation effect and damages the realization of the Porter hypothesis effect. The study examines the dissimilation effect of green technology innovation regulated by the EPTL using sample data from heavy pollution firms in China. According to the empirical test results: (1) the coordination between levies and administrations, differential tax rate setting, tax information sharing, definition of the scope of levy and administration, tax declaration counseling, and tax rate level verification produce the dissimilation effect; (2) the Porter hypothesis effect of the EPTL is the most significant in medium-sized enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises. By constructing the research model group of dissimilation effect, this study analyzes the application of environmental regulation in China’s social and economic background, thus providing a reference for developing of the green economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Tao & Jian-ya Zhou & Ye-ling Zhao, 2024. "Research on the path of green technology innovation driven by the Environmental Protection Tax Law: Based on data of heavy polluting enterprises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308215
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308215
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308215&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Ailan & Dai, Sijia & Wang, Zhixuan, 2023. "Environmental protection tax on enterprise environmental, social and governance performance: A multi-perspective analysis based on financing constraints," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Dai, Mengsi & Ma, Xiaowei & Charles, Vincent & Shahzad, Umer & Zhao, Xin, 2024. "Economic policy uncertainty and the inhibitory effect of firms' green technology innovation," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Doğan, Buhari & Chu, Lan Khanh & Ghosh, Sudeshna & Diep Truong, Huong Hoang & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2022. "How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 645-656.
    4. Wang, Jia & Zhang, Shuying, 2024. "Environmental protection tax, green innovation, and environmental, social, and governance performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Kong, Zhenhuan & Du, Jianxiao & Kong, Yilin & Cui, Xiaoyu, 2024. "Financial development, environmental regulation, and corporate green technology innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    6. Yan, Zhijun & Jia, Yuting & Zhang, Bingbing, 2024. "Environmental protection taxes and green productivity: Evidence from listed companies in China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    7. Fethi, Sami & Rahuma, Abdulhamid, 2020. "The impact of eco-innovation on CO2 emission reductions: Evidence from selected petroleum companies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 108-115.
    8. Ye, Yongwei & Li, Chaoqun & Li, Xiaofan & Tao, Yunqing & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The role of tax enforcement on green innovation: Evidence from the consolidation of state and local tax bureau (CSLTB)," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 221-232.
    9. Walls, W.D. & Zheng, Xiaoli, 2021. "Environmental regulation and safety outcomes: Evidence from energy pipelines in Canada," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Han, Lei & Xiao, Zijun & Yu, Yongze, 2024. "Environmental judicature and enterprises’ green technology innovation: A revisit of the porter hypothesis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Hong & Singh, Baljeet & Gangopadhyay, Partha & Tanin, Tauhidul Islam & Das, Narasingha, 2025. "Threshold effects of environmental tax on climate vulnerability," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Qu, Fang & She, Wensen & Li, Ding, 2025. "Environmental tax reform and green innovation: unintended suppression effects and policy mix solutions from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1393-1415.
    3. Bai, Yun & Zhang, Xin’ai & Wang, Siyun & Ma, Minghui, 2026. "Actions according with words? Environmental regulation and pollutant emissions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 459-471.
    4. Wei Tao & Jian-ya Zhou, 2024. "A study on the "Porter Hypothesis" effect of the regulatory measures of the environmental protection tax law in the post-pandemic era," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Zhang, Jingjing & Zhang, Weiwei & Su, Chang & Kattuman, Paul, 2025. "The impact of environmental protection fee-to-tax reform on differentiated environmental management behavior of firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    6. Zhang, Jingwei & Leng, Haijuan, 2025. "Does green innovation enhance corporate social responsibility? ——Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Zhang, Zixuan & Ge, Zhenyu & Liu, Shuhan, 2024. "The low carbon transformation of cities and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Giovanni Carnazza & Thomas I. Renström & Luca Spataro, 2023. "Is public debt environmentally friendly? The role of EU fiscal rules on environmental quality: An empirical assessment," Working Papers 2023.26, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Edmund Ntom Udemba & Syed Ale Raza Shah & Lucy Davou Philip & Guangyuan Zhao, 2024. "The mediating role of green energy and environmental policies in sustainable development for BRICS economies: A tripartite impact of entrepreneurial activities, urban development and economic growth on ecological footprint," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4649-4670, October.
    10. Liu, Chunxia & Jia, Xiaokui, 2026. "Environmental tax refund policy, cross-regional corporate investment, and green governance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Alola, Andrew Adewale & Özkan, Oktay & Usman, Ojonugwa, 2023. "Examining crude oil price outlook amidst substitute energy price and household energy expenditure in the USA: A novel nonparametric multivariate QQR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Yunzhao, Lu, 2022. "Modelling the role of eco innovation, renewable energy, and environmental taxes in carbon emissions reduction in E−7 economies: Evidence from advance panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 309-318.
    13. Ebrahim Abbas Abdullah Abbas Amer & Zhang Xiuwu & Ebrahim Mohammed Ali Meyad & Mohammed Muneer Alareqi & SAMEER. M. H. BATHER & Amr Abdelwahed, 2025. "Nexus between renewable-disaggregated non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in GCC countries: a Cobb-Douglas production function analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Muhammad Anas & Wei Zhang & Satar Bakhsh & Liaqat Ali & Cem Işık & Jie Han & Xuemeng Liu & Hamad Ur Rehman & Amjad Ali & Min Huang, 2024. "Moving towards sustainable environment development in emerging economies: The role of green finance, green tech‐innovation, natural resource depletion, and forested area in assessing the load capacity factor," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3004-3020, August.
    15. Umar Farooq & Mohammad Mahtab Alam & Bilal Haider Subhani & Mosab I. Tabash & Zilola Shamansurova, 2024. "Non-Linear Effects of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Green Innovation: Evidence from BRICS Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Rongrong Li & Qiang Wang & Zhuang Yang, 2025. "Natural Resource Rents and Energy Transition: Overcoming Barriers to Achieve Affordable and Clean Energy (Sustainable Development Goal 7)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 757-786, November.
    17. Meng, Li & Zhang, Jintao & Pang, Pai, 2026. "Unintended consequences of tax enforcement reform: Evidence from corporate social responsibility report readability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Wang, Qin & Wang, Ying, 2025. "What shapes export competitiveness of home country firms? Host country environmental regulations or labor standards," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Ullah, Assad & Dogan, Mesut & Pervaiz, Amber & Ather Bukhari, Azaz Ali & Akkus, Hilmi Tunahan & Dogan, Husna, 2024. "The impact of digitalization, technological and financial innovation on environmental quality in OECD countries: Investigation of N-shaped EKC hypothesis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova & Vladimir A. Ermolaev, 2021. "Is Environment a Strategic Priority of the Leading Energy Companies? Evidence from Mission Statements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.