IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0306055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boosting agricultural green development: Does socialized service matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Yongqi Yu
  • Zexin Chi
  • Yanfeng Yu
  • Junjie Zhao
  • Liulin Peng

Abstract

Agricultural socialized service is gradually emerging as a new stimulus for enhancing the agricultural production environment. However, their precise impact on improving the agricultural ecological environment and promoting the green development of agriculture remains incompletely understood. Therefore, leveraging panel data spanning from 2003 to 2020 across 31 provinces in China, this study utilizes the bidirectional fixed effect model, moderating effect model, and spatial Durbin model to systematically assess the influence of agricultural socialized services on agricultural green development and its spatial ramifications. The findings show that (I) agricultural socialized services significantly contribute to promoting agricultural green development, particularly in regions with lower aging demographics. (II) The application of the spatial Durbin model reveals that this promotional effect does not exhibit significant spatial spillover effect. (III) The role of agricultural socialized services in fostering agricultural green development can be significantly enhanced by advancements in land transfer, agricultural technological innovations, and the improvement of rural human capital. In conclusion, the study provides a set of policy recommendations that include government financial support, facilitating land transfer, improving rural education and technical training, and promoting green production technologies to effectively promote agricultural green development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongqi Yu & Zexin Chi & Yanfeng Yu & Junjie Zhao & Liulin Peng, 2024. "Boosting agricultural green development: Does socialized service matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306055
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306055
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306055&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0306055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qinhang Xu & Peixin Zhu & Liang Tang, 2022. "Agricultural Services: Another Way of Farmland Utilization and Its Effect on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Yingyu Zhu & Junmiao Deng & Menghan Wang & Yuanchang Tan & Wei Yao & Yan Zhang, 2022. "Can Agricultural Productive Services Promote Agricultural Environmental Efficiency in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Jingpeng Chen & Desheng Zhang & Zhi Chen & Zhijian Li & Zigong Cai, 2022. "Effect of Agricultural Social Services on Green Production of Natural Rubber: Evidence from Hainan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Michael R. Carter & Yang Yao, 2002. "Local versus Global Separability in Agricultural Household Models: The Factor Price Equalization Effect of Land Transfer Rights," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 702-715.
    5. Lin, Yang & Hu, Ruifa & Zhang, Chao & Chen, Kevin, 2022. "The role of public agricultural extension services in driving fertilizer use in rice production in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Chunfang Yang & Hengyuan Zeng & Yifeng Zhang, 2022. "Are Socialized Services of Agricultural Green Production Conducive to the Reduction in Fertilizer Input? Empirical Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Yiriyibin Bambio & Salima Bouayad Agha, 2018. "Land tenure security and investment: Does strength of land right really matter in rural Burkina Faso?," Post-Print hal-04328928, HAL.
    8. Bambio, Yiriyibin & Bouayad Agha, Salima, 2018. "Land tenure security and investment: Does strength of land right really matter in rural Burkina Faso?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 130-147.
    9. Liu, Zhen & Zhang, Meiling & Li, Qiuming & Zhao, Xing, 2023. "The impact of green trade barriers on agricultural green total factor productivity: Evidence from China and OECD countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 319-331.
    10. Song, Ge & Ren, Gaofeng, 2022. "Spatial response of cultivated land use efficiency to the maize structural adjustment policy in the "Sickle Bend" region of China: An empirical study from the cold area of northeast," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Wenjian He & Yiyang Liu & Huaping Sun & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2020. "How Does Climate Change Affect Rice Yield in China?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Ma, Wenqi & Li, Jianhui & Ma, Lin & Wang, Fanghao & Sisák, István & Cushman, Gregory & Zhang, Fusuo, 2008. "Nitrogen flow and use efficiency in production and utilization of wheat, rice, and maize in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 53-63, December.
    13. Hongpeng Guo & Shuang Xu & Chulin Pan, 2020. "Measurement of the Spatial Complexity and Its Influencing Factors of Agricultural Green Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    15. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    16. Xiaoxuan Chen & Tongshan Liu, 2023. "Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beihe Wu & Yan Guo & Zhaojiu Chen & Liguo Wang, 2024. "Do Agricultural Productive Services Impact the Carbon Emissions of the Planting Industry in China: Promotion or Inhibition?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Xuelan Li & Rui Guan, 2023. "How Does Agricultural Mechanization Service Affect Agricultural Green Transformation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Wang, Shuhong & Liu, Xintian & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2024. "An evaluative study of economic security from the perspective of land resource assets," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Yingzheng Yan & Liupeng Chen & Ziwei Zhou & Yuanzhu Wei, 2025. "Digital financial inclusion and agricultural modernization development in China—a study based on the perspective of agricultural mechanization services," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Huy, Hoang Trieu & Nguyen, Trung Thanh, 2019. "Cropland rental market and farm technical efficiency in rural Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 408-423.
    6. Xiaoxuan Chen & Tongshan Liu, 2023. "Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Linwei Wang & Yixin Hu & Rong Kong, 2023. "The Impact of Bancassurance Interaction on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technology in Family Farms: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Lulu Wang & Jie Lyu & Junyan Zhang, 2024. "Explicating the Role of Agricultural Socialized Services on Chemical Fertilizer Use Reduction: Evidence from China Using a Double Machine Learning Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Qiaoni Yang & Ningning Zhang & Qianwen Lu & Xinru Han, 2023. "Family Net Income, Input Factor Prices and Agriculture Services Selection Behavior of Maize Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Bambio, Yiriyibin, 2025. "Gender differences in agricultural productivity: Puzzling evidence from West Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Qiang Huang & Huizhu Wang & Chao Chen, 2022. "The Influence of Government Regulation on Farmers’ Green Production Behavior—From the Perspective of the Market Structure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Balasubramanya, Soumya & Kafle, Kashi, 2025. "Adoption of land restoration activities in Ethiopia: Understanding gender-labor dimensions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Chaozhu Li & Xiaoliang Li & Jiaxu Wang & Tianchu Feng, 2023. "Impacts of Aging Agricultural Labor Force on Land Transfer: An Empirical Analysis Based on the China Family Panel Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Ziming Bai & Tianyi Wang & Jiabin Xu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Can Agricultural Productive Services Inhibit Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Thomas Barré, 2010. "Overemployment, Underemployment and the opportunity cost of time," Working Papers halshs-00452809, HAL.
    16. Xiaocheng Wang & Chenxi Yang & Cuixia Qiao, 2024. "Agricultural Service Trade and Green Development: A Perspective Based on China’s Agricultural Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Noufé, Tiatité, 2023. "Impact of land tenure security through customary law on agricultural productivity in Burkina Faso: Propensity score matching approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499.
    19. Tom Kompas & Tuong Nhu Che & R. Quentin Grafton, 2004. "Technical efficiency effects of input controls: evidence from Australia's banana prawn fishery," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(15), pages 1631-1641.
    20. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0306055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.