IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0301860.html

Prediction of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures associated with Diabetes Mellitus type II based on clinical risk

Author

Listed:
  • Javier-Leonardo Gonzalez-Rodriguez
  • Carlos Franco
  • Olga Pinzón-Espitia
  • Vicent Caballer
  • Edgar Alfonso-Lizarazo
  • Vincent Augusto

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of different machine learning models in estimating the pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures associated with Diabetes Mellitus type II diagnosis, based on the clinical risk index determined by the analysis of comorbidities. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, we have used data from 11,028 anonymized records of patients admitted to a high-complexity hospital in Bogota, Colombia between 2017–2019 with a primary diagnosis of Diabetes. These cases were classified according to Charlson’s comorbidity index in several risk categories. The main variables analyzed in this study are hospitalization costs (which include pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures), age, gender, length of stay, medicines and services consumed, and comorbidities assessed by the Charlson’s index. The model’s dependent variable is expenditure (composed of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures). Based on these variables, different machine learning models (Multivariate linear regression, Lasso model, and Neural Networks) were used to estimate the pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures associated with the clinical risk classification. To evaluate the performance of these models, different metrics were used: Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R2). Results: The results indicate that the Neural Networks model performed better in terms of accuracy in predicting pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures considering the clinical risk based on Charlson’s comorbidity index. A deeper understanding and experimentation with Neural Networks can improve these preliminary results, therefore we can also conclude that the main variables used and those that were proposed can be used as predictors for the medical expenditures of patients with diabetes type-II. Conclusions: With the increase of technology elements and tools, it is possible to build models that allow decision-makers in hospitals to improve the resource planning process given the accuracy obtained with the different models tested.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier-Leonardo Gonzalez-Rodriguez & Carlos Franco & Olga Pinzón-Espitia & Vicent Caballer & Edgar Alfonso-Lizarazo & Vincent Augusto, 2024. "Prediction of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical expenditures associated with Diabetes Mellitus type II based on clinical risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301860
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301860
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301860&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0301860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid, R.J. & MacWilliam, l. & Verhulst, L. & Roos, N. & Atkinson, M., 2001. "Performance of the ACG Case-Mix System in Two Canadian Provinces," Centre for Health Services and Policy Research 2001:1r, University of British Columbia - Centre for Health Services and Policy Research..
    2. Caballer-Tarazona, Vicent & Guadalajara-Olmeda, Natividad & Vivas-Consuelo, David, 2019. "Predicting healthcare expenditure by multimorbidity groups," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 427-434.
    3. Vivas-Consuelo, David & Usó-Talamantes, Ruth & Trillo-Mata, José Luis & Caballer-Tarazona, Maria & Barrachina-Martínez, Isabel & Buigues-Pastor, Laia, 2014. "Predictability of pharmaceutical spending in primary health services using Clinical Risk Groups," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 188-195.
    4. Shi, Xunpeng & Wang, Keying & Cheong, Tsun Se & Zhang, Hongwu, 2020. "Prioritizing driving factors of household carbon emissions: An application of the LASSO model with survey data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caballer-Tarazona, Vicent & Guadalajara-Olmeda, Natividad & Vivas-Consuelo, David, 2019. "Predicting healthcare expenditure by multimorbidity groups," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 427-434.
    2. Maria Consuelo Company-Sancho & Víctor M. González-Chordá & María Isabel Orts-Cortés, 2022. "Variability in Healthcare Expenditure According to the Stratification of Adjusted Morbidity Groups in the Canary Islands (Spain)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Shi, Xunpeng & Tian, Binbin & Yang, Longjian & Yu, Jian & Zhou, Siyang, 2023. "How do regulatory environmental policies perform? A case study of China's Top-10,000 enterprises energy-saving program," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Jia, Jun-Jun & Ni, Jinlan & Wei, Chu, 2023. "Residential responses to service-specific electricity demand: Case of China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Gao, Xue & Chen, Xuan & Liu, Lan-Cui, 2024. "Exploring the determinants of the evolution of urban and rural household carbon footprints inequality in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Helmut Haberl & Markus Löw & Alejandro Perez-Laborda & Sarah Matej & Barbara Plank & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Felix Creutzig & Karl-Heinz Erb & Juan Antonio Duro, 2023. "Built structures influence patterns of energy demand and CO2 emissions across countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Wang, Keying & Cui, Yongyan & Zhang, Hongwu & Shi, Xunpeng & Xue, Jinjun & Yuan, Zhao, 2022. "Household carbon footprints inequality in China: Drivers, components and dynamics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Wang, Yao & Wu, Xuenan & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Empowering green households: How does digital finance influence household carbon footprints?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Xiaohui Wu & Lei Chen & Jiani Zhao & Meiling He & Xun Han, 2024. "CNN-GRU-Attention Neural Networks for Carbon Emission Prediction of Transportation in Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Silvia González-de-Julián & Isabel Barrachina-Martínez & David Vivas-Consuelo & Álvaro Bonet-Pla & Ruth Usó-Talamantes, 2021. "Data Envelopment Analysis Applications on Primary Health Care Using Exogenous Variables and Health Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Brilleman, Samuel L. & Gravelle, Hugh & Hollinghurst, Sandra & Purdy, Sarah & Salisbury, Chris & Windmeijer, Frank, 2014. "Keep it simple? Predicting primary health care costs with clinical morbidity measures," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 109-122.
    12. Jiajia Li & Yucong Liu & Houjian Li & Abbas Ali Chandio, 2021. "Heterogeneous Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions Embedded in China’s Export: An Application of the LASSO Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Chen, Peipei & Wu, Yi & Zhong, Honglin & Long, Yin & Meng, Jing, 2022. "Exploring household emission patterns and driving factors in Japan using machine learning methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    14. Amy Tawfik & Walter P. Wodchis & Petros Pechlivanoglou & Jeffrey Hoch & Don Husereau & Murray Krahn, 2016. "Using Phase-Based Costing of Real-World Data to Inform Decision–Analytic Models for Atrial Fibrillation," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 313-322, June.
    15. Sina Narimani Abar & Martin Schulwitz & Martin Faulstich, 2023. "The Impact of Urban Form and Density on Residential Energy Use: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Shumin Zhang & Yongze Lv & Jian Xu & Baolei Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emission from Energy Consumption and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhu, Zheng & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Ping, 2022. "The determinants of energy choice for household cooking in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Leslie Roos & Brett Hiebert & Phongsack Manivong & Jason Edgerton & Randy Walld & Leonard MacWilliam & Janelle Rocquigny, 2013. "What is Most Important: Social Factors, Health Selection, and Adolescent Educational Achievement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 385-414, January.
    19. Chi, Yuanying & Wu, Yuxi & Zhang, Yanzhao & Wang, Zhengzao & Zhang, Mengwan & Zhang, Xufeng, 2025. "How does household engagement in the public-welfare carbon generalized system of preferences affect household carbon emissions? Evidence from ant forest and household survey data in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Nicola Caravaggio & Raffaele Lagravinese & Giuliano Resce, 2026. "The determinants of health expenditure: a machine learning approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 1-45, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0301860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.