IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0295497.html

Evidence suggesting that reindeer mothers allonurse according to the direct reciprocity and generalized reciprocity decision rules

Author

Listed:
  • Sacha C Engelhardt
  • Robert B Weladji
  • Øystein Holand
  • Knut H Røed
  • Mauri Nieminen

Abstract

Allonursing is the nursing of the offspring of other mothers. Cooperation is an emergent property of evolved decision rules. Cooperation can be explained by at least three evolved decision rules: 1) direct reciprocity, i.e. help someone who previously helped you, 2) kin discrimination, i.e. preferentially direct help to kin than to non-kin, and 3) generalized reciprocity, i.e. help anyone if helped by someone. We assessed if semi-domesticated reindeer, Rangifer tarandus, mothers allonursed according to the decision rules of direct reciprocity, generalized reciprocity and kin discrimination over 2 years. To assess if reindeer mothers allonursed according to the direct reciprocity decision rule, we predicted that mothers should give more help to those who previously helped them more often. To assess if reindeer mothers allonursed according to the kin discrimination decision rule, we predicted that help given should increase as pairwise genetic relatedness increased. To assess if reindeer mothers allonursed according to the generalized reciprocity decision rule, we predicted that the overall number of help given by reindeer mothers should increase as the overall number of help received by reindeer mothers increased. The number of help given i) increased as the number of help received from the same partner increased in the 2012 group but not in both 2013 groups, ii) was not influenced by relatedness, and iii) was not influenced by an interaction between the number of help received from the same partner and relatedness. iv) The overall number of help given increased as the overall number of help received increased. The results did not support the prediction that reindeer mothers allonursed according to the kin discrimination decision rule. The results suggest that reindeer mothers may allonurse according to the direct reciprocity and generalized reciprocity decision rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Sacha C Engelhardt & Robert B Weladji & Øystein Holand & Knut H Røed & Mauri Nieminen, 2023. "Evidence suggesting that reindeer mothers allonurse according to the direct reciprocity and generalized reciprocity decision rules," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295497
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295497
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295497&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0295497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0011997 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. John M. McNamara & Catherine E. Gasson & Alasdair I Houston, 1999. "Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6751), pages 368-371, September.
    3. Markus Zöttl & Dik Heg & Noémie Chervet & Michael Taborsky, 2013. "Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Jeremy Field & Adam Cronin & Catherine Bridge, 2006. "Future fitness and helping in social queues," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7090), pages 214-217, May.
    5. Laurent Keller & Kenneth G. Ross, 1998. "Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6693), pages 573-575, August.
    6. Stanca, Luca, 2009. "Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 190-202, April.
    7. Wayne E. Baker & Nathaniel Bulkley, 2014. "Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1493-1510, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatsuya Sasaki & Satoshi Uchida & Isamu Okada & Hitoshi Yamamoto, 2024. "The Evolution of Cooperation and Diversity under Integrated Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Ma, Han & Velasco, Franklin & Janakiraman, Narayan & Yang, Zhiyong, 2024. "A meta-analytic investigation into the pay-it-forward phenomenon: The roles of individualism-collectivism and social distance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Lenard Strahringer & Sven Eric Pru{ss} & Kai Riemer, 2026. "Help Converts Newcomers, Not Veterans: Generalized Reciprocity and Platform Engagement on Stack Overflow," Papers 2604.03209, arXiv.org.
    4. Boudreau, Kevin J. & Jeppesen, Lars Bo & Reichstein, Toke & Rullani, Francesco, 2021. "Crowdfunding as Donations to Entrepreneurial Firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    5. Friedrich, Thomas, 2023. "A positive net profit strategy and a pure substrate transfer strategy are both necessary for an ensemble to succeed in the presence of a fixed cost," MPRA Paper 117108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Wendelin Schnedler & Nina Lucia Stephan, 2020. "Revisiting a Remedy Against Chains of Unkindness," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(3), pages 347-364, July.
    7. Stojkoski, Viktor & Karbevski, Marko & Utkovski, Zoran & Basnarkov, Lasko & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2021. "Evolution of cooperation in networked heterogeneous fluctuating environments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    8. Aaron Foote & Maryam Gooyabadi & Nikhil Addleman, 2023. "Factors in Learning Dynamics Influencing Relative Strengths of Strategies in Poker Simulation," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Boddewyn, Jean J. & Peng, Mike W., 2021. "Reciprocity and informal institutions in international market entry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    10. Philip Solimine & Luke Boosey, 2021. "Strategic formation of collaborative networks," Papers 2109.14204, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    11. Liang, Pinghan & Meng, Juanjuan, 2016. "Favor transmission and social image concern: An experimental study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 14-21.
    12. Vesa Peltokorpi & Fabian Jintae Froese & B. Sebastian Reiche & Sebastian Klar, 2022. "Reverse Knowledge Flows: How and When Do Preparation and Reintegration Facilitate Repatriate Knowledge Transfer?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1869-1893, November.
    13. Alger, Ingela & Lehmann, Laurent & Weibull, Jörgen W., 2015. "Does evolution lead to maximizing behavior?," TSE Working Papers 15-561, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    14. Fabio Galeotti & Valeria Maggian & Marie Claire Villeval, 2021. "Fraud Deterrence Institutions Reduce Intrinsic Honesty," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2508-2528.
    15. Avalos-Trujillo, Luis, 2025. "Upstream reciprocity in the battle of good vs evil," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 371-395.
    16. Kurokawa, Shun & Lessard, Sabin, 2025. "The asymmetry between spite and altruism," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 107-115.
    17. David A. Steinberg & Yeling Tan, 2023. "Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 145-167, January.
    18. Yuan-Fang Zhan & Li-Rong Long & Kong Zhou & Hai-Jiang Wang, 2023. "Feeling obliged or happy to be a good soldier? Employee cognitive and affective reactions to receiving reactive and proactive help," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 37-57, March.
    19. Annum Tariq Maan & Ghulam Abid & Tahira Hassan Butt & Fouzia Ashfaq & Saira Ahmed, 2020. "Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Hayward, Mathew & Hunt, Richard & Miller, Danny, 2022. "How vulnerability enriches family firm relationships: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.