IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0295005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information foraging with an oracle

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Gordon
  • Flavio Chierichetti
  • Alessandro Panconesi
  • Giovanni Pezzulo

Abstract

During ecological decisions, such as when foraging for food or selecting a weekend activity, we often have to balance the costs and benefits of exploiting known options versus exploring novel ones. Here, we ask how individuals address such cost-benefit tradeoffs during tasks in which we can either explore by ourselves or seek external advice from an oracle (e.g., a domain expert or recommendation system). To answer this question, we designed two studies in which participants chose between inquiring (at a cost) for expert advice from an oracle, or to search for options without guidance, under manipulations affecting the optimal choice. We found that participants showed a greater propensity to seek expert advice when it was instrumental to increase payoff (study A), and when it reduced choice uncertainty, above and beyond payoff maximization (study B). This latter result was especially apparent in participants with greater trait-level intolerance of uncertainty. Taken together, these results suggest that we seek expert advice for both economic goals (i.e., payoff maximization) and epistemic goals (i.e., uncertainty minimization) and that our decisions to ask or not ask for advice are sensitive to cost-benefit tradeoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Gordon & Flavio Chierichetti & Alessandro Panconesi & Giovanni Pezzulo, 2023. "Information foraging with an oracle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295005
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295005&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0295005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathaniel D. Daw & John P. O'Doherty & Peter Dayan & Ben Seymour & Raymond J. Dolan, 2006. "Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7095), pages 876-879, June.
    2. Charley M. Wu & Eric Schulz & Maarten Speekenbrink & Jonathan D. Nelson & Björn Meder, 2018. "Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spaces," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 915-924, December.
    3. Christopher Anderson, 2012. "Ambiguity aversion in multi-armed bandit problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 15-33, January.
    4. Kenji Kobayashi & Silvio Ravaioli & Adrien Baranès & Michael Woodford & Jacqueline Gottlieb, 2019. "Diverse motives for human curiosity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(6), pages 587-595, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Yingyao & Kayaba, Yutaka & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it!," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 215-231.
    2. Anna P. Giron & Simon Ciranka & Eric Schulz & Wouter Bos & Azzurra Ruggeri & Björn Meder & Charley M. Wu, 2023. "Developmental changes in exploration resemble stochastic optimization," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1955-1967, November.
    3. Farid Anvari & Stephan Billinger & Pantelis P. Analytis & Vithor Rosa Franco & Davide Marchiori, 2024. "Testing the convergent validity, domain generality, and temporal stability of selected measures of people’s tendency to explore," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Rachit Dubey & Thomas L Griffiths & Peter Dayan, 2022. "The pursuit of happiness: A reinforcement learning perspective on habituation and comparisons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Shinji Nakazato & Bojian Yang & Tetsuya Shimokawa, 2024. "Analyzing Human Search Behavior When Subjective Returns are Unobservable," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(5), pages 1921-1947, May.
    6. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    7. Peter S. Riefer & Bradley C. Love, 2015. "Unfazed by Both the Bull and Bear: Strategic Exploration in Dynamic Environments," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Makoto Naruse & Eiji Yamamoto & Takashi Nakao & Takuma Akimoto & Hayato Saigo & Kazuya Okamura & Izumi Ojima & Georg Northoff & Hirokazu Hori, 2018. "Why is the environment important for decision making? Local reservoir model for choice-based learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Christina Fang & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Near-Term Liability of Exploitation: Exploration and Exploitation in Multistage Problems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 538-551, June.
    10. Olschewski, Sebastian & Diao, Linan & Rieskamp, Jörg, 2021. "Reinforcement learning about asset variability and correlation in repeated portfolio decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    11. Elise Payzan-LeNestour & Peter Bossaerts, 2011. "Risk, Unexpected Uncertainty, and Estimation Uncertainty: Bayesian Learning in Unstable Settings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Nancy Garon & Ellen Doucet & Bronwyn Inness, 2024. "Decomposing decision-making in preschoolers: Making decisions under ambiguity versus risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-31, September.
    13. Ian Krajbich & Todd Hare & Björn Bartling & Yosuke Morishima & Ernst Fehr, 2015. "A Common Mechanism Underlying Food Choice and Social Decisions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Magda Dubois & Tobias U. Hauser, 2022. "Value-free random exploration is linked to impulsivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Farzad Pourbabaee, 2022. "Robust experimentation in the continuous time bandit problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(1), pages 151-181, February.
    16. Maël Lebreton & Karin Bacily & Stefano Palminteri & Jan B Engelmann, 2019. "Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Beren Millidge & Mufeng Tang & Mahyar Osanlouy & Nicol S Harper & Rafal Bogacz, 2024. "Predictive coding networks for temporal prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-31, April.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:691-719 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Ahmed H. Alsharif & Nor Zafir Md Salleh & Rohaizat Baharun & Alharthi Rami Hashem E & Aida Azlina Mansor & Javed Ali & Alhamzah F. Abbas, 2021. "Neuroimaging Techniques in Advertising Research: Main Applications, Development, and Brain Regions and Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Aaron J Gruber & Rifat J Hussain & Patricio O'Donnell, 2009. "The Nucleus Accumbens: A Switchboard for Goal-Directed Behaviors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-10, April.
    21. repec:osf:osfxxx:x2cv8_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:5:p:823-850 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Phanish Puranam & Murali Swamy, 2016. "How Initial Representations Shape Coupled Learning Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 323-335, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.