IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0294757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affinity, value homophily, and opinion dynamics: The coevolution between affinity and opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Miao He
  • Xiaoming John Zhang

Abstract

We propose two analytical relationships between affinity and opinion change. The first one focuses on value homophily, while the second one incorporates affinity in opinion dynamics. Three analytical test models are derived based on these relationships: the value homophily model, the temporal evolution of opinion summation, and the evolution of opinion difference between two individuals. We test these models using data from a previous experiment, and the results demonstrate their validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao He & Xiaoming John Zhang, 2023. "Affinity, value homophily, and opinion dynamics: The coevolution between affinity and opinion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294757
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294757
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294757&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0294757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Lozares & Joan Verd & Irene Cruz & Oriol Barranco, 2014. "Homophily and heterophily in personal networks. From mutual acquaintance to relationship intensity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2657-2670, September.
    2. Li-Chen Cheng & Chi-Lun Huang, 2020. "Exploring contextual factors from consumer reviews affecting movie sales: an opinion mining approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 807-832, December.
    3. Elisabeth R. Gerber & Adam Douglas Henry & Mark Lubell, 2013. "Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 598-610, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kayvan Sadeghi & Alessandro Rinaldo, 2020. "Hierarchical models for independence structures of networks," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 439-457, August.
    2. Pietro Previtali & Eugenio Salvati, 2021. "Area Social Plans and Local Governance of Interorganizational Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Ladan Ghahramani & Jalayer Khalilzadeh & Birendra KC, 2018. "Tour guides’ communication ecosystems: an inferential social network analysis approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 103-130, December.
    4. Mustak, Mekhail & Hallikainen, Heli & Laukkanen, Tommi & Plé, Loïc & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Aleem, Majid, 2024. "Using machine learning to develop customer insights from user-generated content," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Minsun Song, 2018. "Does having a strong commitment matter in building sustainable networks?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 551-564, March.
    6. Sciara, Gian-Claudia & Rahman, Mashrur & Walthall, Rydell, 2021. "A seat at the table? Transit representation in U.S. metropolitan planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 165-173.
    7. Coloma à lvarez Santamaría & Consuelo Riaño Gil & Agustín V. Ruiz Vega, 2024. "The Power of Social Commerce: Understanding the Role of Social Word-of-Mouth Behaviors and Flow Experience on Social Media Users’ Purchase Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    8. Magontier, Pierre & Solé-Ollé, Albert & Viladecans-Marsal, Elisabet, 2024. "The political economy of coastal development," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    9. Joanna Ganning, 2023. "Quantifying the impacts of suburbanization without growth on central city housing vacancy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 1002-1018, December.
    10. Dennis Abel & Armin Mertens, 2024. "United in disagreement: Analyzing policy networks in EU policy making," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(1), pages 59-82, January.
    11. Oriol Barranco & Carlos Lozares & Dafne Muntanyola-Saura, 2019. "Heterophily in social groups formation: a social network analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 599-619, March.
    12. Eric Zeemering, 2016. "Assessing local elected officials’ concerns about interlocal agreements," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2347-2362, August.
    13. Soyoung Kim & Woo-Je Kim & Richard Clark Feiock, 2021. "An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Federico Holm & Ramiro Berardo, 2020. "Coalitional Architecture of Climate Change Litigation Networks in the United States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 797-822, November.
    15. William Fries, 2023. "What motivated mitigation policies? A network-based longitudinal analysis of state-level mitigation strategies," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 803-815, October.
    16. Sciara, Gian-Claudia & Strand, Sarah, 2017. "When Do Local Governments Regulate Land Use to Serve Regional Goals? Results of a Survey Tracking Land Use Changes that Support Sustainable Mobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0qr4350c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Ignacio Ramos-Vidal, 2022. "Structural Cohesion, Role Equivalence, or Homophily: Which Process Best Explains Social Homogeneity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Minsun Song & Joungyoon Hwang & Namhoon Ki, 2024. "How perceived risks in interorganizational collaboration shape disaster response strategies," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 170-184, August.
    19. Ngai, Eric W.T. & Wu, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Machine learning in marketing: A literature review, conceptual framework, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 35-48.
    20. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2016. "Six degrees of cultural diversity and R&D output efficiency," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 247-264, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.