IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292852.html

Public attitudes towards dialects: Evidence from 31 Chinese provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxin Li
  • Xigang Ke
  • Jin Li

Abstract

Background: Dialect Attitude is conceptualized as an individual’s cognitive and affective evaluation of a dialect and its speakers. In the contemporary China, dialect is suffering from significant stigmatization, resulting in social inequalities, which hinder sustainable development. This study aims to reveal the Chinese public attitudes towards dialects, and clarify the potential determinants related to heterogeneous attitudes at a macro level. Methods: We combine the crawler technology and sentiment analysis to conduct a provincial cross-sectional study. We collect 1,650,480 microblogs about public attitudes towards dialects from Microblog across 31 specific Chinese provinces. Spatial regression models are utilized to clarify the influence of macro-level determinants on differences in public attitudes. Results: The present study reveals that: (1) The Chinese public generally holds positive attitudes towards dialects, with significant variation between provinces. (2) Political Resource (β = 0.076, SD = 0.036, P

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxin Li & Xigang Ke & Jin Li, 2023. "Public attitudes towards dialects: Evidence from 31 Chinese provinces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292852
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292852
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292852&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Frankel & Jared Jennings & Joshua Lee, 2022. "Disclosure Sentiment: Machine Learning vs. Dictionary Methods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5514-5532, July.
    2. Yingxia Xue & Honglei Liu, 2023. "Exploration of the Dynamic Evolution of Online Public Opinion towards Waste Classification in Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirtac, Kemal & Germano, Guido, 2024. "Sentiment trading with large language models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    2. Lachana, Ioanna & Schröder, David, 2025. "Investor sentiment and stock returns: Wisdom of crowds or power of words? Evidence from Seeking Alpha and Wall Street Journal," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Slonimczyk, Fabian, 2025. "This Candidate is [MASK]. Prompt-based Sentiment Extraction and Reference Letters," MPRA Paper 126675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Todd, Andrew & Bowden, James & Cummins, Mark & Su, Yang, 2025. "A multimodal sentiment classifier for financial decision making," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Qiu, Yue & Xie, Tian & Xie, Wenjing & Zheng, Xiangzhong, 2023. "Federal policy announcements and capital reallocation: Insights from inflow and outflow trends in the U.S," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Kai Chang & Shuqi Wei & Guangxi Wei, 2025. "Impact of Green Transformation on Corporate Sustainable Development Performance in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    7. Alex Kim & Maximilian Muhn & Valeri Nikolaev, 2023. "Bloated Disclosures: Can ChatGPT Help Investors Process Information?," Papers 2306.10224, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    8. Fang, Yue & Luo, Deming & Yao, Zhongwei, 2024. "Belief dispersion in the Chinese stock market and fund flows," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Basha, Shabeen Afsar & Benkraiem, Ramzi & Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Masum, Abdullah-Al, 2025. "Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    10. Ray, Rajeev Kumar & Singh, Amit, 2025. "From online reviews to smartwatch recommendation: An integrated aspect-based sentiment analysis framework," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Bertomeu, Jeremy & Cheynel, Edwige & Hu, Peicong, 2026. "Disclosure under noisy information processing," MPRA Paper 128905, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Chiu, I-Chan & Hung, Mao-Wei, 2025. "Finance-specific large language models: Advancing sentiment analysis and return prediction with LLaMA 2," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Zhang, Shengpeng & Li, Yaokuang & Liang, Ruixin & He, Yu, 2024. "Does management tone matter in information disclosure? Evidence from IPO online roadshows in the SSE STAR market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Jurkšas, Linas & Kaminskas, Rokas, 2025. "Communication of ECB Governing Council members: Impact on intraday financial markets from media messages," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    15. Li Zhao & Nathee Naktnasukanjn & Ahmad Yahya Dawod & Bin Zhang, 2024. "Impacts of Investor Attention and Accounting Information Comparability on Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Sungjae Yoon & Hiroshi Takahashi, 2025. "Intraday Trading Dynamics of Characteristics and Sentiment Tendencies of Past News in the Tokyo Stock Exchange Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(5), pages 3983-4007, November.
    17. Fabozzi, Francesco A. & Nazemi, Abdolreza, 2023. "News-based sentiment and the value premium," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Fengler, Matthias R. & Phan, Tri Minh, 2025. "Unveiling themes in 10-K disclosures: A new topic modeling perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Fan, Siyu & Kong, Dongmin & Wu, Yifei & Yu, Honghai, 2025. "Digital innovation and supply chain risk: A large language model-based analysis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Düsterhöft, Maximilian & Schiemann, Frank & Walther, Thomas, 2023. "Let’s talk about risk! Stock market effects of risk disclosure for European energy utilities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.