IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290147.html

Never Too Much—More talent in football (always) leads to more success

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley M Long
  • Mario Graf
  • Merim Bilalić

Abstract

Though it may appear counterintuitive, certain positive attributes can eventually have negative consequences when taken to an extreme. This concept is exemplified in sports, where an increase in talent among team members initially leads to improved success, but beyond a certain threshold, excessive talent can adversely affect the team. This occurrence is known as the Too Much Talent (TMT) effect, wherein status conflicts among highly skilled players can hinder team performance, particularly in sports that require coordination and cooperation. While early evidence supported the TMT effect in team sports, its validity has recently been challenged. In this study, we analyzed a comprehensive dataset consisting of 780 data points across 42 seasons from seven top European football (soccer) leagues to examine the TMT effect’s presence. Our findings reveal that football does not exhibit the TMT effect. Instead, we observed a consistent, positive correlation between the number of skilled players on a team and team success. Additionally, talent did not display diminishing returns, as its impact on success remained stable even at the highest concentrations of talent. We relate our results to existing theories and propose that future research comparing more individualistic and interdependent team sports could further enhance the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley M Long & Mario Graf & Merim Bilalić, 2024. "Never Too Much—More talent in football (always) leads to more success," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290147
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290147&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corinne Bendersky & Nicholas A. Hays, 2012. "Status Conflict in Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 323-340, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    2. Qiwei Zhou & Shuang Cheng & Feiqiang Fu & Jingmin Zhang & Yingxu Jiang, 2025. "Enterprise digital transformation as a double-edged sword for employees: an investigation based on the Job Demands-Resources model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Maartje E. Schouten & Daan van Knippenberg & Lindred L. Greer, 2024. "Hierarchy Conflict: Causes, Expressions, and Consequences," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1535-1551, July.
    4. Shuhua Sun, 2022. "Is Political Skill Always Beneficial? Why and When Politically Skilled Employees Become Targets of Coworker Social Undermining," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1142-1162, May.
    5. Matteo Prato & Fabrizio Ferraro, 2018. "Starstruck: How Hiring High-Status Employees Affects Incumbents’ Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 755-774, October.
    6. Dongao Li & Songdong Shen, 2022. "Social Environment and Healthy Investment Behavior: Joint Influence of Culture and Institution on China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. H. Colleen Stuart, 2017. "Structural Disruption, Relational Experimentation, and Performance in Professional Hockey Teams: A Network Perspective on Member Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 283-300, April.
    8. Kilduff, Gavin J. & Anderson, Cameron & Willer, Robb, 2013. "Consensus and Contribution: Shared Status Hierarchies Promote Group Success," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt77q7n684, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    9. Matthew Beane & Callen Anthony, 2024. "Inverted Apprenticeship: How Senior Occupational Members Develop Practical Expertise and Preserve Their Position When New Technologies Arrive," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 405-431, March.
    10. Andy J. Yap & Nikhil Madan & Phanish Puranam, 2022. "Formal Hierarchy As a Source of Upward Status Disagreement? A Theoretical Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 464-482, January.
    11. Nikola Rosecká & Ondřej Machek, 2022. "Non-family members and conflict processes in family firms: a systematic review of literature," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 235-281, February.
    12. Hanna Maria Sievinen & Tuuli Ikäheimonen & Timo Pihkala, 2022. "The role of dyadic interactions between CEOs, chairs and owners in family firm governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(1), pages 223-253, March.
    13. Anne Laure Humbert & Elisabeth Anna Guenther & Jörg Müller, 2021. "Not Simply ‘Counting Heads’: A Gender Diversity Index for the Team Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 689-707, September.
    14. Caviggioli, Federico & Colombelli, Alessandra & Ravetti, Chiara, 2022. "Peers and stars: the role of gender among coinventors," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 202201, University of Turin.
    15. Jacqueline N. Lane & Misha Teplitskiy & Gary Gray & Hardeep Ranu & Michael Menietti & Eva C. Guinan & Karim R. Lakhani, 2022. "Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4478-4495, June.
    16. Jiunyan Wu & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2020. "A multilevel and dynamic model of intragroup conflict and decision making: application of agent-based modeling," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Shengming Liu & Ning Li & Hui Wang & Zhen Wang & Jiayi Du, 2025. "Is an informal leader always popular? The curvilinear relationships between informal leadership, threat to peers, and helping from peers," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 745-776, June.
    18. Chang, Jin Wook & Chow, Rosalind M. & Woolley, Anita W., 2017. "Effects of inter-group status on the pursuit of intra-group status," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-17.
    19. Along Liu & Hefu Liu & Jibao Gu & Meng Chen & Chenglin Jin, 2024. "Business Model Implementation of New Ventures: Linking TMT Process Antecedents, Organizational Culture, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(3), pages 826-855, May.
    20. Nicholas A. Hays & Huisi (Jessica) Li & Xue Yang & Jo K. Oh & Andrew Yu & Ya-Ru Chen & John R. Hollenbeck & Bradley B. Jamieson, 2022. "A Tale of Two Hierarchies: Interactive Effects of Power Differentiation and Status Differentiation on Team Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2085-2105, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.