IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0268923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graduate students locked down? PhD students’ satisfaction with supervision during the first and second COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • Theun Pieter van Tienoven
  • Anaïs Glorieux
  • Joeri Minnen
  • Petrus te Braak
  • Bram Spruyt

Abstract

Background: Supervisor support is crucial for the successful and timely completion of the PhD and the largest contributor to PhD students’ overall job satisfaction. The COVID-19 pandemic affected PhD students’ life substantially through delayed experiments, missed timelines, running out of funding, change to online team- and supervisor meetings, mandatory working from home, and social confinement. Aim: This contribution considers PhD students’ satisfaction scores to reflect the extent to which PhD students felt supported by their supervisor during the COVID-19 pandemic so far and aims to investigate to what extent did PhD students’ satisfaction with supervisor support changed over time. Method: It uses two longitudinal two cohorts of wave 4 to 5 of the PhD Survey at a Belgian university. These cohorts are representative of two different ways the COVID-19 pandemic might have impacted doctoral research. Cohort 1 (n = 345) includes a pre-COVID measurement (April-May 2019) and a measurement immediately after the start of the abrupt lockdown in April-May 2020. Cohort 2 (n = 349) includes the measurement at the onset of the pandemic in 2020 and after a year with continuously changing containment policies (April-May 2021). The composite measure of satisfaction with supervisor support is based on six items with high internal consistency. Results: No significant net effect of time was revealed. Instead within subject interactions with time showed that in cohort 1, PhD students at the start of their PhD trajectory and PhD students with family responsibilities reported lower supervisor satisfaction scores over time. In cohort 2, PhD students not pursuing academic careers reported lower satisfaction scores over time. Conclusion: In times of crises, special attention needs to be paid to PhD students who are extra susceptible to uncertainties because of their junior status or personal situation, and especially those PhD students for whom doctoral research is not a trajectory to position themselves in academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Theun Pieter van Tienoven & Anaïs Glorieux & Joeri Minnen & Petrus te Braak & Bram Spruyt, 2022. "Graduate students locked down? PhD students’ satisfaction with supervision during the first and second COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0268923
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268923
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268923&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0268923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyn Craig & Brendan Churchill, 2021. "Working and Caring at Home: Gender Differences in the Effects of Covid-19 on Paid and Unpaid Labor in Australia," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-2), pages 310-326, April.
    2. Halima Ahmed Omar & Eqlima Mohamad Ali & Shashidhar Belbase, 2021. "Graduate Students’ Experience and Academic Achievements with Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Aldraiweesh & Uthman Alturki, 2023. "Exploring Factors Influencing the Acceptance of E-Learning and Students’ Cooperation Skills in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Ana Tribin & Karen García-Rojas & Paula Herrera-Idarraga & Leonardo Fabio Morales & Natalia Ramirez-Bustamante, 2023. "Shecession: The Downfall of Colombian Women During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 158-193, October.
    3. Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh, 2023. "The Factors Influencing 21st Century Skills and Problem-Solving Skills: The Acceptance of Blackboard as Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Kohnert, Dirk, 2021. "L'impact socio-économique du Brexit sur CANZUK et l'Anglosphère lors de la pandémie COVID-19 : Le cas du Canada, de l'Australie et de la Nouvelle-Zélande [The socio-economic impact of Brexit on CAN," MPRA Paper 108043, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Alison Andrew & Sarah Cattan & Monica Costa Dias & Christine Farquharson & Lucy Kraftman & Sonya Krutikova & Angus Phimister & Almudena Sevilla, 2022. "The gendered division of paid and domestic work under lockdown," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 325-340, December.
    6. Chakraborty, Lekha S, 2022. "Covid19 and Fiscal Policy for Unpaid Care Economy," MPRA Paper 111925, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Rouselle F. LAVADO & Keiko NOWACKA & David A. RAITZER & Yana van der Meulen RODGERS & Joseph E. ZVEGLICH, 2022. "COVID‐19 disparities by gender and income: Evidence from the Philippines," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(1), pages 107-123, March.
    8. Marta Pasqualini & Marta Dominguez Folgueras & Emanuele Ferragina & Olivier Godechot & Ettore Recchi & Mirna Safi, 2022. "Who took care of what? The gender division of unpaid work during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in France," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(34), pages 1007-1036.
    9. Corsi, Marcella & Ilkkaracan, Ipek, 2022. "COVID-19, Gender and Labour," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1012, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Maria Victoria Uribe Bohorquez & Isabel María García Sánchez, 2023. "Sustainability in times of crisis: Female employment during COVID‐19," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3124-3139, November.
    11. Hensher, David A. & Balbontin, Camila & Beck, Matthew J. & Wei, Edward, 2024. "Commuting mode choice and work from home in the later stages of COVID-19: Consolidating a future focussed prediction tool to inform transport and land use planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Saeid Asgharzadehbonab & Arif Akkeleş & Hasan Ozder, 2022. "Students’ Academic Performance and Perceptions towards Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Public University in Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Igor Jacky Dimitri Michaleczek & Fatma Kayan-Fadlelmula & Abdel Latif Sellami, 2022. "Research on Higher Education during the COVID-19 in the Gulf Cooperation Council: An Overview of Publications in the Journal Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Zhengyu Cai & John V. Winters, 2024. "Income and Fertility of Female College Graduates in the United States," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 479-498, December.
    15. Katherine Pawluk De-Toledo & Steve O’Hern & Sjaan Koppel, 2024. "A social-ecological model of working from home during COVID-19," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1181-1208, August.
    16. Adá-Lameiras, Alba & Antonovica, Arta & de Esteban Curiel, Javier & Aydogan, Merve, 2024. "The impact of health crisis on sports consumption – A longitudinal study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Andrea Doucet & Janna Klostermann, 2024. "What and How are we Measuring When we Research Gendered Divisions of Domestic Labor? Remaking the Household Portrait Method into a Care/Work Portrait," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 243-263, March.
    18. Florencia Amábile & Marisa Bucheli & Cecilia González & Cecilia Lara, 2021. "Gender differences in domestic work during COVID19 in Uruguay," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1221, Department of Economics - dECON.
    19. José Ignacio Giménez-Nadal & José Alberto Molina & Jorge Velilla, 2023. "Should We Cheer Together? Gender Differences in Instantaneous Well-being: An Application to COVID-19 Lockdowns," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 529-562, February.
    20. Kohnert, Dirk, 2021. "The socio-economic impact of Brexit on CANZUK and the Anglosphere in times of Corona : The case of Canada, Australia and New Zealand," MPRA Paper 107991, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0268923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.