IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0108987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Validity of Job Exposure Matrix for Psychosocial Factors at Work

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Solovieva
  • Tiina Pensola
  • Johanna Kausto
  • Rahman Shiri
  • Markku Heliövaara
  • Alex Burdorf
  • Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen
  • Eira Viikari-Juntura

Abstract

Objective: To study the performance of a developed job exposure matrix (JEM) for the assessment of psychosocial factors at work in terms of accuracy, possible misclassification bias and predictive ability to detect known associations with depression and low back pain (LBP). Materials and Methods: We utilized two large population surveys (the Health 2000 Study and the Finnish Work and Health Surveys), one to construct the JEM and another to test matrix performance. In the first study, information on job demands, job control, monotonous work and social support at work was collected via face-to-face interviews. Job strain was operationalized based on job demands and job control using quadrant approach. In the second study, the sensitivity and specificity were estimated applying a Bayesian approach. The magnitude of misclassification error was examined by calculating the biased odds ratios as a function of the sensitivity and specificity of the JEM and fixed true prevalence and odds ratios. Finally, we adjusted for misclassification error the observed associations between JEM measures and selected health outcomes. Results: The matrix showed a good accuracy for job control and job strain, while its performance for other exposures was relatively low. Without correction for exposure misclassification, the JEM was able to detect the association between job strain and depression in men and between monotonous work and LBP in both genders. Conclusions: Our results suggest that JEM more accurately identifies occupations with low control and high strain than those with high demands or low social support. Overall, the present JEM is a useful source of job-level psychosocial exposures in epidemiological studies lacking individual-level exposure information. Furthermore, we showed the applicability of a Bayesian approach in the evaluation of the performance of the JEM in a situation where, in practice, no gold standard of exposure assessment exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Solovieva & Tiina Pensola & Johanna Kausto & Rahman Shiri & Markku Heliövaara & Alex Burdorf & Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen & Eira Viikari-Juntura, 2014. "Evaluation of the Validity of Job Exposure Matrix for Psychosocial Factors at Work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0108987
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108987
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108987&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0108987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwartz, J.E. & Pieper, C.F. & Karasek, R.A., 1988. "A procedure for linking psychosocial job characteristics data to health surveys," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(8), pages 904-909.
    2. Johnson, J.V. & Hall, E.M., 1988. "Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of random sample of the Swedish Working Population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(10), pages 1336-1342.
    3. Svetlana Solovieva & Irmeli Pehkonen & Johanna Kausto & Helena Miranda & Rahman Shiri & Timo Kauppinen & Markku Heliövaara & Alex Burdorf & Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen & Eira Viikari-Juntura, 2012. "Development and Validation of a Job Exposure Matrix for Physical Risk Factors in Low Back Pain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    4. Theorell, T. & Tsutsumi, A. & Hallquist, J. & Reuterwall, C. & Hogstedt, C. & Fredlund, P. & Emlund, N. & Johnson, J.V., 1998. "Decision latitude, job strain, and myocardial infarction: A study of working men in Stockholm," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(3), pages 382-388.
    5. Lang, Jessica & Ochsmann, Elke & Kraus, Thomas & Lang, Jonas W.B., 2012. "Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1163-1174.
    6. Isabelle Niedhammer & Jean-François Chastang & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb & Greet Vermeylen & Agnès Parent-Thirion, 2013. "Psychosocial work factors and sickness absence in 31 countries in Europe," Post-Print halshs-01228084, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belloni, Michele & Carrino, Ludovico & Meschi, Elena, 2022. "The impact of working conditions on mental health: Novel evidence from the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Ludovico Carrino & Karen Glaser & Mauricio Avendano, 2020. "Later retirement, job strain, and health: Evidence from the new State Pension age in the United Kingdom," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), pages 891-912, August.
    3. Taina Leinonen & Svetlana Solovieva & Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen & Mikko Laaksonen & Eira Viikari-Juntura, 2019. "Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bubonya, Melisa & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Wooden, Mark, 2017. "Mental health and productivity at work: Does what you do matter?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-165.
    2. Sara Lourenço & Filomena Carnide & Fernando G Benavides & Raquel Lucas, 2015. "Psychosocial Work Environment and Musculoskeletal Symptoms among 21-Year-Old Workers: A Population-Based Investigation (2011-2013)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Jan Olav Christensen & Morten Birkeland Nielsen & Live Bakke Finne & Stein Knardahl, 2019. "Human resource primacy, dispositional optimism, and chest pain: A prospective, cross-lagged study of work, personality, and health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Hannah Carver & Tracey Price & Danilo Falzon & Peter McCulloch & Tessa Parkes, 2022. "Stress and Wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Frontline Homelessness Services Staff Experiences in Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Rémi Colin-Chevalier & Bruno Pereira & Amanda Clare Benson & Samuel Dewavrin & Thomas Cornet & Frédéric Dutheil, 2022. "The Protective Role of Job Control/Autonomy on Mental Strain of Managers: A Cross-Sectional Study among Wittyfit’s Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
    6. Sebastiano, Antonio & Belvedere, Valeria & Grando, Alberto & Giangreco, Antonio, 2017. "The effect of capacity management strategies on employees' well-being: A quantitative investigation into the long-term healthcare industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 563-573.
    7. Suzuki, Etsuji & Takao, Soshi & Subramanian, S.V. & Komatsu, Hirokazu & Doi, Hiroyuki & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2010. "Does low workplace social capital have detrimental effect on workers' health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1367-1372, May.
    8. Akiomi Inoue & Hisashi Eguchi & Yuko Kachi & Sarven S. McLinton & Maureen F. Dollard & Akizumi Tsutsumi, 2021. "Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the 12-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale (PSC-12J)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    10. Huizing, Anna R. & Hamers, Jan P.H. & de Jonge, Jan & Candel, Math & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2007. "Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 924-933, September.
    11. Rosie Mulholland & Andy McKinlay & John Sproule, 2013. "Teacher Interrupted," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440135, September.
    12. Cäker, Mikael & Siverbo, Sven, 2018. "Effects of performance measurement system inconsistency on managers’ role clarity and well-being," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-266.
    13. Myra Sader & Barthélemy Chollet & Sébastien Brion & Olivier Trendel, 2021. "Supported, detached, or marginalized? The ambivalent role of social capital on stress at work," Post-Print hal-03167159, HAL.
    14. Beatriz Talavera-Velasco & Lourdes Luceño-Moreno & Jesús Martín García & Daniel Vázquez-Estévez, 2018. "DECORE-21: Assessment of occupational stress in police. Confirmatory factor analysis of the original model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, October.
    15. Lea Sell & Bryan Cleal, 2011. "Job Satisfaction, Work Environment, and Rewards: Motivational Theory Revisited," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Christina Björklund & Therese Hellman & Irene Jensen & Cecilia Åkerblom & Elisabeth Björk Brämberg, 2019. "Workplace Bullying as Experienced by Managers and How They Cope: A Qualitative Study of Swedish Managers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Taina Leinonen & Svetlana Solovieva & Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen & Mikko Laaksonen & Eira Viikari-Juntura, 2019. "Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Fujishiro, Kaori & Xu, Jun & Gong, Fang, 2010. "What does "occupation" represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: Exploring occupational prestige and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(12), pages 2100-2107, December.
    19. Alexander Matros & Vladimir Smirnov & Andrew Wait & Helen Zhang, 2023. "Microfoundations of work intensification and burnout," Working Papers 2023-02, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    20. Grimani, Katerina, 2014. "Labor earnings and Psychological well-being: An Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 57098, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0108987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.