IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v65y2007i5p924-933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: A multilevel approach

Author

Listed:
  • Huizing, Anna R.
  • Hamers, Jan P.H.
  • de Jonge, Jan
  • Candel, Math
  • Berger, Martijn P.F.

Abstract

This paper reports a study of the relationship between the use of physical restraints with psycho-geriatric nursing home residents and the characteristics of organisations and residents. It is hypothesised that impairment in residents and organisational characteristics, such as a high workload of nursing staff and a low full-time equivalent (FTE) ratio on the wards, are associated with increased restraint use. In a cross-sectional study involving 15 Dutch psycho-geriatric nursing home wards, 432 residents were selected for participation, of which 371 actually participated. Restraint status was measured using observations. Other resident characteristics, such as cognitive status, were determined using the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Job characteristics, such as workload, were determined by different self-reported measures. Characteristics of the wards, such as the FTE ratio, were derived from the registration system of the wards. Physical restraints were used with 56% of the psycho-geriatric nursing home residents. Bivariate analysis showed that job and ward characteristics were not associated with restraint use. Bivariate and multilevel analysis showed that residents' characteristics, such as mobility and cognitive status were significantly associated with restraint use. Furthermore, multilevel analysis showed that higher job autonomy experienced by nursing staff and a higher FTE ratio on the wards were also associated with increased restraint use. In conclusion, job and ward characteristics were not as strongly associated as residents' characteristics with restraint use. Impairments in residents, such as immobility, were strongly related to the use of restraints. Therefore, education and support of nursing staff in caring for psycho-geriatric nursing home residents with poor mobility is recommended to reduce the use of physical restraints in nursing homes.

Suggested Citation

  • Huizing, Anna R. & Hamers, Jan P.H. & de Jonge, Jan & Candel, Math & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2007. "Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 924-933, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:5:p:924-933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00233-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, J.V. & Hall, E.M., 1988. "Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of random sample of the Swedish Working Population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(10), pages 1336-1342.
    2. de Jonge, Jan & Mulder, Marike J. G. P. & Nijhuis, Frans J. N., 1999. "The incorporation of different demand concepts in the job demand-control model: effects on health care professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1149-1160, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Acevedo-Nuevo & María Teresa González-Gil & María Concepción Martin-Arribas, 2021. "Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-36, November.
    2. Christine Øye & Frode Fadnes Jacobsen & Tone Elin Mekki, 2017. "Do organisational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1906-1916, July.
    3. Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2010. "Nursing staff perceptions of the use of physical restraint in institutional care of older people in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3197-3207, November.
    4. Elisa Ambrosi & Martina Debiasi & Jessica Longhini & Lorenzo Giori & Luisa Saiani & Elisabetta Mezzalira & Federica Canzan, 2021. "Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Hedi Hofmann & Sabine Hahn, 2014. "Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3012-3024, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virginia Navajas-Romero & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Felipe Hernández-Perlines, 2020. "Analyzing the Job Demands-Control-Support Model in Work-Life Balance: A Study among Nurses in the European Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Hannah Carver & Tracey Price & Danilo Falzon & Peter McCulloch & Tessa Parkes, 2022. "Stress and Wellbeing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Frontline Homelessness Services Staff Experiences in Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Suzuki, Etsuji & Takao, Soshi & Subramanian, S.V. & Komatsu, Hirokazu & Doi, Hiroyuki & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2010. "Does low workplace social capital have detrimental effect on workers' health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1367-1372, May.
    4. Akiomi Inoue & Hisashi Eguchi & Yuko Kachi & Sarven S. McLinton & Maureen F. Dollard & Akizumi Tsutsumi, 2021. "Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the 12-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale (PSC-12J)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Rosie Mulholland & Andy McKinlay & John Sproule, 2013. "Teacher Interrupted," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440135, September.
    7. Myra Sader & Barthélemy Chollet & Sébastien Brion & Olivier Trendel, 2021. "Supported, detached, or marginalized? The ambivalent role of social capital on stress at work," Post-Print hal-03167159, HAL.
    8. Lea Sell & Bryan Cleal, 2011. "Job Satisfaction, Work Environment, and Rewards: Motivational Theory Revisited," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Fujishiro, Kaori & Xu, Jun & Gong, Fang, 2010. "What does "occupation" represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: Exploring occupational prestige and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(12), pages 2100-2107, December.
    10. Alexander Matros & Vladimir Smirnov & Andrew Wait & Helen Zhang, 2023. "Microfoundations of work intensification and burnout," Working Papers 2023-02, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    11. Lutz Bellmann & Olaf Hübler, 2022. "Personality traits, working conditions and health: an empirical analysis based on the German Linked Personnel Panel, 2013–2017," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 283-318, February.
    12. Rugulies, Reiner & Krause, Niklas, 2005. "Job strain, iso-strain, and the incidence of low back and neck injuries. A 7.5-year prospective study of San Francisco transit operators," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 27-39, July.
    13. Karin Anne Peter & Sabine Hahn & Jos M. G. A. Schols & Ruud J. G. Halfens, 2020. "Work‐related stress among health professionals in Swiss acute care and rehabilitation hospitals—A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 3064-3081, August.
    14. Leonard Bright, 2022. "Why Does PSM Lead to Higher Work Stress? Exploring the Role that Organizational Identity Theory has on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and External-Related Stress among Federal Gove," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 803-820, September.
    15. José-Joaquín del-Pozo-Antúnez & Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Francisco Fernández-Navarro & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Accountancy as a Meaningful Work. Main Determinants from a Job Quality and Optimization Algorithm Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Miranti, Riyana & Li, Jinjing, 2020. "Working hours mismatch, job strain and mental health among mature age workers in Australia," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    17. Petri Böckerman & Alex Bryson & Antti Kauhanen & Mari Kangasniemi, 2016. "Does Job Support Make Workers Happy?," DoQSS Working Papers 16-16, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    18. Susan Gritzka & Peter Angerer & Reinhard Pietrowsky & Mathias Diebig, 2022. "The Impact of the Implementation of Preventive Measures Due to COVID-19 on Work Design and Early Childhood Professionals’ Well-Being—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-30, February.
    19. Vanroelen, Christophe & Levecque, Katia & Moors, Guy & Gadeyne, Sylvie & Louckx, Fred, 2009. "The structuring of occupational stressors in a Post-Fordist work environment. Moving beyond traditional accounts of demand, control and support," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1082-1090, March.
    20. Bubonya, Melisa & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Wooden, Mark, 2017. "Mental health and productivity at work: Does what you do matter?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:5:p:924-933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.