IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0102451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Keystone Species in the Human Gut Microbiome from Metagenomic Timeseries Using Sparse Linear Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Charles K Fisher
  • Pankaj Mehta

Abstract

Human associated microbial communities exert tremendous influence over human health and disease. With modern metagenomic sequencing methods it is now possible to follow the relative abundance of microbes in a community over time. These microbial communities exhibit rich ecological dynamics and an important goal of microbial ecology is to infer the ecological interactions between species directly from sequence data. Any algorithm for inferring ecological interactions must overcome three major obstacles: 1) a correlation between the abundances of two species does not imply that those species are interacting, 2) the sum constraint on the relative abundances obtained from metagenomic studies makes it difficult to infer the parameters in timeseries models, and 3) errors due to experimental uncertainty, or mis-assignment of sequencing reads into operational taxonomic units, bias inferences of species interactions due to a statistical problem called “errors-in-variables”. Here we introduce an approach, Learning Interactions from MIcrobial Time Series (LIMITS), that overcomes these obstacles. LIMITS uses sparse linear regression with boostrap aggregation to infer a discrete-time Lotka-Volterra model for microbial dynamics. We tested LIMITS on synthetic data and showed that it could reliably infer the topology of the inter-species ecological interactions. We then used LIMITS to characterize the species interactions in the gut microbiomes of two individuals and found that the interaction networks varied significantly between individuals. Furthermore, we found that the interaction networks of the two individuals are dominated by distinct “keystone species”, Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroided stercosis, that have a disproportionate influence on the structure of the gut microbiome even though they are only found in moderate abundance. Based on our results, we hypothesize that the abundances of certain keystone species may be responsible for individuality in the human gut microbiome.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles K Fisher & Pankaj Mehta, 2014. "Identifying Keystone Species in the Human Gut Microbiome from Metagenomic Timeseries Using Sparse Linear Regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0102451
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0102451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0102451&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0102451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Turnbaugh & Ruth E. Ley & Micah Hamady & Claire M. Fraser-Liggett & Rob Knight & Jeffrey I. Gordon, 2007. "The Human Microbiome Project," Nature, Nature, vol. 449(7164), pages 804-810, October.
    2. Peter Chesson & Jessica J. Kuang, 2008. "The interaction between predation and competition," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7219), pages 235-238, November.
    3. Tanya Yatsunenko & Federico E. Rey & Mark J. Manary & Indi Trehan & Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello & Monica Contreras & Magda Magris & Glida Hidalgo & Robert N. Baldassano & Andrey P. Anokhin & Andrew C, 2012. "Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7402), pages 222-227, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Jie & Shen, Xuzhu & Li, YaoTang, 2021. "Modeling the temporal dynamics of gut microbiota from a local community perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    2. Hannaford, Naomi E. & Heaps, Sarah E. & Nye, Tom M.W. & Curtis, Thomas P. & Allen, Ben & Golightly, Andrew & Wilkinson, Darren J., 2023. "A sparse Bayesian hierarchical vector autoregressive model for microbial dynamics in a wastewater treatment plant," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Abbas Kazerouni & Lawrence M Wein, 2017. "Exploring the Efficacy of Pooled Stools in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Microbiota-Associated Chronic Diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Xu, Libai & Kong, Dehan & Wang, Lidan & Gu, Hong & Kenney, Toby & Xu, Ximing, 2023. "Proportional stochastic generalized Lotka–Volterra model with an application to learning microbial community structures," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 448(C).
    5. Sean M Gibbons & Sean M Kearney & Chris S Smillie & Eric J Alm, 2017. "Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Xiaokan Guo & James Q Boedicker, 2016. "The Contribution of High-Order Metabolic Interactions to the Global Activity of a Four-Species Microbial Community," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Ren Dodge & Eric W. Jones & Haolong Zhu & Benjamin Obadia & Daniel J. Martinez & Chenhui Wang & Andrés Aranda-Díaz & Kevin Aumiller & Zhexian Liu & Marco Voltolini & Eoin L. Brodie & Kerwyn Casey Huan, 2023. "A symbiotic physical niche in Drosophila melanogaster regulates stable association of a multi-species gut microbiota," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Kenta Suzuki & Masato S. Abe & Daiki Kumakura & Shinji Nakaoka & Fuki Fujiwara & Hirokuni Miyamoto & Teruno Nakaguma & Mashiro Okada & Kengo Sakurai & Shohei Shimizu & Hiroyoshi Iwata & Hiroshi Masuya, 2022. "Chemical-Mediated Microbial Interactions Can Reduce the Effectiveness of Time-Series-Based Inference of Ecological Interaction Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Iris Chen & Yogeshwar D Kelkar & Yu Gu & Jie Zhou & Xing Qiu & Hulin Wu, 2017. "High-dimensional linear state space models for dynamic microbial interaction networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. James D Brunner & Nicholas Chia, 2020. "Minimizing the number of optimizations for efficient community dynamic flux balance analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Guy Amit & Amir Bashan, 2023. "Top-down identification of keystone taxa in the microbiome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Kumar P Mainali & Sharon Bewick & Peter Thielen & Thomas Mehoke & Florian P Breitwieser & Shishir Paudel & Arjun Adhikari & Joshua Wolfe & Eric V Slud & David Karig & William F Fagan, 2017. "Statistical analysis of co-occurrence patterns in microbial presence-absence datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles K Fisher & Thierry Mora & Aleksandra M Walczak, 2017. "Variable habitat conditions drive species covariation in the human microbiota," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Kumar P Mainali & Sharon Bewick & Peter Thielen & Thomas Mehoke & Florian P Breitwieser & Shishir Paudel & Arjun Adhikari & Joshua Wolfe & Eric V Slud & David Karig & William F Fagan, 2017. "Statistical analysis of co-occurrence patterns in microbial presence-absence datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Lena Takayasu & Wataru Suda & Eiichiro Watanabe & Shinji Fukuda & Kageyasu Takanashi & Hiroshi Ohno & Misako Takayasu & Hideki Takayasu & Masahira Hattori, 2017. "A 3-dimensional mathematical model of microbial proliferation that generates the characteristic cumulative relative abundance distributions in gut microbiomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Rajita Menon & Vivek Ramanan & Kirill S Korolev, 2018. "Interactions between species introduce spurious associations in microbiome studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Sean M Gibbons & Sean M Kearney & Chris S Smillie & Eric J Alm, 2017. "Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Ruairi C. Robertson & Thaddeus J. Edens & Lynnea Carr & Kuda Mutasa & Ethan K. Gough & Ceri Evans & Hyun Min Geum & Iman Baharmand & Sandeep K. Gill & Robert Ntozini & Laura E. Smith & Bernard Chasekw, 2023. "The gut microbiome and early-life growth in a population with high prevalence of stunting," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. John Molloy & Katrina Allen & Fiona Collier & Mimi L. K. Tang & Alister C. Ward & Peter Vuillermin, 2013. "The Potential Link between Gut Microbiota and IgE-Mediated Food Allergy in Early Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Shilan Li & Jianxin Shi & Paul Albert & Hong-Bin Fang, 2022. "Dependence Structure Analysis and Its Application in Human Microbiome," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Rousselière, Damien & Joly, Iragäel, 2011. "A propos de la capacité à survivre des coopératives : une étude de la relation entre âge et mortalité des organisations coopératives agricoles françaises," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 92(3).
    10. Yılmaz, Zeynep & Maden, Selahattin & Gökçe, Aytül, 2022. "Dynamics and stability of two predators–one prey mathematical model with fading memory in one predator," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 526-539.
    11. Daphna Rothschild & Erez Dekel & Jean Hausser & Anat Bren & Guy Aidelberg & Pablo Szekely & Uri Alon, 2014. "Linear Superposition and Prediction of Bacterial Promoter Activity Dynamics in Complex Conditions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-9, May.
    12. Antonella Gagliardi & Valentina Totino & Fatima Cacciotti & Valerio Iebba & Bruna Neroni & Giulia Bonfiglio & Maria Trancassini & Claudio Passariello & Fabrizio Pantanella & Serena Schippa, 2018. "Rebuilding the Gut Microbiota Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Allison G. White & George S. Watts & Zhenqiang Lu & Maria M. Meza-Montenegro & Eric A. Lutz & Philip Harber & Jefferey L. Burgess, 2014. "Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Microbiota in Induced Sputum," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Jae-Chang Cho, 2021. "Human microbiome privacy risks associated with summary statistics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Kabir, K.M. Ariful & Tanimoto, Jun, 2021. "The role of pairwise nonlinear evolutionary dynamics in the rock–paper–scissors game with noise," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    16. Sanzhima Garmaeva & Trishla Sinha & Anastasia Gulyaeva & Nataliia Kuzub & Johanne E. Spreckels & Sergio Andreu-Sánchez & Ranko Gacesa & Arnau Vich Vila & Siobhan Brushett & Marloes Kruk & Jackie Deken, 2024. "Transmission and dynamics of mother-infant gut viruses during pregnancy and early life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Pirjo Wacklin & Harri Mäkivuokko & Noora Alakulppi & Janne Nikkilä & Heli Tenkanen & Jarkko Räbinä & Jukka Partanen & Kari Aranko & Jaana Mättö, 2011. "Secretor Genotype (FUT2 gene) Is Strongly Associated with the Composition of Bifidobacteria in the Human Intestine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-10, May.
    18. Stump, Simon Maccracken & Chesson, Peter, 2015. "Distance-responsive predation is not necessary for the Janzen–Connell hypothesis," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 60-70.
    19. Yee Sang Wong & Nicholas John Osborne, 2022. "Biodiversity Effects on Human Mental Health via Microbiota Alterations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Weiyue Ji & Handuo Shi & Haoqian Zhang & Rui Sun & Jingyi Xi & Dingqiao Wen & Jingchen Feng & Yiwei Chen & Xiao Qin & Yanrong Ma & Wenhan Luo & Linna Deng & Hanchi Lin & Ruofan Yu & Qi Ouyang, 2013. "A Formalized Design Process for Bacterial Consortia That Perform Logic Computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0102451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.