IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0072218.html

Completeness of Maternal Smoking Status Recording during Pregnancy in United Kingdom Primary Care Data

Author

Listed:
  • Nafeesa N Dhalwani
  • Laila J Tata
  • Tim Coleman
  • Kate M Fleming
  • Lisa Szatkowski

Abstract

Background: Given the health impacts of smoking during pregnancy and the opportunity for primary healthcare teams to encourage pregnant smokers to quit, our primary aim was to assess the completeness of gestational smoking status recording in primary care data and investigate whether completeness varied with women's characteristics. As a secondary aim we assessed whether completeness of recording varied before and after the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Methods: In The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database we calculated the proportion of pregnancies ending in live births or stillbirths where there was a recording of maternal smoking status for each year from 2000 to 2009. Logistic regression was used to assess variation in the completeness of maternal smoking recording by maternal characteristics, before and after the introduction of QOF. Results: Women had a record of smoking status during the gestational period in 28% of the 277,552 pregnancies identified. In 2000, smoking status was recorded in 9% of pregnancies, rising to 43% in 2009. Pregnant women from the most deprived group were 17% more likely to have their smoking status recorded than pregnant women from the least deprived group before QOF implementation (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10–1.25) and 42% more likely afterwards (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.37–1.47). A diagnosis of asthma was related to recording of smoking status during pregnancy in both the pre-QOF (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.53–1.74) and post-QOF periods (OR 2.08, 95% CI 2.02–2.15). There was no association between having a diagnosis of diabetes and recording of smoking status during pregnancy pre-QOF however, post-QOF diagnosis of diabetes was associated with a 12% increase in recording of smoking status (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05–1.19). Conclusion: Recording of smoking status during pregnancy in primary care data is incomplete though has improved over time, especially after the implementation of the QOF, and varies by maternal characteristics and QOF-incentivised morbidities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nafeesa N Dhalwani & Laila J Tata & Tim Coleman & Kate M Fleming & Lisa Szatkowski, 2013. "Completeness of Maternal Smoking Status Recording during Pregnancy in United Kingdom Primary Care Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0072218
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072218
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0072218&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0072218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick L. Williams, 2000. "A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster-Correlated Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 645-646, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krause, Werner & Giebler, Heiko, 2020. "Shifting Welfare Policy Positions: The Impact of Radical Right Populist Party Success Beyond Migration Politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 331-348.
    2. Gerben ter Riet & Paula Chesley & Alan G Gross & Lara Siebeling & Patrick Muggensturm & Nadine Heller & Martin Umbehr & Daniela Vollenweider & Tsung Yu & Elie A Akl & Lizzy Brewster & Olaf M Dekkers &, 2013. "All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-6, November.
    3. Doidge, Craig & Andrew Karolyi, G. & Stulz, Rene M., 2007. "Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 1-39, October.
    4. Nicolas Jacquemet & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2014. "What drives failure to maximize payoffs in the lab? A test of the inequality aversion hypothesis," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(4), pages 243-264, December.
    5. Kuldeep Singh & Shailesh Rastogi, 2026. "Financial Distress, COVID-19 and Listed SMEs: A Multi-methodology Approach," Vision, , vol. 30(2), pages 185-199, April.
    6. Liebig, Stefan & Schupp, Jürgen, 2008. "Leistungs- oder Bedarfsgerechtigkeit? Über einen normativen Zielkonflikt des Wohlfahrtsstaats und seiner Bedeutung für die Bewertung des eigenen Erwerbseinkommens," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 7-30.
    7. Julia R. Henly & Susan J. Lambert, 2014. "Unpredictable Work Timing in Retail Jobs," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 67(3), pages 986-1016, July.
    8. Bharath, Sreedhar & Dahiya, Sandeep & Saunders, Anthony & Srinivasan, Anand, 2007. "So what do I get? The bank's view of lending relationships," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 368-419, August.
    9. Valentin Dimitrov & Prem C. Jain, 2026. "Yes, Virginia, there are superstar money managers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 867-886, February.
    10. Miss Nkunde Mwase, 2012. "How much should I hold? Reserve Adequacy in Emerging Markets and Small Islands," IMF Working Papers 2012/205, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Masa Trinajstic & Suzana Baresa & Sinisa Bogdan, 2018. "Regional Economic Growth And Tourism: A Panel Data Approach," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 9(2), pages 145-155.
    12. Robert J. Wellman & Marie-Pierre Sylvestre & Erin K. O’Loughlin & Hartley Dutczak & Annie Montreuil & Geetanjali D. Datta & Jennifer O’Loughlin, 2018. "Socioeconomic status is associated with the prevalence and co-occurrence of risk factors for cigarette smoking initiation during adolescence," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(1), pages 125-136, January.
    13. Konara, Palitha & Shirodkar, Vikrant, 2018. "Regulatory Institutional Distance and MNCs' Subsidiary Performance: Climbing up Vs. Climbing Down the Institutional Ladder," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 333-347.
    14. Wendt, Staci J. & Nakamoto, Jonathan & MacDougall, Pamela & Petrosino, Anthony, 2022. "Impacts of Healthy U: A cluster-randomized control trial of a sexual health education app developed for justice-involved male youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    15. Brian L. Egleston & Daniel O. Scharfstein & Ellen MacKenzie, 2009. "On Estimation of the Survivor Average Causal Effect in Observational Studies When Important Confounders Are Missing Due to Death," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 497-504, June.
    16. Lindsay Nettlefold & Patti-Jean Naylor & Heather M. Macdonald & Heather A. McKay, 2021. "Scaling up Action Schools! BC: How Does Voltage Drop at Scale Affect Student Level Outcomes? A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Ferreira, Susana & Akay, Alpaslan & Brereton, Finbarr & Cuñado, Juncal & Martinsson, Peter & Moro, Mirko & Ningal, Tine F., 2013. "Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    18. David Reeves & Fiona Holland & Hazel Morbey & Mark Hann & Faraz Ahmed & Linda Davies & John Keady & Iracema Leroi & Siobhan Reilly, 2023. "Retrospective study of more than 5 million emergency admissions to hospitals in England: Epidemiology and outcomes for people with dementia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Valeriya Dinger & Sven Steinkamp & Frank Westermann, 2014. "The Tragedy of the Commons and Inflation Bias in the Euro Area," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-91, February.
    20. Rabbiosi, Larissa & Santangelo, Grazia D., 2013. "Parent company benefits from reverse knowledge transfer: The role of the liability of newness in MNEs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 160-170.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0072218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.