IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004572.html

Taxation of foods high in fat, sugar, and sodium in India: A modelling study of health and economic impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Roche
  • Jingmin Zhu
  • Jack Olney
  • Daniel J Laydon
  • William Joe
  • Manika Sharma
  • Lindsay Steele
  • Franco Sassi

Abstract

Background: Consumption of foods high in fat, sugar, and sodium (HFSS) and obesity are rapidly increasing in India. Taxing HFSS foods has been proposed as one of the policy interventions to promote healthier diets globally. This study estimates the effect of this approach on nutrient intake, diet-related disease, and associated health and economic burdens in India. Methods and findings: We use a nationally representative expenditure survey of 261,746 households, dietary requirements, and food composition tables to model individual nutrient intake. Consumer responsiveness to food price changes for three income terciles, captured in price elasticities, is estimated using an Almost Ideal Demand System model. Longer-term policy impacts are estimated through a novel dynamic microsimulation model, Health-GPS. Modelled policy outcomes include changes in risk exposures, disease incidence and burden, and total health expenditure. On average, 9.9% of total energy intake comes from HFSS items, based on the definition by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India’s Labelling and Display Amendment Draft Regulations 2022. Applying the highest Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate of 40% on HFSS items is associated with a persistent average per capita decrease of 0.1705 kg/m2 (95% CI: −0.1709, −0.1700) in body mass index and 45.8 mg (95% CI: −45.9, −45.7) in daily sodium intake. Over 30 years, this could reduce annual disease incidence by up to 1.72% (95% CI: −1.78%, −1.66%) on average and prevent 0.63 million (95% CI: −0.71, −0.55) disability-adjusted life years per year from ischaemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, diabetes, and asthma, reducing total health expenditure by US$601 million (95% CI: −624, −578) per year. Larger absolute health gains accrue to higher-income individuals, reflecting higher baseline HFSS food intake. Given substitution patterns and a price-inelastic demand, the tax change is expected to generate a 92.0% (95% CI: 88.2%, 95.7%) increase in tax revenue from foods and beverages with only a minor effect on household spending (+1.0%, 95% CI: + 0.0%, + 1.9%). This analysis only captures the potential health impacts of changes in energy and sodium intakes. In addition, it does not model underlying temporal trends in disease incidence beyond those due to demographic changes, which would make our health impact estimates conservative if baseline disease risks were to increase in the future. Conclusions: Higher taxation of HFSS foods could help mitigate rising incidence of diet-related diseases and morbidity in India, reduce healthcare costs, and serve as an additional source of revenue for the government. Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?: In a modelling study, Maxime Roche, Jingmin Zhu and colleagues analyse what the effect would be of taxing food items high in fat, sugar and sodium in India, assessing both the effect on population health and the economic impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Roche & Jingmin Zhu & Jack Olney & Daniel J Laydon & William Joe & Manika Sharma & Lindsay Steele & Franco Sassi, 2026. "Taxation of foods high in fat, sugar, and sodium in India: A modelling study of health and economic impacts," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004572
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004572&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pineda, Elisa & Gressier, Mathilde & Li, Danying & Brown, Todd & Mounsey, Sarah & Olney, Jack & Sassi, Franco, 2024. "Review: Effectiveness and policy implications of health taxes on foods high in fat, salt, and sugar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Rachel Griffith & Martin O’Connell & Kate Smith, 2018. "Corrective Taxation and Internalities from Food Consumption," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 64(1), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher B. Barrett & Miguel I. Gόmez, 2025. "Fostering Healthy, Equitable, Resilient, and Sustainable Agri‐Food Value Chains," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 390-400, May.
    2. Tiboldo, G. & Castellari, E. & Moro, D., 2024. "The distributional implications of health taxes: A case study on the Italian sugar tax," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Stéphane Gauthier & Fanny Henriet, 2023. "Targeting Taxes on Local Externalities," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 151, pages 1-36.
    4. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Griffith, Rachel & O’Connell, Martin & Smith, Kate & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2020. "A new year, a new you? Within-individual variation in food purchases," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Roche, Maxime, 2025. "Can differentiated value-added tax rates promote healthier diets? The case of Costa Rica," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Marteau, Theresa M. & Mantzari, Eleni & Hollands, Gareth J., 2025. "Do nudges need a regulatory push? Comparing the effectiveness and implementation of exemplar nudge (size-based) and non-nudge (price-based) dietary interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    7. Chan, Nathan W. & Globus-Harris, Isla, 2023. "On consumer incentives for energy-efficient durables," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Peter Lloyd & Donald MacLaren, 2019. "Should We Tax Sugar and If So How?," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 52(1), pages 19-40, March.
    9. Zarko Kalamov & Marco Runkel, 2018. "Paternalistic Taxation of Unhealthy Food and the Intensive versus Extensive Margin of Obesity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6911, CESifo.
    10. SERSE Valerio,, 2019. "Do sugar taxes affect the right consumers ?," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2019017, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Loretta Moramarco & Naomi di Santo & Daniele Di Sparti & Alessandro Petrontino & Giuseppe Moro & Francesco Santoro & Vincenzo Fucilli, 2025. "Assessing Food Policies for Sustainability Transitions: A Scoping Review of Evaluation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-34, September.
    12. Daniel John Zizzo & Melanie Parravano & Ryota Nakamura & Suzanna Forwood & Marc Suhrcke, 2021. "The impact of taxation and signposting on diet: an online field study with breakfast cereals and soft drinks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(4), pages 1294-1324, December.
    13. Elodie Letort & Fanny Le Gloux & Pierre P. Dupraz, 2021. "Environmental and health labelling : and opportunity for the provision of agrienvironmental-climate public goods?," Post-Print hal-03338439, HAL.
    14. Panzone, Luca A., 2022. "Conditional promotion with a costly reward: an evaluation of a campaign to motivate consumption of fruit and vegetables," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322058, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Franziska Funke & Linus Mattauch & Inge van den Bijgaart & H. Charles J. Godfray & Cameron Hepburn & David Klenert & Marco Springmann & Nicolas Treich, 2022. "Toward Optimal Meat Pricing: Is It Time to Tax Meat Consumption?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(2), pages 219-240.
    16. Diana Kmeťková & Iva Zvěřinová & Milan Ščasný & Vojtěch Máca, 2025. "Acceptability of meat tax and subsidy removal by meat eaters: insights from five European countries," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Rachel Griffith & Victoria Jenneson & Joseph James & Anna Taylor, 2021. "The impact of a tax on added sugar and salt," IFS Working Papers W21/21, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Andrew Fearne & Natalia Borzino & Beatrix De La Iglesia & Peter Moffatt & Margaret Robbins, 2022. "Using supermarket loyalty card data to measure the differential impact of the UK soft drink sugar tax on buyer behaviour," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 321-337, June.
    19. Paul Calcott, 2022. "Regulating ingredients in sin goods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(3), pages 1120-1139, May.
    20. Rosella Levaggi & Carmen Marchiori & Paolo M. Panteghini, 2022. "Lifestyle taxes in the presence of profit shifting," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 81-96, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.