IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1011714.html

Environmental data provide marginal benefit for predicting climate adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Forrest Li
  • Daniel J Gates
  • Edward S Buckler
  • Matthew B Hufford
  • Garrett M Janzen
  • Rubén Rellán-Álvarez
  • Fausto Rodríguez-Zapata
  • J Alberto Romero Navarro
  • Ruairidh J H Sawers
  • Samantha J Snodgrass
  • Kai Sonder
  • Martha C Willcox
  • Sarah J Hearne
  • Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
  • Daniel E Runcie

Abstract

Climate change poses a major challenge for both natural and cultivated species. Genomic tools are increasingly used in both conservation and breeding to identify adaptive loci that can be used to guide management in future climates. Here, we study the utility of climate and genomic data for identifying promising alleles using common gardens of a large, geographically diverse sample of traditional maize varieties to evaluate multiple approaches. First, we used genotype data to predict environmental characteristics of germplasm collections to identify varieties that may be pre-adapted to target environments. Second, we used environmental GWAS (envGWAS) to identify loci associated with historical divergence along climatic gradients. Finally, we compared the value of environmental data and envGWAS-prioritized loci to genomic data for prioritizing traditional varieties. We find that maize yield traits are best predicted by genome-wide relatedness and population structure, and that incorporating envGWAS-identified variants or environment-of-origin provide little additional predictive information. While our results suggest that environmental data provide limited benefit in predicting fitness-related phenotypes, environmental GWAS is nonetheless a potentially powerful approach to identify individual novel loci associated with adaptation, especially when coupled with high density genotyping.Author summary: Populations of natural and cultivated plant and animal populations will be affected by more extreme climate events such as drought and flooding in the future. We explore whether characterization of the environment-of-origin of each accession in a large sample of traditional maize germplasm can be used to accelerate conservation and breeding efforts for adaptation. We compare the utility of genotype and environmental data for predicting fitness of individuals in a number of common garden trials. We find that environment-of-origin data and genome scans for loci that associate with abiotic environmental variables provide surprisingly little benefit to prioritizing accessions for improvement, despite clear evidence of environmental adaptation in these accessions. These results provide important practical insight into the use of gene banks for climate adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Forrest Li & Daniel J Gates & Edward S Buckler & Matthew B Hufford & Garrett M Janzen & Rubén Rellán-Álvarez & Fausto Rodríguez-Zapata & J Alberto Romero Navarro & Ruairidh J H Sawers & Samantha J Sno, 2025. "Environmental data provide marginal benefit for predicting climate adaptation," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011714
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011714&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. J. Challinor & J. Watson & D. B. Lobell & S. M. Howden & D. R. Smith & N. Chhetri, 2014. "A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 287-291, April.
    2. Corey Lesk & Pedram Rowhani & Navin Ramankutty, 2016. "Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7584), pages 84-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Alejandro del Pozo & Nidia Brunel-Saldias & Alejandra Engler & Samuel Ortega-Farias & Cesar Acevedo-Opazo & Gustavo A. Lobos & Roberto Jara-Rojas & Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, 2019. "Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies of Agriculture in Mediterranean-Climate Regions (MCRs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Rezwanul Parvez & Nazea Hasan Khan Chowdhury, 2020. "Weather and Crop Management Impact on Crop Yield Variability," Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(1), pages 7-15.
    4. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    5. Kamdi, Prasad Jairam & Swain, Dillip Kumar & Wani, Suhas P., 2023. "Developing climate change agro-adaptation strategies through field experiments and simulation analyses for sustainable sorghum production in semi-arid tropics of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    6. Junjun Cao & Guoyong Leng & Peng Yang & Qingbo Zhou & Wenbin Wu, 2022. "Variability in Crop Response to Spatiotemporal Variation in Climate in China, 1980–2014," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Francisco Costa & Fabien Forge & Jason Garred & João Paulo Pessoa, 2023. "The Impact of Climate Change on Risk and Return in Indian Agriculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Meier, Sebastián & Moore, Francisca & Morales, Arturo & Jobet, Claudio & López-Olivari, Rafael & Aponte, Humberto & Cartes, Paula & Campos, Pedro & Khan, Naser, 2021. "Interactive role between phosphorus utilization efficiency and water use efficiency. A tool to categorize wheats co-adapted to water and phosphorus limiting conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Vasilii Erokhin & Alexander Esaulko & Elena Pismennaya & Evgeny Golosnoy & Olga Vlasova & Anna Ivolga, 2021. "Combined Impact of Climate Change and Land Qualities on Winter Wheat Yield in Central Fore-Caucasus: The Long-Term Retrospective Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Gardner, A.S. & Maclean, I.M.D. & Gaston, K.J. & Bütikofer, L., 2021. "Forecasting future crop suitability with microclimate data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Mao, Hui & Sun, Zhenkai & Chai, Anyuan & Fang, Lan & Shi, Chaoqian, 2025. "Extreme Weather, agricultural insurance and farmer's climate adaptation technologies adoption in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Emilie Stokeld & Simon A. Croft & Jonathan M. H. Green & Christopher D. West, 2020. "Climate change, crops and commodity traders: subnational trade analysis highlights differentiated risk exposure," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 175-192, September.
    13. Wu, Fengqi & Guo, Simeng & Huang, Weibin & Zhang, Zhenggui & Han, Yingchun & Wang, Zhanbiao & Wang, Guoping & Feng, Lu & Li, Xiaofei & Lei, Yaping & Zhi, Xiaoyu & Yang, Beifang & Zhang, Shijie & Xiong, 2024. "Extreme rainfall and soil water consumption differences increase yield shedding at lower fruiting branches, reducing cotton water productivity under different sowing dates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    14. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    15. Cheng Miao & Jing Xie & Yingdong Li, 2024. "Evaluating the risk and its acceptability of crop yield reduction in Northwest China under the impact of wind hail disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(15), pages 14027-14048, December.
    16. Emelia Mphande & Bridget Bwalya Umar & Chibuye Florence Kunda-Wamuwi, 2022. "Gender and Legume Production in a Changing Climate Context: Experiences from Chipata, Eastern Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Guiomar Carranza-Gallego & Gloria I. Guzmán & Roberto Garcia-Ruíz & Manuel González de Molina & Eduardo Aguilera, 2019. "Addressing the Role of Landraces in the Sustainability of Mediterranean Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Meredith Niles & Margaret Brown & Robyn Dynes, 2016. "Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 277-295, March.
    19. Kedi Liu & Ranran Wang & Inge Schrijver & Rutger Hoekstra, 2024. "Can we project well-being? Towards integral well-being projections in climate models and beyond," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Li, Yibo & Tao, Fulu, 2022. "Interactions of genotype, environment and management on wheat traits and grain yield variations in different climate zones across China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.