IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of heterosis in the recent rapeseed (Brassica napus) polyploid by pairing parental nucleotide sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Wang
  • Tao Yan
  • Zhengbiao Long
  • Luna Yue Huang
  • Yang Zhu
  • Ying Xu
  • Xiaoyang Chen
  • Haksong Pak
  • Jiqiang Li
  • Dezhi Wu
  • Yang Xu
  • Shuijin Hua
  • Lixi Jiang

Abstract

The utilization of heterosis is a successful strategy in increasing yield for many crops. However, it consumes tremendous manpower to test the combining ability of the parents in fields. Here, we applied the genomic-selection (GS) strategy and developed models that significantly increase the predictability of heterosis by introducing the concept of a regional parental genetic-similarity index (PGSI) and reducing dimension in the calculation matrix in a machine-learning approach. Overall, PGSI negatively affected grain yield and several other traits but positively influenced the thousand-seed weight of the hybrids. It was found that the C subgenome of rapeseed had a greater impact on heterosis than the A subgenome. We drew maps with overviews of quantitative-trait loci that were responsible for the heterosis (h-QTLs) of various agronomic traits. Identifications and annotations of genes underlying high impacting h-QTLs were provided. Using models that we elaborated, combining abilities between an Ogu-CMS-pool member and a potential restorer can be simulated in silico, sidestepping laborious work, such as testing crosses in fields. The achievements here provide a case of heterosis prediction in polyploid genomes with relatively large genome sizes.Author summary: Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is of significant economic interest worldwide, providing high-quality oil with excellent health-promoting properties. It represents an excellent model of a successful recent polyploid that rapidly became an important crop worldwide. The utilization of hybridization, leading to hybrid vigor, or heterosis, is a successful strategy in increasing yield and vigor for many field crops including rapeseed (Brassica napus). However, the procedure of using classical breeding methods remains slow and laborious, illustrating the need for predictive and innovative methods. Here, we have achieved a significant breakthrough by using genome selection and significantly advanced models to predict the heterosis by pairing genome-wide nucleotides of parents. We provided maps with overviews of quantitative trait loci that were responsible for the heterosis of various agronomic traits. The research used deep resequencing (>30x) data of the entire polyploidy rapeseed genome, providing a successful case for the prediction of heterosis in polyploid genomes with relatively large genome sizes. Moreover, we provided the genetic information (SNPs) of 1007 core accessions of this species in the public domain for testing combinations with high heterosis using our predicting model for rapeseed breeders all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Wang & Tao Yan & Zhengbiao Long & Luna Yue Huang & Yang Zhu & Ying Xu & Xiaoyang Chen & Haksong Pak & Jiqiang Li & Dezhi Wu & Yang Xu & Shuijin Hua & Lixi Jiang, 2021. "Prediction of heterosis in the recent rapeseed (Brassica napus) polyploid by pairing parental nucleotide sequences," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009879
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Tibshirani, 2011. "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(3), pages 273-282, June.
    2. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    3. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Epprecht & Dominique Guegan & Álvaro Veiga & Joel Correa da Rosa, 2017. "Variable selection and forecasting via automated methods for linear models: LASSO/adaLASSO and Autometrics," Post-Print halshs-00917797, HAL.
    2. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Jian Lu & Raheel Ahmad & Thomas Nguyen & Jeffrey Cifello & Humza Hemani & Jiangyuan Li & Jinguo Chen & Siyi Li & Jing Wang & Achouak Achour & Joseph Chen & Meagan Colie & Ana Lustig & Christopher Dunn, 2022. "Heterogeneity and transcriptome changes of human CD8+ T cells across nine decades of life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Jin, Shaobo & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan, 2018. "Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: an orthogonal case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88118, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Shaobo Jin & Irini Moustaki & Fan Yang-Wallentin, 2018. "Approximated Penalized Maximum Likelihood for Exploratory Factor Analysis: An Orthogonal Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 628-649, September.
    6. Andreas Floren & Tobias Müller, 2023. "Using a Machine Learning Approach to Classify the Degree of Forest Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Hsu, David, 2015. "Identifying key variables and interactions in statistical models of building energy consumption using regularization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 144-155.
    8. Tanin Sirimongkolkasem & Reza Drikvandi, 2019. "On Regularisation Methods for Analysis of High Dimensional Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 737-763, December.
    9. Barbara Emmenegger & Julien Massoni & Christine M. Pestalozzi & Miriam Bortfeld-Miller & Benjamin A. Maier & Julia A. Vorholt, 2023. "Identifying microbiota community patterns important for plant protection using synthetic communities and machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018. "Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression," OSF Preprints cg8fq, Center for Open Science.
    11. Lauren P. Grant & Chris Gennings & Edmond P. Wickham & Derek Chapman & Shumei Sun & David C. Wheeler, 2018. "Modeling Pediatric Body Mass Index and Neighborhood Environment at Different Spatial Scales," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Tiffany Elsten & Mark Rooij, 2022. "SUBiNN: a stacked uni- and bivariate kNN sparse ensemble," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(4), pages 847-874, December.
    13. Felix Pretis & Lea Schneider & Jason E. Smerdon & David F. Hendry, 2016. "Detecting Volcanic Eruptions In Temperature Reconstructions By Designed Break-Indicator Saturation," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 403-429, July.
    14. Sagaert, Yves R. & Aghezzaf, El-Houssaine & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Desmet, Bram, 2018. "Tactical sales forecasting using a very large set of macroeconomic indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 558-569.
    15. Jacob Bergstedt & Sadoune Ait Kaci Azzou & Kristin Tsuo & Anthony Jaquaniello & Alejandra Urrutia & Maxime Rotival & David T. S. Lin & Julia L. MacIsaac & Michael S. Kobor & Matthew L. Albert & Darrag, 2022. "The immune factors driving DNA methylation variation in human blood," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Craig, Sarah J.C. & Kenney, Ana M. & Lin, Junli & Paul, Ian M. & Birch, Leann L. & Savage, Jennifer S. & Marini, Michele E. & Chiaromonte, Francesca & Reimherr, Matthew L. & Makova, Kateryna D., 2023. "Constructing a polygenic risk score for childhood obesity using functional data analysis," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 66-86.
    17. Colin Griesbach & Andreas Groll & Elisabeth Bergherr, 2021. "Addressing cluster-constant covariates in mixed effects models via likelihood-based boosting techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Joshua P White & Simon Dennis & Martin Tomko & Jessica Bell & Stephan Winter, 2021. "Paths to social licence for tracking-data analytics in university research and services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Ma, Shaohui & Fildes, Robert, 2017. "A retail store SKU promotions optimization model for category multi-period profit maximization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 680-692.
    20. Monica E. Ellwood-Lowe & Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli & Silvia A. Bunge, 2021. "Brain network coupling associated with cognitive performance varies as a function of a child’s environment in the ABCD study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.