IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009879.html

Prediction of heterosis in the recent rapeseed (Brassica napus) polyploid by pairing parental nucleotide sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Wang
  • Tao Yan
  • Zhengbiao Long
  • Luna Yue Huang
  • Yang Zhu
  • Ying Xu
  • Xiaoyang Chen
  • Haksong Pak
  • Jiqiang Li
  • Dezhi Wu
  • Yang Xu
  • Shuijin Hua
  • Lixi Jiang

Abstract

The utilization of heterosis is a successful strategy in increasing yield for many crops. However, it consumes tremendous manpower to test the combining ability of the parents in fields. Here, we applied the genomic-selection (GS) strategy and developed models that significantly increase the predictability of heterosis by introducing the concept of a regional parental genetic-similarity index (PGSI) and reducing dimension in the calculation matrix in a machine-learning approach. Overall, PGSI negatively affected grain yield and several other traits but positively influenced the thousand-seed weight of the hybrids. It was found that the C subgenome of rapeseed had a greater impact on heterosis than the A subgenome. We drew maps with overviews of quantitative-trait loci that were responsible for the heterosis (h-QTLs) of various agronomic traits. Identifications and annotations of genes underlying high impacting h-QTLs were provided. Using models that we elaborated, combining abilities between an Ogu-CMS-pool member and a potential restorer can be simulated in silico, sidestepping laborious work, such as testing crosses in fields. The achievements here provide a case of heterosis prediction in polyploid genomes with relatively large genome sizes.Author summary: Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is of significant economic interest worldwide, providing high-quality oil with excellent health-promoting properties. It represents an excellent model of a successful recent polyploid that rapidly became an important crop worldwide. The utilization of hybridization, leading to hybrid vigor, or heterosis, is a successful strategy in increasing yield and vigor for many field crops including rapeseed (Brassica napus). However, the procedure of using classical breeding methods remains slow and laborious, illustrating the need for predictive and innovative methods. Here, we have achieved a significant breakthrough by using genome selection and significantly advanced models to predict the heterosis by pairing genome-wide nucleotides of parents. We provided maps with overviews of quantitative trait loci that were responsible for the heterosis of various agronomic traits. The research used deep resequencing (>30x) data of the entire polyploidy rapeseed genome, providing a successful case for the prediction of heterosis in polyploid genomes with relatively large genome sizes. Moreover, we provided the genetic information (SNPs) of 1007 core accessions of this species in the public domain for testing combinations with high heterosis using our predicting model for rapeseed breeders all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Wang & Tao Yan & Zhengbiao Long & Luna Yue Huang & Yang Zhu & Ying Xu & Xiaoyang Chen & Haksong Pak & Jiqiang Li & Dezhi Wu & Yang Xu & Shuijin Hua & Lixi Jiang, 2021. "Prediction of heterosis in the recent rapeseed (Brassica napus) polyploid by pairing parental nucleotide sequences," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009879
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Tibshirani, 2011. "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(3), pages 273-282, June.
    2. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    3. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig, Sarah J.C. & Kenney, Ana M. & Lin, Junli & Paul, Ian M. & Birch, Leann L. & Savage, Jennifer S. & Marini, Michele E. & Chiaromonte, Francesca & Reimherr, Matthew L. & Makova, Kateryna D., 2023. "Constructing a polygenic risk score for childhood obesity using functional data analysis," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 66-86.
    2. Colin Griesbach & Andreas Groll & Elisabeth Bergherr, 2021. "Addressing cluster-constant covariates in mixed effects models via likelihood-based boosting techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Camila Epprecht & Dominique Guegan & Álvaro Veiga & Joel Correa da Rosa, 2017. "Variable selection and forecasting via automated methods for linear models: LASSO/adaLASSO and Autometrics," Post-Print halshs-00917797, HAL.
    4. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:cg8fq_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Jian Lu & Raheel Ahmad & Thomas Nguyen & Jeffrey Cifello & Humza Hemani & Jiangyuan Li & Jinguo Chen & Siyi Li & Jing Wang & Achouak Achour & Joseph Chen & Meagan Colie & Ana Lustig & Christopher Dunn, 2022. "Heterogeneity and transcriptome changes of human CD8+ T cells across nine decades of life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Jin, Shaobo & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan, 2018. "Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: an orthogonal case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88118, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Joshua P White & Simon Dennis & Martin Tomko & Jessica Bell & Stephan Winter, 2021. "Paths to social licence for tracking-data analytics in university research and services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Shaobo Jin & Irini Moustaki & Fan Yang-Wallentin, 2018. "Approximated Penalized Maximum Likelihood for Exploratory Factor Analysis: An Orthogonal Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 628-649, September.
    10. Ma, Shaohui & Fildes, Robert, 2017. "A retail store SKU promotions optimization model for category multi-period profit maximization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 680-692.
    11. Monica E. Ellwood-Lowe & Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli & Silvia A. Bunge, 2021. "Brain network coupling associated with cognitive performance varies as a function of a child’s environment in the ABCD study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Jack S. Gisby & Norzawani B. Buang & Artemis Papadaki & Candice L. Clarke & Talat H. Malik & Nicholas Medjeral-Thomas & Damiola Pinheiro & Paige M. Mortimer & Shanice Lewis & Eleanor Sandhu & Stephen , 2022. "Multi-omics identify falling LRRC15 as a COVID-19 severity marker and persistent pro-thrombotic signals in convalescence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Christos T Nakas & Narayan Schütz & Marcus Werners & Alexander B Leichtle, 2016. "Accuracy and Calibration of Computational Approaches for Inpatient Mortality Predictive Modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    14. Andreas Floren & Tobias Müller, 2023. "Using a Machine Learning Approach to Classify the Degree of Forest Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Jenny W Sun & Jessica M Franklin & Kathryn Rough & Rishi J Desai & Sonia Hernández-Díaz & Krista F Huybrechts & Brian T Bateman, 2020. "Predicting overdose among individuals prescribed opioids using routinely collected healthcare utilization data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Dominique Guegan & Peter Martey Addo & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01835164, HAL.
    17. Sepideh Fahimifar & Khadijeh Mousavi & Fatemeh Mozaffari & Marcel Ausloos, 2023. "Identification of the most important external features of highly cited scholarly papers through 3 (i.e., Ridge, Lasso, and Boruta) feature selection data mining methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3685-3712, August.
    18. Dominique Guegan & Peter Martey Addo & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Post-Print halshs-01835164, HAL.
    19. Heather E Wheeler & Kaanan P Shah & Jonathon Brenner & Tzintzuni Garcia & Keston Aquino-Michaels & GTEx Consortium & Nancy J Cox & Dan L Nicolae & Hae Kyung Im, 2016. "Survey of the Heritability and Sparse Architecture of Gene Expression Traits across Human Tissues," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Laura Freijeiro‐González & Manuel Febrero‐Bande & Wenceslao González‐Manteiga, 2022. "A Critical Review of LASSO and Its Derivatives for Variable Selection Under Dependence Among Covariates," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(1), pages 118-145, April.
    21. Alireza Daneshvar & Golalizadeh Mousa, 2023. "Regression shrinkage and selection via least quantile shrinkage and selection operator," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.