IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v22y1983i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Meaningful are Statements about the Desired Number of Additional Children? An Analysis of 1968 Pakistani Data

Author

Listed:
  • M. ALl KHAN

    (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore(Md., USA))

  • I. SIRAGELDIN

    (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore(Md., USA))

Abstract

In this paper we present a methodology for studying the desired number of additional children. Our methodology involves a generalization of our earlier work and an application of the estimator proposed by Heckman and the two-stage simultaneous Tobit estimator proposed by Nelson and Olson. Recent analyses of desired additional fertility have limited themselves to a dependent variable which is dichotomous, taking the value of one if the respondent wants additional children and of zero otherwise.l However, these studies ignore the information which is typically available. It is usual in most KAP surveys2 to follow up a respondent's response indicating his/her willingnessto have additional children by a further question as to their desired number. Any estimates based on reducing these responses to a single number are obviously inefficient. It is the object of this paper to provide estimates, based on 1968 Pakistani data, which are free from these difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • M. ALl KHAN & I. SIRAGELDIN, 1983. "How Meaningful are Statements about the Desired Number of Additional Children? An Analysis of 1968 Pakistani Data," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 22(1), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:22:y:1983:i:1:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1983/Volume1/1-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keeley, Michael C, 1975. "A Comment on "An Interpretation of the Economic Theory of Fertility."," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 461-468, June.
    2. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1973. "Regression Analysis when the Dependent Variable is Truncated Normal," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(6), pages 997-1016, November.
    3. Judith Blake, 1974. "Can we believe recent data on birth expectations in the United States?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(1), pages 25-44, February.
    4. Theodore W. Schultz, 1974. "Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number schu74-1.
    5. Mark Rosenzweig & Daniel Seiver, 1975. "Comment on N. K. Namboodiri’s “which couples at given parities expect to have additional births? an exercise in discriminant analysis”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 12(4), pages 665-668, November.
    6. M. Khan & Ismail Sirageldin, 1977. "Son preference and the demand for additional children in pakistan," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 14(4), pages 481-495, November.
    7. Lee, Lung-fei & Maddala, G S & Trost, R P, 1980. "Asymptotic Covariance Matrices of Two-Stage Probit and Two-Stage Tobit Methods for Simultaneous Equations Models with Selectivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(2), pages 491-503, March.
    8. Charles Westoff & Norman Ryder, 1977. "The Predictive Validity Of Reproductive Intentions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 14(4), pages 431-453, November.
    9. Leibenstein, Harvey, 1975. "On the Economic Theory of Fertility: A Reply to Keeley," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 469-472, June.
    10. repec:ucp:bknber:9780226740867 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Lolagene Coombs, 1974. "The measurement of family size preferences and subsequent fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(4), pages 587-611, November.
    12. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1979. "The Estimation of a Simultaneous-Equation Tobit Model," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 20(1), pages 169-181, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hina Nazli & Shahnaz Hamid, 1999. "Concerns of Food Security, Role of Gender, and Intrahousehold Dynamics in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 1999:175, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. ALl KHAN & ISMAIL SIRAGELDlN, 1981. "Intrafamily Interaction and Desired Additional Fertility in Pakistan.A Simultaneous-Equation Model with Dichotomous Dependent Variables," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 37-60.
    2. S. Morgan, 1982. "Parity-specific fertility intentions and uncertainty: the United States, 1970 to 1976," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(3), pages 315-334, August.
    3. Frank Heiland & Alexia Prskawetz & Warren C. Sanderson, 2008. "Are Individuals’ Desired Family Sizes Stable? Evidence from West German Panel Data," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 129-156, June.
    4. T. Paul Schultz, 1980. "An Economic Interpretation of the Decline in Fertiliiy in a Rapidly Developing Country: Consequences of Development and Family Planning," NBER Chapters, in: Population and Economic Change in Developing Countries, pages 209-288, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Hassan, Rashid M., 1996. "Planting strategies of maize farmers in Kenya: a simultaneous equations analysis in the presence of discrete dependent variables," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 137-149, November.
    6. Julie DaVanzo & Christine E. Peterson & Nathan R. Jones, 2003. "How Well Do Desired Fertility Measures for Wives and Husbands Predict Subsequent Fertility?," Working Papers 03-16, RAND Corporation.
    7. S. Morgan, 1981. "Intention and uncertainty at later stages of childbearing: the united states 1965 and 1970," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(3), pages 267-285, August.
    8. Richard Easterlin & Robert Pollak & Michael L. Wachter, 1980. "Toward a More General Economic Model of Fertility Determination: Endogenous Preferences and Natural Fertility," NBER Chapters, in: Population and Economic Change in Developing Countries, pages 81-150, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Máire Ní Bhrolcháin & Éva Beaujouan, 2011. "Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979-2007," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 99-129.
    10. Jin Seo Cho & Peter C. B. Phillips & Juwon Seo, 2022. "Parametric Conditional Mean Inference With Functional Data Applied To Lifetime Income Curves," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 391-456, February.
    11. Margaret Giles, 2003. "Correcting for selectivity bias in the estimation of road crash costs," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11), pages 1291-1301.
    12. Durr-e-Nayab, 1999. "Fertility Preferences and Behaviour: A Case Study of Two Villages in the Punjab, Pakistan," PIDE Research Report 1999:1, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    13. Lolagene Coombs & Ronald Freedman, 1979. "Some roots of preference: Roles, activities and familial values," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 16(3), pages 359-376, August.
    14. MacKenzie, John & Weaver, Thomas F., 1986. "A Household Production Analysis Of Fuelwood Demand In Rhode Island," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, April.
    15. Tomo Nishimura, 2012. "What are the factors of the gap between desired and actual fertility? - A comparative study of four developed countries," Discussion Paper Series 81, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Feb 2012.
    16. Auten, Gerald & Joulfaian, David, 2001. "Bequest taxes and capital gains realizations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 213-229, August.
    17. Bjørnsen, Hild-Marte & Biørn, Erik, 2006. "The Joint Labour Decisions Of Farm Couples: A Censored Response Analysis Of On-Farm And Off-Farm Work," Memorandum 05/2006, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    18. Koji Yasuda & Tomoko Kinugasa & Shigeyuki Hamori, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis Of Marital Status In Japan," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(03), pages 773-798, June.
    19. Silvia Meggiolaro, 2010. "The importance of intentions in the mechanism of reproductive behaviour formation," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(1), pages 107-125, March.
    20. Sofie Balcaen & Sophie Manigart & Hubert Ooghe, 2011. "From distress to exit: determinants of the time to exit," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 407-446, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:22:y:1983:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.