IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pdc/jrpieb/v8y2011i2p23-25.html

Approaches And Issues For Developing Livestock Services In Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • KULMAMAT MIRZAEV

    (Samarkand Institute of Economics and Service Uzbekistan)

Abstract

This article considers issues concerning improvement and development of livestock services in Uzbekistan. The author argues on efficiency of broader approach to development livestock services that assumes better coordination of involved different service-providers. Growing efficient institutional environment where different stakeholders participate and coordinate their operations and strategies plays important role in achieving the balanced growth of livestock sector. Based on review of different concepts the author draws economic policy recommendations to further develop the cattle industry in Uzbekistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Kulmamat Mirzaev, 2011. "Approaches And Issues For Developing Livestock Services In Uzbekistan," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 8(2), pages 23-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:pdc:jrpieb:v:8:y:2011:i:2:p:23-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://academicpublishingplatforms.com/downloads/pdfs/pieb/volume8/201106081613_04_PIEB_V8_UZ_Mirzaev_Livestock_Market.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://academicpublishingplatforms.com/article.php?journal=PIEB&number=8&article=481
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umali, D.L. & Feder, G. & de Haan, C., 1992. "The Balance between Public and Private Sector Activities in the Delivery of Livestock Services," World Bank - Discussion Papers 163, World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahuja, Vinod & Gustafson Daniel J & Joachim Otte, 2008. "Process, People, Power and Conflict: Some Lessons from a Participatory Policy Process in Andhra Pradesh, India," IIMA Working Papers WP2008-05-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    2. K.N, Nair & C.S, Krishnakumar, 2014. "Breeding, Feeding and Distribution of Milch Animal Holdings in India:An Analysis Based on the Data from the National Dairy Sample Survey," MPRA Paper 60731, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Townsend, Robert & Thirtle, Colin, 2001. "Is livestock research unproductive?: Separating health maintenance from improvement research," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(2-3), pages 177-189, September.
    4. Tambi, N. E. & Mukhebi, W. A. & Maina, W. O. & Solomon, H. -M., 1999. "Probit analysis of livestock producers' demand for private veterinary services in the high potential agricultural areas of Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 163-176, February.
    5. Narrod, Clare A., 2001. "Technology, Policies, And The Role Of The Private Sector In The Global Poultry Revolution," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14567, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    6. Mirzaev, Kulmamat, . "Approaches and issues for developing livestock services in Uzbekistan," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 8(2), pages 1-3.
    7. Izuddin Kartamulia & Artaria Misniwaty & Henk Knipscheer, 1995. "Development of a private animal health delivery network in North Sumatra, Indonesia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 12(2), pages 39-44, March.
    8. Narrod, Clare & Pray, Carl E. & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Technology transfer, policies, and the role of the private sector in the global poultry revolution," IFPRI discussion papers 841, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Riviere-Cinnamond, Ana, 2005. "Animal Health Policy and Practice: Scaling-up Community-based Animal Health Systems, Lessons from Human Health," PPLPI Working Papers 23775, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.
    10. Claire Heffernan, 2001. "Consumer preferences and the uptake of animal healthcare by the poor: a case study from Kenya," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(7), pages 847-861.
    11. Johnson, Robin & Hillman, Jimmye S. & Petrey, Allen, 2001. "Food Safety Issues, Protection And Trade (With Respect To Meat Products)," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14553, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    12. McMillan, Della E. & Meltzer, Martin I., 1996. "Vector-borne disease control in sub-Saharan Africa: A necessary but partial vision of development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 569-588, March.
    13. Gruère, Guillaume P. & Narrod, Clare A. & Abbott, Linda, 2011. "Agricultural, food, and water nanotechnologies for the poor: Opportunities, constraints, and role of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research," IFPRI discussion papers 1064, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Goletti, Francesco & Alfano, Anna, 1995. "Agricultural Input Market Reforms. A Review of Selected Literature," MSSD Discussion Papers 102545, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14006 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Constance McCorkle, 1995. "Back to the future: Lessons from ethnoveterinary RD&E for studying and applying local knowledge," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 12(2), pages 52-80, March.
    17. Parker, Andrew N. & Kirsten, Johann, 1995. "Decentralization: Toward A Revitalized Strategy For Rural Development," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 34(4), December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdc:jrpieb:v:8:y:2011:i:2:p:23-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jaroslav Holecek The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jaroslav Holecek to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pradecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.