IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04888-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding college students’ acceptance of machine translation in foreign language learning: an integrated model of UTAUT and task-technology fit

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Sha

    (China University of Mining and Technology
    Center for Translation and Cross-cultural Studies of China University of Mining and Technology)

  • Xiaoyue Wang

    (China University of Mining and Technology)

  • Tingting Liu

    (China University of Mining and Technology)

Abstract

Machine translation (MT) has emerged as a widely-used foreign language learning tool that could enhance language learning proficiency and productivity. However, the factors influencing college students’ acceptance of MT in foreign language learning remain insufficiently understood. Additionally, the existing literature seems to fail to examine the fitness between MT and foreign language learning tasks. Thus, this study integrates the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Usage of Technology (UTAUT) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) models to investigate students’ acceptance of MT in foreign language learning. This study adopted a survey-based quantitative research approach, employing a convenience sampling method to collect 313 valid responses. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine the hypothesized relationships. Results showed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence significantly influenced behavioral intention, and the behavioral intention to use MT had an impact on actual use behavior among students. Moreover, experience has proved to be a moderator that has positively impacted the relationship between performance expectancy and the intention use of MT, and TTF moderated the relationship between performance expectancy and behavioral intention, as well as the relationship between effort expectancy and behavioral intention. The theoretical and practical implications are provided for future researchers and practitioners to enhance students’ effective use of MT in their foreign language learning activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Sha & Xiaoyue Wang & Tingting Liu, 2025. "Understanding college students’ acceptance of machine translation in foreign language learning: an integrated model of UTAUT and task-technology fit," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04888-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04888-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04888-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04888-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Cui & Xiao Liu & Yuqin Cheng, 2023. "A Comparative Study on the Effort of Human Translation and Post-Editing in Relation to Text Types: An Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging Experiment," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    2. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    3. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    4. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    5. Yanxia Yang & Runze Liu & Xingmin Qian & Jiayue Ni, 2023. "Performance and perception: machine translation post-editing in Chinese-English news translation by novice translators," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cliff R. Kikawa & Charity Kiconco & Moses Agaba & Dimas Ntirampeba & Amos Ssematimba & Billy M. Kalema, 2022. "Social Media Marketing for Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in Uganda: A Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang, 2018. "Exploring the impacts of perceived e-collaboration service convenience on new product development in Taiwanese IC design companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 107-120, June.
    3. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    4. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Gao, Changyuan & Zhai, LiLi & Shahzad, Fakhar & Khan, Imran, 2021. "Environmental air pollution management system: Predicting user adoption behavior of big data analytics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Chidera C. Ugwuanyi & Chukwunonso Oraedu & Chuka U. Ifediora & Ernest E. Izogo & Simplice A. Asongu & Ikechukwu J. Attamah, 2022. "Understanding drivers of self-service technologies (SSTs) satisfaction and marketing bottom lines: Evidence from Nigeria," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 22/025, African Governance and Development Institute..
    6. Kapser, Sebastian & Abdelrahman, Mahmoud & Bernecker, Tobias, 2021. "Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19 – How do men and women differ in their acceptance?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 183-198.
    7. David Edwards & Nachiappan Subramanian & Atanu Chaudhuri & Piera Morlacchi & Wen Zeng, 2024. "Use of delivery drones for humanitarian operations: analysis of adoption barriers among logistics service providers from the technology acceptance model perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1645-1667, April.
    8. Hailiang Wang & Jiaxin Zhang & Yan Luximon & Mingfu Qin & Ping Geng & Da Tao, 2022. "The Determinants of User Acceptance of Mobile Medical Platforms: An Investigation Integrating the TPB, TAM, and Patient-Centered Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Tianyi Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2024. "Development Trajectory of Blockchain Platforms: The Role of Multirole," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1296-1323, September.
    10. Peter Saba & Régis Meissonier & Antoine Harfouche, 2025. "Different IT Projects, but the same Conflicts. Action Research During IT Deployment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 683-709, April.
    11. Sang Soo Kim, 2020. "Purchase Intention in the Online Open Market: Do Concerns for E-Commerce Really Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Qin, Zhanbo & Xu, Qinxue & Zhang, Changping & Zuo, Lanlan & Chen, Lingling & Fang, Rongjie, 2024. "Social network shapes farmers’ non-point source pollution governance behavior – A case study in the Lijiang River Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    13. Chiara Panari & Giorgio Lorenzi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "The Predictive Factors of New Technology Adoption, Workers’ Well-Being and Absenteeism: The Case of a Public Maritime Company in Venice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Sujeet Kumar Sharma & Anubhav Mishra, 2023. "Enablers and Inhibitors of Mobile Payments in Rural India: a Dual-Factor Theory Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2335-2351, December.
    15. Tianyang Huang & Gang Wang & Chiwu Huang, 2024. "What promotes the mobile payment behavior of the elderly?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Uzir, Md Uzir Hossain & Al Halbusi, Hussam & Lim, Rodney & Jerin, Ishraq & Abdul Hamid, Abu Bakar & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Haque, Ahasanul, 2021. "Applied Artificial Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in Bangladesh during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Klayson Sesana Bonatto & Fábio Yoshio Suguri Motoki & João Eudes Bezerra Filho & Emerson Wagner Mainardes, 2022. "Social Accountability: E-Monitoring Public Management in an Emerging Economy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 155-172, March.
    18. G. M. Azmal Ali Quaosar & Md. Abidur Rahman & Md. Siddikur Rahman, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of HRIS: An Empirical Study Using Extended UTAUT2 Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(3), pages 213-213, June.
    19. Shehawy, Yasser Moustafa & Faisal Ali Khan, Syed Md & Ali M Khalufi, Nasser & Abdullah, Riyaz Sheikh, 2025. "Customer adoption of robot: Synergizing customer acceptance of robot-assisted retail technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Bommer, William H. & Milevoj, Emil & Rana, Shailesh, 2023. "The intention to use cryptocurrency: A meta-analysis of what we know," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04888-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.