IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04814-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focal points and blind spots of human-centered AI: AI risks in written online media

Author

Listed:
  • Marcell Sebestyén

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)

Abstract

There is a strong tendency in prevailing discussions about artificial intelligence (AI) to focus predominantly on human-centered concerns, thereby neglecting the broader impacts of this technology. This paper presents a categorization of AI risks highlighted in public discourse, as reflected in written online media accounts, to provide a background for its primary focus: exploring the dimensions of AI threats that receive insufficient attention. Particular emphasis is dedicated to the ignored issues of animal welfare and the psychological impacts on humans, the latter of which surprisingly remains inadequately addressed despite the prevalent anthropocentric perspective of the public conversation. Moreover, this work also considers other underexplored dangers of AI development for the environment and, hypothetically, for sentient AI. The methodology of this study is grounded in a manual selection and meticulous, thematic, and discourse analytical manual examination of online articles published in the aftermath of the AI surge following ChatGPT’s launch in late 2022. This qualitative approach is specifically designed to overcome the limitations of automated, surface-level evaluations typically used in media reviews, aiming to provide insights and nuances often missed by the mechanistic and algorithm-driven methods prevalent in contemporary research. Through this detail-oriented investigation, a categorization of the dominant themes in the discourse on AI hazards was developed to identify its overlooked aspects. Stemming from this evaluation, the paper argues for expanding risk assessment frameworks in public thinking to a morally more inclusive approach. It calls for a more comprehensive acknowledgment of the potential harm of AI technology’s progress to non-human animals, the environment, and, more theoretically, artificial agents possibly attaining sentience. Furthermore, it calls for a more balanced allocation of focus among prospective menaces for humans, prioritizing psychological consequences, thereby offering a more sophisticated and capable strategy for tackling the diverse spectrum of perils presented by AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcell Sebestyén, 2025. "Focal points and blind spots of human-centered AI: AI risks in written online media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04814-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04814-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04814-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04814-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grimmer, Justin & Stewart, Brandon M., 2013. "Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 267-297, July.
    2. Ashlee Humphreys & Rebecca Jen-Hui Wang & Eileen FischerEditor & Linda PriceAssociate Editor, 2018. "Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1274-1306.
    3. Anne-Laure Ligozat & Julien Lefevre & Aurélie Bugeau & Jacques Combaz, 2022. "Unraveling the Hidden Environmental Impacts of AI Solutions for Environment Life Cycle Assessment of AI Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Nguyen, Dennis, 2023. "How news media frame data risks in their coverage of big data and AI," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30.
    5. Mike S. Schäfer & James Painter, 2021. "Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    6. Bossert, Leonie & Hagendorff, Thilo, 2021. "Animals and AI. The role of animals in AI research and application – An overview and ethical evaluation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Kai Jia & Nan Zhang, 2022. "Categorization and eccentricity of AI risks: a comparative study of the global AI guidelines," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 59-71, March.
    8. Leonie N. Bossert & Thilo Hagendorff, 2023. "The ethics of sustainable AI: Why animals (should) matter for a sustainable use of AI," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3459-3467, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federico Mangiò & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Daniela Andreini & Lia Zarantonello, 2024. "How persuasive is woke brand communication on social media? Evidence from a consumer engagement analysis on Facebook," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(4), pages 345-381, July.
    2. Kim, Phillip H. & Kotha, Reddi & Fourné, Sebastian P.L. & Coussement, Kristof, 2019. "Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1429-1444.
    3. Bernhardt, Lea & Dewenter, Ralf & Thomas, Tobias, 2023. "Measuring partisan media bias in US newscasts from 2001 to 2012," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Tironi, Martín & Rivera Lisboa, Diego Ignacio, 2023. "Artificial intelligence in the new forms of environmental governance in the Chilean State: Towards an eco-algorithmic governance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    6. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    7. Rauh, Christian, 2015. "Communicating supranational governance? The salience of EU affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 116-138.
    8. Julia Seiermann, 2018. "Only Words? How Power in Trade Agreement Texts Affects International Trade Flows," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 80, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    9. Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2021. "Issue attention on international courts: Evidence from the European Court of Justice," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 793-815, October.
    10. Dewenter, Ralf & Dulleck, Uwe & Thomas, Tobias, 2018. "The political coverage index and its application to government capture," Research Papers 6, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Pastwa, Anna M. & Shrestha, Prabal & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: a topic modeling approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021018, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    12. Maksym Polyakov & Morteza Chalak & Md. Sayed Iftekhar & Ram Pandit & Sorada Tapsuwan & Fan Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2018. "Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 217-239, September.
    13. Kübler, Raoul V. & Manke, Kai & Pauwels, Koen, 2025. "I like, I share, I vote: Mapping the dynamic system of political marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Milena Djourelova & Ruben Durante, 2019. "Media attention and strategic timing in politics: Evidence from U.S. presidential executive orders," Economics Working Papers 1675, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    15. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    16. Erkan Işığıçok & Sadullah Çelik & Dilek Özdemir Yılmaz, 2023. "Analysis of Skills and Qualifications Required in Data Scientist Job Postings Based on the Pareto Analysis Perspective Using Text Mining," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(39), pages 10-25, December.
    17. Yuting Chen & Don Bredin & Valerio Potì & Roman Matkovskyy, 2022. "COVID risk narratives: a computational linguistic approach to the econometric identification of narrative risk during a pandemic," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 17-61, March.
    18. Purwoko Haryadi Santoso & Edi Istiyono & Haryanto & Wahyu Hidayatulloh, 2022. "Thematic Analysis of Indonesian Physics Education Research Literature Using Machine Learning," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-41, October.
    19. Markus Eberhardt & Giovanni Facchini & Valeria Rueda, 2023. "Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(655), pages 2676-2708.
    20. Rauh, Christian, 2018. "Validating a sentiment dictionary for German political language—a workbench note," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 319-343.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04814-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.