IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04812-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From chemotherapy to biotechnology: the transformation of the cancer research pipeline at Hoffmann-La Roche

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Timmermann

    (The University of Manchester)

Abstract

This paper analyses the history of the research and development pipeline for anticancer drugs at the pharmaceutical company Hoffmann-La Roche from the 1950s to the early 2000s. I argue that the history of Roche’s oncology drugs exemplifies a major transformation in the pharmaceutical industry, from a chemistry-driven innovation model, relying predominantly on research in company-owned laboratories, developing chemotherapies for infectious diseases, towards one that is organised around molecular biology and collaborations with biotech companies and that appears to be targeting primarily cancer, employing relatively expensive biological compounds. While the shift to molecular biology and collaborations with biotech companies has received considerable attention from scholars of innovation, the majority of this literature deals with the early stages of this development. My case studies allow me to look at the impact of research on oncogenes and monoclonal antibody technology, which has been less extensively studied. I will look to programmatic publications by Roche’s Head of Research in the late 1980s and 1990s, Jürgen Drews, to contextualise this transformation. The case studies the paper discusses in detail are the histories of the anticancer drugs 5-Fluoro-Uracil (5-FU), classed as an antimetabolite and approved by the FDA in 1962, procarbazine (marketed as Natulan), another traditional chemotherapy drug that received FDA approval in 1969, and the monoclonal antibody compounds rituxan (marketed as Rituxan or Mabthera and approved by the FDA in 1997), trastuzumab (Herceptin, FDA approval in 1998), and bevacizumab (Avastin, approved by the FDA in 2004). While the developments mapped in this paper appear to illustrate a divergence of approaches in the development of antimicrobial and cancer drugs, they can also be read as a shift towards a new interpretation of an old paradigm: monoclonal antibodies as the ultimate magic bullets, that can also be employed to treat other conditions, including those caused by microbes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Timmermann, 2025. "From chemotherapy to biotechnology: the transformation of the cancer research pipeline at Hoffmann-La Roche," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04812-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04812-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04812-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04812-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galambos, Louis & Sturchio, Jeffrey L., 1998. "Pharmaceutical Firms and the Transition to Biotechnology: A Study in Strategic Innovation," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(2), pages 250-278, July.
    2. Mazzucato,Mariana & Dosi,Giovanni (ed.), 2006. "Knowledge Accumulation and Industry Evolution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521858229, June.
    3. Colgrove, J., 2002. "The McKeown thesis: A historical controversy and its enduring influence," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(5), pages 725-729.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lazonick, William & Tulum, Öner, 2011. "US biopharmaceutical finance and the sustainability of the biotech business model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1170-1187.
    2. Hopkins, Michael M. & Martin, Paul A. & Nightingale, Paul & Kraft, Alison & Mahdi, Surya, 2007. "The myth of the biotech revolution: An assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 566-589, May.
    3. Jon Anson, 2010. "Beyond Material Explanations: Family Solidarity and Mortality, a Small Area‐level Analysis," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 27-45, March.
    4. James Foreman-Peck & Peng Zhou, 2021. "Fertility versus productivity: a model of growth with evolutionary equilibria," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 34(3), pages 1073-1104, July.
    5. Timothy J. Hatton, 2014. "How have Europeans grown so tall?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 349-372.
    6. Ryan, Michael P., 2010. "Patent Incentives, Technology Markets, and Public-Private Bio-Medical Innovation Networks in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1082-1093, August.
    7. Jean-François Hennart, 2020. "More than intent: A bundling model of MNE–SME interactions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(7), pages 1176-1194, September.
    8. Stephan, Michael, 2013. "Theorien der Industrieevolution," Discussion Papers on Strategy and Innovation 13-03, Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Technology and Innovation Management (TIM).
    9. Jesse McDevitt-Irwin & James R. Irwin, 2025. "Infant mortality among US whites in the 19th century: New evidence from childhood sex ratios," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 52(10), pages 303-350.
    10. Maureen McKelvey & Bastian Rake, 2012. "Research Network Position and Innovative Performance: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-021, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    11. Gambardella, Alfonso & Orsenigo, Luigi & Pammolli, Fabio, 2000. "Global Competitiveness in Pharmaceuticals: A European Perspective," MPRA Paper 15965, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Versaevel, Bruno, 2019. "One lab, two firms, many possibilities: On R&D outsourcing in the biopharmaceutical industry," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 260-283.
    13. Bruce Rasmussen, 2010. "Innovation and Commercialisation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13680, March.
    14. Bastian Rake, 2017. "Determinants of pharmaceutical innovation: the role of technological opportunities revisited," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 691-727, September.
    15. Höglinger, Christoph & Sinozic, Tanja & Tödtling, Franz, 2012. "Emergence, growth and transformation in local clusters - Environmental industries in the region of Upper Austria," SRE-Discussion Papers 2012/07, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. Fiedler, Marina & Welpe, Isabell M., 2010. "Antecedents of cooperative commercialisation strategies of nanotechnology firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 400-410, April.
    17. Martin Backfisch, 2018. "The Development of Firm Size and Innovativeness in the Pharmaceutical industry between 1989 and 2010," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201813, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    18. Frank T. Rothaermel & Andrew M. Hess, 2007. "Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 898-921, December.
    19. Rothaermel, Frank T. & Thursby, Marie, 2007. "The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 832-849, July.
    20. Roijakkers, Nadine & Hagedoorn, John & van Kranenburg, Hans, 2005. "Dual market structures and the likelihood of repeated ties - evidence from pharmaceutical biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 235-245, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04812-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.