IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v20y2018i2d10.1057_s41278-016-0044-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Containership port time: The bay time factor

Author

Listed:
  • Shmuel Yahalom

    (State University of New York Maritime College)

  • Changqian Guan

    (United States Merchant Marine Academy)

Abstract

Containership size has been increasing in length, width (beam), and height. The introduction of Ultra Large Containerships results in a much larger number of containers stowed in a cargo bay. The objective of this paper is to determine the impact of the increasing containership bay size on the economies of scale at berth. We develop the concept of bay time, the amount of time it takes to load and discharge the largest cargo bay of a containership based on bay size, in order to determine the minimum amount of time it takes to discharge and load a containership. The analysis establishes that bay time is the foundation and critical path of the minimum amount of time a containership must stay at berth and in port. The study notes that, inherently, an increase in containership bay size involves diseconomies of scale in cargo handling operations, at a given level of gantry crane productivity. We find that there are increasing diseconomies of scale for large containerships at berth. The study also establishes that: as beam/bay size increases, the average cargo handling time of two bays increases by an average of 4.5 h at any productivity level. Bay time declines as crane productivity increases up to the crane’s technological constraint. Furthermore, the larger the beam/bay, the larger the marginal benefits when productivity increases. The diseconomies of scale are stable and predictable at every gantry crane productivity level. The study recommends using bay time as the fundamental measure for containership performance at berth and in port, as well as for voyage planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Shmuel Yahalom & Changqian Guan, 2018. "Containership port time: The bay time factor," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(2), pages 211-227, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1057_s41278-016-0044-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-016-0044-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-016-0044-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-016-0044-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh & Olaf Merk, 2014. "Time Efficiency at World Container Ports," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2014/8, OECD Publishing.
    2. Christa Sys & Gust Blauwens & Eddy Omey & Eddy Van De Voorde & Frank Witlox, 2008. "In Search of the Link between Ship Size and Operations," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 435-463, June.
    3. R. G. McLellan, 1997. "Bigger vessels: How big is too big?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 193-211, January.
    4. Itf, 2015. "The Impact of Mega-Ships," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 10, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Zhu, Shengda & Fu, Xiaowen & Bell, Michael G.H., 2021. "Container shipping line port choice patterns in East Asia the effects of port affiliation and spatial dependence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milan Janić, 2018. "Multidimensional examination of the performances of a liner shipping network: trunk line/route operated by conventional (Panamax Max) and mega (ULC - ultra large container) ships," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Enrico Musso & Anna Sciomachen, 2020. "Impact of megaships on the performance of port container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 432-445, September.
    3. Enrico Musso & Anna Sciomachen, 0. "Impact of megaships on the performance of port container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    4. Carlo Altomonte & Laura Bonacorsi & Italo Colantobe, 2018. "Trade and Growth in the Age of Global Value Chains," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1897, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    5. Katrien Storms & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander & Ruben Deuren, 2023. "Demurrage and detention: from operational challenges towards solutions," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, December.
    6. Jiawei Ge & Mo Zhu & Mei Sha & Theo Notteboom & Wenming Shi & Xuefeng Wang, 2021. "Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 587-614, December.
    7. Athanasios A. Pallis & Aimilia A. Papachristou & Charalampos Platias, 2017. "Environmental policies and practices in Cruise Ports: Waste reception facilities in the Med," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(1), pages 54-70, January-M.
    8. Tran, Nguyen Khoi & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2015. "An empirical study of fleet expansion and growth of ship size in container liner shipping," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 241-253.
    9. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    10. Courage Mlambo, 2021. "The Impact of Port Performance on Trade: The Case of Selected African States," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, September.
    11. H. B. Bendall & A. F. Stent, 1999. "Longhaul feeder services in an era of changing technology: an Asia-Pacific perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 145-159, April.
    12. Lucija Bukvić & Jasmina Pašagić Škrinjar & Borna Abramović & Vladislav Zitrický, 2021. "Route Selection Decision-Making in an Intermodal Transport Network Using Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Productivity Commission, 2005. "Review of Part X of the Trade Practices Act 1974: International Liner Cargo Shipping," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 32.
    14. Francesco Parola & Marcello Risitano & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 2017. "The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 116-138, January.
    15. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh, 2022. "The spatial determinants of innovation diffusion: evidence from global shipping networks," EconomiX Working Papers 2022-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    16. Ronald A. Halim & Lucie Kirstein & Olaf Merk & Luis M. Martinez, 2018. "Decarbonization Pathways for International Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2017. "The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-173.
    18. Olaf M. Merk, 2020. "Quantifying tax subsidies to shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 517-535, December.
    19. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Bell, Michael G.H., 2013. "Liner ship route capacity utilization estimation with a bounded polyhedral container shipment demand pattern," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 57-76.
    20. Khandaker Rasel Hasan & Wei Zhang & Wenming Shi, 2023. "A Sustainable Port-Hinterland Container Transport System: The Simulation-Based Scenarios for CO 2 Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1057_s41278-016-0044-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.