IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spd/journl/v67y2016i1p54-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental policies and practices in Cruise Ports: Waste reception facilities in the Med

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasios A. Pallis

    (University of the Aegean, Research in Shipping and Ports (RESHIP) Laboratory)

  • Aimilia A. Papachristou

    (University of the Aegean, Research in Shipping and Ports (RESHIP) Laboratory)

  • Charalampos Platias

    (Ministry of Maritime Affairs & Insular Policy)

Abstract

With cruise activities continuing to grow, the cruise world and related decision makers take initiatives aiming to handle the produced externalities. Among the key environmental issues is the handling of the various wastes produced on cruise ships. In recent times, cruise lines and ports have put efforts into reducing, selecting and managing generated wastes implementing the requirements of the international regulatory framework (MARPOL 73/78), as well as those imposed by the European legislation. This study focuses on the state port reception facilities (PRF) in the case of the second biggest cruise region of the world, the Mediterranean and its adjoining seas. In particular, it sheds light on the extent that the current practices of cruise ports have achieved a satisfactory level of compliance to the emerging environmental related international regulatory framework. The paper does so via a survey that maps the existing conditions and port based practices followed by 40 port entities that manage 52 cruise ports in the region. The findings record the available facilities, technologies and services suggesting a widespread effective correspondence to required adjustment. It also details a variation as regards the charging practices, that might affect the level playing field. The analysis generates knowledge on the emphasis given by cruise ports in addressing environment challenges. Given that the European Directive governing PRF is currently (2016) under review, the study provides practical recommendations to decision makers and practitioners on what can be done so as to further secure a sustainable cruise future.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasios A. Pallis & Aimilia A. Papachristou & Charalampos Platias, 2017. "Environmental policies and practices in Cruise Ports: Waste reception facilities in the Med," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(1), pages 54-70, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:spd:journl:v:67:y:2016:i:1:p:54-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spoudai.unipi.gr/index.php/spoudai/article/download/2572/2630/2572-3081-1-SM
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theo E. Notteboom & Athanasios A. Pallis & Peter W. De Langen & Aimilia Papachristou, 2013. "Advances in port studies: the contribution of 40 years Maritime Policy & Management," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(7), pages 636-653, December.
    2. Constantinos I. Chlomoudis & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2002. "European Union Port Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2821.
    3. Thanos Pallis, 2015. "Cruise Shipping and Urban Development: State of the Art of the Industry and Cruise Ports," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2015/14, OECD Publishing.
    4. Athanasios Pallis & Thomas Vitsounis & Peter De Langen & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "Port Economics, Policy and Management: Content Classification and Survey," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 445-471.
    5. Itf, 2015. "The Impact of Mega-Ships," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 10, OECD Publishing.
    6. Butt, Nickie, 2007. "The impact of cruise ship generated waste on home ports and ports of call: A study of Southampton," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 591-598, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    2. Merica Slišković & Helena Ukić Boljat & Igor Jelaska & Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, 2018. "Review of Generated Waste from Cruisers: Dubrovnik, Split, and Zadar Port Case Studies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athanasios A. Pallis & Francesco Parola & Giovanni Satta & Theo E. Notteboom, 2018. "Private entry in cruise terminal operations in the Mediterranean Sea," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Sdoukopoulos, Eleftherios & Boile, Maria, 2020. "Port-hinterland concept evolution: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Joanna Kizielewicz, 2020. "Measuring the Economic and Social Contribution of Cruise Tourism Development to Coastal Tourist Destinations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 147-171.
    4. Yui-yip Lau & César Ducruet & Adolf K. Y. Ng & Xiaowen Fu, 2017. "Across the waves: a bibliometric analysis of container shipping research since the 1960s," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 667-684, August.
    5. Ducruet, César & Panahi, Roozbeh & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin & Afenyo, Mawuli, 2019. "Between geography and transport: A scientometric analysis of port studies in Journal of Transport Geography," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng & Li, Kevin & Yang, Jinglei, 2016. "Port connectivity in a logistic network: The case of Bohai Bay, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 341-354.
    7. Athanasios A. Pallis & Francesco Parola & Michele Acciaro, 2017. "Empirical methods in the study of maritime economics," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 189-195, June.
    8. Jagan Jeevan & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Alessandro Hill & Jürgen W. Böse, 0. "A decision support system for improved resource planning and truck routing at logistic nodes," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-11.
    10. Magdalena Kaup & Dorota Lozowicka & Agnieszka Deja & Krzysztof Czaplicki, 2021. "Concept of the E-Waste Management Model on Sea-Going Ships," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 444-458.
    11. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    12. Hani Alyami & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zaili Yang & Ramin Riahi & Stephen Bonsall & Jin Wang, 2014. "An advanced risk analysis approach for container port safety evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 634-650, December.
    13. Jūratė Liebuvienė & Kristina Čižiūnienė, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Ports on the Eastern Baltic Sea Coast," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Peter W. De Langen & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2005. "Analysis Of The Benefits Of Intra-Port Competition," Industrial Organization 0510003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Oct 2005.
    15. Adolf K.Y. Ng & Sergi Saurí & Mateu Turró, 2013. "Short sea shipping in Europe: issues, policies and challenges," Chapters, in: Mattias Finger & Torben Holvad (ed.), Regulating Transport in Europe, chapter 8, pages 196-217, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Carlo Altomonte & Laura Bonacorsi & Italo Colantobe, 2018. "Trade and Growth in the Age of Global Value Chains," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1897, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    17. Olivier Dehoorne & Nathalie Petit-Charles, 2011. "Cruise tourism and Cruise Industry [Tourisme de croisière et industrie de la croisière]," Post-Print hal-01368511, HAL.
    18. Marcello Risitano & Francesco Parola & Alessandra Turi & Marco Ferretti, 2017. "Green practices in port authority management: A multiple case study," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 127-145.
    19. Bai, Xiwen & Zhang, Xiunian & Li, Kevin X. & Zhou, Yaoming & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Research topics and trends in the maritime transport: A structural topic model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 11-24.
    20. Shiyuan Zheng & Rudy R. Negenborn, 2017. "Terminal investment timing decisions in a competitive setting with uncertainty using a real option approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 392-411, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cruise ports; waste reception facilities; Mediterranean; ports; MARPOL; sustainable cruise;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F64 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Environment
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spd:journl:v:67:y:2016:i:1:p:54-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/depirgr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.