IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v2y2024i2p295-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Generational Differences In Attitudes Toward Human-Like Robots

Author

Listed:
  • Maria BARBUL

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina BOJESCU

    (: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Miruna NICULESCU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The rapid advancement of robotic technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked widespread interest and debate regarding their integration into various aspects of daily life. As robots become increasingly capable of performing tasks traditionally carried out by humans, understanding public perception of these technologies becomes crucial. The objective of this paper is to explore the generational differences in attitudes toward robots. While younger generations may be more open to the integration of robots into daily life, addressing the concerns of older generations will be crucial for widespread acceptance. This analysis highlights the importance of considering generational perspectives when developing and implementing robotic technologies in various sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria BARBUL & Irina BOJESCU & Miruna NICULESCU, 2024. "Exploring Generational Differences In Attitudes Toward Human-Like Robots," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 295-306, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:295-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/AUOES.December.2024.25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Kim & Ann L. McGill, 2011. "Gaming with Mr. Slot or Gaming the Slot Machine? Power, Anthropomorphism, and Risk Perception," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(1), pages 94-107.
    2. Olimpia Ban & Irina Maiorescu & Mihaela Bucur & Gabriel Cristian Sabou & Betty Cohen Tzedec, 2024. "AI between Threat and Benefactor for the Competences of the Human Working Force," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 762-762, August.
    3. Haenlein, Michael & Kaplan, Andreas, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and robotics: Shaking up the business world and society at large," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 405-407.
    4. Riegger, Anne-Sophie & Klein, Jan F. & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2021. "Technology-enabled personalization in retail stores: Understanding drivers and barriers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 140-155.
    5. Maggioni, Mario A. & Rossignoli, Domenico, 2023. "If it looks like a human and speaks like a human ... Communication and cooperation in strategic Human–Robot interactions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Pankaj Aggarwal & Ann L. McGill, 2007. "Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 468-479, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 26-42, June.
    2. Malgorzata Karpinska-Krakowiak & Lukasz Skowron & Lachezar Ivanov, 2020. "“I Will Start Saving Natural Resources, Only When You Show Me the Planet as a Person in Danger”: The Effects of Message Framing and Anthropomorphism on Pro-Environmental Behaviors that are Viewed as E," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Jacob C. Lee & Sara Kim & Phyllis Xue Wang, 2022. "Anthropomorphizing makes material goods as happiness-inducing as experiences," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 61-73, March.
    4. Song, Christina Soyoung & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2022. "The role of the human-robot interaction in consumers’ acceptance of humanoid retail service robots," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 489-503.
    5. Han, Jie & Wang, Desheng & Yang, Zhihao, 2023. "Acting like an interpersonal relationship: Cobrand anthropomorphism increases product evaluation and purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Han, Nah Ray & Baek, Tae Hyun & Yoon, Sukki & Kim, Yeonshin, 2019. "Is that coffee mug smiling at me? How anthropomorphism impacts the effectiveness of desirability vs. feasibility appeals in sustainability advertising," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 352-361.
    7. Huang, Jingya & Wang, Liangyan & Chan, Eugene, 2024. "When does anthropomorphism hurt? How tool anthropomorphism negatively affects consumers' rewards for tool users," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Noor Hasmini Binti Abd Ghani & Mohammad Kashedul Wahab Tuhin, 2016. "Consumer Brand Relationships," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 950-957.
    9. Justina Sidlauskiene & Yannick Joye & Vilte Auruskeviciene, 2023. "AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Golossenko, Artyom & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Aroean, Lukman, 2020. "Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 737-755.
    11. Ying Ding & Sunxu Xu, 2023. "Detrimental impact of contagious disease cues on consumer preference for anthropomorphic products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 139-153, March.
    12. Ahreum Maeng & Pankaj Aggarwal & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Zeynep Gürhan-CanlıAssociate Editor, 2018. "Facing Dominance: Anthropomorphism and the Effect of Product Face Ratio on Consumer Preference," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1104-1122.
    13. Chao Wang & Qiuqin Zheng & Haimei Zeng & Riwen Lai & Anxin Xu, 2023. "Can Anthropomorphic Slogans Awaken Tourists’ Environmental Responsibility Behavior? Experimental Study Based on Frame Effect Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    14. Barney, Christian & Hancock, Tyler & Esmark Jones, Carol L. & Kazandjian, Brett & Collier, Joel E., 2022. "Ideally human-ish: How anthropomorphized do you have to be in shopper-facing retail technology?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 685-705.
    15. Velasco, Franklin & Yang, Zhiyong & Janakiraman, Narayanan, 2021. "A meta-analytic investigation of consumer response to anthropomorphic appeals: The roles of product type and uncertainty avoidance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 735-746.
    16. Moritz Jörling & Robert Böhm & Stefanie Paluch, 2020. "Mechanisms and Consequences of Anthropomorphizing Autonomous Products," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 485-510, October.
    17. Xie, Yi & Chen, Ke & Guo, Xiaoling, 2020. "Online anthropomorphism and consumers’ privacy concern: Moderating roles of need for interaction and social exclusion," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    18. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 26-42, June.
    19. Ketron, Seth & Naletelich, Kelly, 2019. "Victim or beggar? Anthropomorphic messengers and the savior effect in consumer sustainability behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 73-84.
    20. Liu, Fu & Wei, Haiying & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "Warmth or competence: Brand anthropomorphism, social exclusion, and advertisement effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    artificial intelligence; robots; consumers; anthropomorphic; acceptance; generations.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:295-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.