IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2014i1p802-812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Backtesting Value At Risk Models In The Presence Of Structural Break On The Romanian And Hungarian Stock Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Cociuba Mihail Ioan

    (University of Oradea, FSE)

  • Zapodeanu Daniela
  • Kulcsar Edina

Abstract

Transactions on financial markets are associated with variability, risk and uncertainty, so quantification of risk has a great importance. Beside Standard Deviation and Variance, one of the most involved risk measure methods is Value-at-Risk (VaR). In this study, we use daily return for the stock index from Romania (BET) and Hungary (BUX) for the 01:2007 - 02:2013 periods in order to test the influence of structural breaks on the VaR metrics. We find out that the ARCH phenomenon is present, so we use the GARCH family models. The structural breaks in the series mean and variance are identified using the Zivot-Andrews test and PELT algorithm, the structural break dates are captured using dummy variables in the GARCH models (struc-GARCH), the selection of models is done using the informational criterion [Akaike, Schwarz, Log-likelihood]. The results of present research show a greater volatility associated with a higher risk level in case of Romanian stock index. The stock market indices return follows a negatively skewed and leptokurtic distributions forms either in two cases, so is unspecific a normal distribution. After applying above mentioned tests we can conclude that there are eight structural breaks in BET index returns variance and there are five breakpoints in case of BUX. The breakpoints in mean show very closely results in time, for BET in February 2009 and for BUX March 2009. Backtesting VaR models are done by measuring the number of times the loss is greater than the VaR forecast. The first step for unconditional coverage testing consists in comparing of fraction of VaR violation for a particular risk model. The independence testing it is very important tool in back-testing, because it is not the same that the VaR violations are differentiated in time or there are clustered in some certain period. By checking the independence test, we have the possibility to discover and reject the model with clustered hit sequence. Testing the influence of structural breaks on VaR we find that incorporating structural breaks in the GJR-GARCH models generates lower violations when comparing with the plain GJR-GARCH or RiskMetrics methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Cociuba Mihail Ioan & Zapodeanu Daniela & Kulcsar Edina, 2014. "Backtesting Value At Risk Models In The Presence Of Structural Break On The Romanian And Hungarian Stock Markets," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 802-812, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:802-812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n1/087.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zivot, Eric & Andrews, Donald W K, 2002. "Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 25-44, January.
    2. Kerkhof, F.L.J., 2003. "Model risk analysis for risk management and option pricing," Other publications TiSEM 01692df5-4c2d-4ed2-8108-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    4. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    5. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    6. Engle, Robert F. & Manganelli, Simone, 2001. "Value at risk models in finance," Working Paper Series 75, European Central Bank.
    7. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Amendola & V. Candila, 2016. "Evaluation of volatility predictions in a VaR framework," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 695-709, May.
    2. Szubzda Filip & Chlebus Marcin, 2019. "Comparison of Block Maxima and Peaks Over Threshold Value-at-Risk models for market risk in various economic conditions," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 6(53), pages 70-85, January.
    3. Allen, David E. & Amram, Ron & McAleer, Michael, 2013. "Volatility spillovers from the Chinese stock market to economic neighbours," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 238-257.
    4. Chao Wang & Richard Gerlach, 2021. "A Bayesian realized threshold measurement GARCH framework for financial tail risk forecasting," Papers 2106.00288, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    5. E. Ramos-P'erez & P. J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & J. J. N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2006.16383, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    6. Mohamed El Ghourabi & Christian Francq & Fedya Telmoudi, 2016. "Consistent Estimation of the Value at Risk When the Error Distribution of the Volatility Model is Misspecified," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 46-76, January.
    7. Chao Wang & Richard Gerlach, 2019. "Semi-parametric Realized Nonlinear Conditional Autoregressive Expectile and Expected Shortfall," Papers 1906.09961, arXiv.org.
    8. Dahiru A. Balaa & Taro Takimotob, 2017. "Stock markets volatility spillovers during financial crises: A DCC-MGARCH with skewed-t density approach," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 17(1), pages 25-48, March.
    9. Carol Alexander & Emese Lazar & Silvia Stanescu, 2011. "Analytic Approximations to GARCH Aggregated Returns Distributions with Applications to VaR and ETL," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2011-08, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    10. Hoogerheide, Lennart & van Dijk, Herman K., 2010. "Bayesian forecasting of Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall using adaptive importance sampling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 231-247, April.
    11. Stavroyiannis, S. & Makris, I. & Nikolaidis, V. & Zarangas, L., 2012. "Econometric modeling and value-at-risk using the Pearson type-IV distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 10-17.
    12. Allen, David E. & McAleer, Michael & Powell, Robert J. & Singh, Abhay K., 2017. "Volatility Spillovers from Australia's major trading partners across the GFC," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 159-175.
    13. Timotheos Angelidis & Stavros Degiannakis, 2007. "Backtesting VaR Models: An Expected Shortfall Approach," Working Papers 0701, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    14. Claudeci Da Silva & Hugo Agudelo Murillo & Joaquim Miguel Couto, 2014. "Early Warning Systems: Análise De Ummodelo Probit De Contágio De Crise Dos Estados Unidos Para O Brasil(2000-2010)," Anais do XL Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 40th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 110, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    15. Med Imen Gallali & Raggad Zahraa, 2012. "Evaluation of VaR models' forecasting performance: the case of oil markets," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 197-215.
    16. Sadorsky, Perry, 2006. "Modeling and forecasting petroleum futures volatility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 467-488, July.
    17. Tse, Chin-Bun & Rodgers, Timothy & Niklewski, Jacek, 2014. "The 2007 financial crisis and the UK residential housing market: Did the relationship between interest rates and house prices change?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 518-530.
    18. Sergii Pypko, 2015. "Volatility Forecast in Crises and Expansions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Yuzhi Cai, 2021. "Estimating expected shortfall using a quantile function model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4332-4360, July.
    20. Franses,Philip Hans & Dijk,Dick van & Opschoor,Anne, 2014. "Time Series Models for Business and Economic Forecasting," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521520911, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stock market; structural break; Value at Risk; GARCH;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:802-812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.