IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2026i1p110-134.html

Political Economy of Technological Revolutions

Author

Listed:
  • Hristo Prodanov

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The object of the research is the logic of technological revolutions, and its subject is the complex systemic interaction between the technological, economic and political subsystems that significantly shape the entire political-economic system. The object and subject of the research predetermine its purpose, which is to uncover the broader picture of the overall political-economic transformation that occurs with each subsequent technological revolution, particularly in the context of the ongoing Fourth Technological Revolution. This goal necessitates a political-economic approach to the research, one that facilitates the understanding of the logic behind systemic change. The approach emphasizes the study of three key factors – technology, economy, and politics – and the intricate interactions between them in the shaping of the political-economic systems at various stages of capitalism's development. Consequently, the research is structured to first establish a general methodological framework for the political economy of technological revolutions, then to conduct a systemic analysis of the evolving interactions between technology, economy, and politics, and finally to explore how these elements transform the overall political-economic system. This topic is particularly relevant amid the ongoing changes brought about by the Fourth Technological Revolution, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive theoretical framework to understand these developments and prevent potential catastrophic outcomes. Inevitably, there are limitations due to the vast scope of interrelationships under investigation and the constraints of addressing them fully within the publication's requirements. These limitations do not undermine the overall validity of the conclusions, as the identified causal and functional relationships do not diminish the findings or the contributions made toward establishing a unified paradigmatic framework. This framework serves as an "ideal type" for understanding technological revolutions within the context of the ongoing Fourth technological, rather than focusing on specific instances or manifestations of related phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Hristo Prodanov, 2026. "Political Economy of Technological Revolutions," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 110-134, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2026:i:1:p:110-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2026.1/EA.2026.1.06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:osf:socarx:x7pcy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kasy, Maximilian, 2023. "The Political Economy of AI: Towards Democratic Control of the Means of Prediction," SocArXiv x7pcy, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jho, Whasun, 2007. "Global political economy of technology standardization: A case of the Korean mobile telecommunications market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 124-138, March.
    4. Ben R. Martin & Paul Nightingale (ed.), 2000. "The Political Economy of Science, Technology and Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1660.
    5. J. R. Ward, 1994. "The industrial revolution and British imperialism, 1750–1850," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 47(1), pages 44-65, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaudhary, Latika & Rubin, Jared, 2011. "Reading, writing, and religion: Institutions and human capital formation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 17-33, March.
    2. Roth, Florian & Warnke, Philine & Niessen, Pia & Edler, Jakob, 2021. "Insights into systemic resilience from innovation research [Systemische Resilienz - Einsichten aus der Innovationsforschung]," Perspectives – Policy Briefs 03 / 2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Freyburg, Tina & Garbe, Lisa & Wavre, Véronique, 2022. "The political power of internet business: A comprehensive dataset of Telecommunications Ownership and Control (TOSCO)," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online fi, pages 1-1.
    4. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    5. Vialle, Pierre & Song, Junjie & Zhang, Jian, 2012. "Competing with dominant global standards in a catching-up context. The case of mobile standards in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 832-846.
    6. Lee, Won Sang & Sohn, So Young, 2018. "Effects of standardization on the evolution of information and communications technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 308-317.
    7. Burdin, Gabriel & Dughera, Stefano & Landini, Fabio & Belloc, Filippo, 2023. "Contested Transparency: Digital Monitoring Technologies and Worker Voice," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1340, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    8. Bruno Basalisco & Andy Reid & Paul Richards, 2010. "Interdependent Innovation in Telecommunications: Risk, Standardization and Regulation," Chapters, in: Anastassios Gentzoglanis & Anders Henten (ed.), Regulation and the Evolution of the Global Telecommunications Industry, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Ernesto Rengifo García & Francisco E. Beneke Ávila, 2021. "Los derechos de propiedad intelectual y la libre competencia," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1301.
    10. Kim, Hongbum & Shin, Dong-Hee & Lee, Daeho, 2015. "A socio-technical analysis of software policy in Korea: Towards a central role for building ICT ecosystems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 944-956.
    11. Menezes, Jose H. V., 2010. "The political economy of innovation; an institutional analysis of industrial policy and development in Brazil," MPRA Paper 28849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Keith Smith, 2006. "Public Policy Framework for the New Zealand Innovation System," Occasional Papers 06/6, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand.
    13. McLeish, Caitriona & Nightingale, Paul, 2007. "Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1635-1654, December.
    14. Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada, 2025. "Is it possible to assess the speed of development embedded by any industrial revolution on the society? An analysis under the application of the IRIDS-Index," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4137-4157, October.
    15. Roth, Florian & Warnke, Philine & Niessen, Pia & Edler, Jakob, 2021. "Systemische Resilienz: Einsichten aus der Innovationsforschung [Insights into systemic resilience from innovation research]," Perspectives – Policy Briefs 03 / 2021 (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    16. Giachetti, Claudio & Marchi, Gianluca, 2017. "Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 352-364.
    17. Whang, Yun-kyung & Hobday, Michael, 2011. "Local 'Test Bed' Market Demand in the Transition to Leadership: The Case of the Korean Mobile Handset Industry," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1358-1371, August.
    18. Hong Jiang & Shukuan Zhao & Zhi Li & Yong Chen, 2016. "Interaction between technology standardization and technology development: a coupling effect study," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 229-243, September.
    19. Gupta, Ruchita & Jain, Karuna, 2016. "Competition effect of a new mobile technology on an incumbent technology: An Indian case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 332-342.
    20. Tina Freyburg & Lisa Garbe & Véronique Wavre, 2023. "The political power of internet business: A comprehensive dataset of Telecommunications Ownership and Control (TOSCO)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 573-600, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • P51 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2026:i:1:p:110-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.