IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2018i39p155-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Industrial Policy in the Age of the New Industrial Revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Tolkachev, S.

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The prolonged world economic uncertainty for last 10 years, testifies to tectonic shifts in the world economic structure, and, in particular, about the gradual transformation of global production. Reindustrialization and reshoring in the US, coupled with the protectionist policy of D. Trump, confirm the thesis of a radical restructuring of the world industrial landscape on the new industrial revolution background. The article advances a hypothesis of a new industrial paradigm "global design - local production" on the basis of industrial Internet and additive technologies. Network organization, inherent in the new paradigm, generates new forms of industrial development assistance. A hypothesis is proposed to stop the orientation to the "scale effect" in the conduct of a network industrial policy. Network industrial policy must take into account that production and consumption cease to be separate phases in the system of social reproduction, consumers are able to partially perform the functions of a co-productor, and producers become consumers of crowdsourcing services. A criterial comparison is made of the network industrial policy inherent in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, with vertical and horizontal industrial policies operating in the era of the previous industrial revolutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tolkachev, S., 2018. "Network Industrial Policy in the Age of the New Industrial Revolution," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 155-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:39:p:155-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2018-39-155-162r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," Working Paper Series rwp04-047, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Jean Imbs & Romain Wacziarg, 2003. "Stages of Diversification," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 63-86, March.
    3. Pack, Howard & Saggi, Kamal, 2006. "The case for industrial policy : a critical survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3839, The World Bank.
    4. Ken Warwick, 2013. "Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olga Romanova & Alena Ponomareva, 2019. "Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part I," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 13-28.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Sinelnikov-Murylev & A. Radygin & L. Freinkman & N. Glavatskaya (ed.), 2014. "RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN 2013 Trends and Outlooks (Issue 35)," Books, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, edition 1, volume 35, number 5.
    2. Yuri Simachev & Mikhail Kuzyk & Boris Kuznetsov & Evgeniy Pogrebnyak, 2014. "Russia on the path towards a new technology industrial policy: Exciting prospects and Fatal Traps," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(4 (eng)), pages 6-23.
    3. Simachev, Y. & Kuzyk, M. & Pogrebnyak, E., 2018. "Federal Industrial Policy: Basic Models and Russian Practice," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 146-154.
    4. Olga Romanova & Alena Ponomareva, 2019. "Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part I," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 13-28.
    5. Dennis, Allen & Shepherd, Ben, 2007. "Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
    6. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    7. Tom Broekel & Lars Mewes, 2017. "Analyzing the impact of R&D policy on regional diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1726, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2017.
    8. Shastitko, A., 2014. "Industrial and Competition Policy: from Theory to Practice of Interaction," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 205-209.
    9. Anders Gustafsson & Andreas Stephan & Alice Hallman & Nils Karlsson, 2016. "The “sugar rush” from innovation subsidies: a robust political economy perspective," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 43(4), pages 729-756, November.
    10. Marcela Meléndez Arjona & Guillermo Perry, 2009. "Industrial policies in Colombia," Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 9138, Fedesarrollo.
    11. Demir, FIrat & Dahi, Omar S., 2011. "Asymmetric effects of financial development on South-South and South-North trade: Panel data evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 139-149, January.
    12. Harrison, Ann & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2010. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4039-4214, Elsevier.
    13. Dennis Coates & Iuliia Naidenova & Petr Parshakov, 2019. "Determinants of governmental support of Russian companies: lessons on industrial policy, rent-seeking and corruption," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 438-466, December.
    14. Bernard Hoekman & Will Martin & Carlos A. Primo Braga, 2009. "Trade Preference Erosion : Measurement and Policy Response," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 9437.
    15. Annalisa Caloffi & Marco Mariani, 2018. "Regional policy mixes for enterprise and innovation: A fuzzy-set clustering approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 28-46, February.
    16. Wu, Yiyun & Zhu, Xiwei & Groenewold, Nicolaas, 2019. "The determinants and effectiveness of industrial policy in china: A study based on Five-Year Plans," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 225-242.
    17. Felipe Starosta de Waldemar, 2010. "How costly is rent-seeking to diversification: an empirical approach," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    18. Herr, Hansjörg & Schweisshelm, Erwin & Truong, Minh Huy Vu, 2016. "The integration of Vietnam in the global economy and its effects for Vietnamese economic development," GLU Working Papers 44, Global Labour University (GLU).
    19. Alberto Amurgo-Pacheco, Martha Denisse Pierola, 2007. "Patterns of export diversification in developing countries: intensive and extensive margins," IHEID Working Papers 20-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Jul 2007.
    20. Benhassine, Najy & Raballand, Gaël, 2009. "Beyond ideological cleavages: A unifying framework for industrial policies and other public interventions," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 293-309, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    industrialization; structural change; industrial policy; innovation; globalization; development policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • F68 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:39:p:155-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.