IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2018i39p146-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federal Industrial Policy: Basic Models and Russian Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Simachev, Y.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Kuzyk, M.

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics: Interdepartmental Analytical Center, Moscow, Russia)

  • Pogrebnyak, E.

    (Vnesheconombank, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article typologies the Russian industrial policy of the 2000s, discusses major initiatives in this area, as well as changes in the state's approach to the industrial policy. The tendency of the state to implement vertical policy is noted; while horizontal mechanisms are often "verticalized" under the influence of traditional interest groups. The state actively initiates new support measures, especially in crises and at the same time seldom terminates some existing ineffective instruments. In the period under review, the state more often appealed to the policy of catching-up development. In modern conditions, the government is likely to make significant efforts to implement the policy of breakthrough development. For the success of such a policy, it will be necessary to move in time from supporting local achievements of individual companies to creating conditions for the fast spread of new technologies and promising business models. In turn, this requires a transition of state governance from a culture of project management to a culture of quality execution of routines.

Suggested Citation

  • Simachev, Y. & Kuzyk, M. & Pogrebnyak, E., 2018. "Federal Industrial Policy: Basic Models and Russian Practice," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 146-154.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:39:p:146-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2018-39-146-154r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," CEPR Discussion Papers 4767, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Simachev, Yu. & Kuzyk, M., 2012. "The State Anti-Crisis Support of Russian Companies: Assistance and Restrictions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 100-125.
    3. Justin Yifu Lin, 2012. "New Structural Economics : A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2232.
    4. Yuri Simachev & Mikhail Kuzyk & Boris Kuznetsov & Evgeniy Pogrebnyak, 2014. "Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology-Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 8(4), pages 6-23.
    5. V. Mau., 2010. "Economic Policy in 2009: Between the Crisis and Modernization," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 2.
    6. Kuznetsov, B. & Simachev, Yu., 2014. "Evolution of State Industrial Policy in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 152-178.
    7. Howard Pack & Kamal Saggi, 2006. "Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 21(2), pages 267-297.
    8. Pack, Howard & Saggi, Kamal, 2006. "The case for industrial policy : a critical survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3839, The World Bank.
    9. Gual, Jordi & Jodar, Sandra, 2006. "Vertical industrial policy in the EU: an empirical analysis of the effectiveness of state aid," EIB Papers 10/2006, European Investment Bank, Economics Department.
    10. Dani Rodrik, 2008. "Normalizing Industrial Policy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28009.
    11. Ken Warwick, 2013. "Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fedyunina, A. & Simachev, Yu. & Kuzyk, M. & Averyanova, Yu., 2020. "Structural features of Russian economy integration into global value chains and lessons for structural policy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 106-127.
    2. Olga Romanova & Alena Ponomareva, 2019. "Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part I," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 13-28.
    3. Golovanova, Svetlana V. (Головановаб Светлана) & Korneeva, Dina V. (Корнеева, Дина) & Sidorova, Elena E. (Сидорова, Елена) & Yusupova, Gyuzel F. (Юсоповаб Гюзель), 2019. "Single Wholesale Network for 5G: Quantitative Assessment of Market Impact [Единый Оператор Инфраструктуры 5g: Количественная Оценка Влияния На Рынки]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 166-193, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Romanova & Alena Ponomareva, 2019. "Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part I," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 13-28.
    2. Yuri Simachev & Mikhail Kuzyk & Boris Kuznetsov & Evgeniy Pogrebnyak, 2014. "Russia on the path towards a new technology industrial policy: Exciting prospects and Fatal Traps," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 8(4 (eng)), pages 6-23.
    3. S. Sinelnikov-Murylev & A. Radygin & L. Freinkman & N. Glavatskaya (ed.), 2014. "RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN 2013 Trends and Outlooks (Issue 35)," Books, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, edition 1, volume 35, number 5.
    4. Wu, Yiyun & Zhu, Xiwei & Groenewold, Nicolaas, 2019. "The determinants and effectiveness of industrial policy in china: A study based on Five-Year Plans," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 225-242.
    5. Finbarr Livesey, 2012. "Rationales for Industrial Policy Based on Industry Maturity," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 349-363, September.
    6. Olga A. Romanova, 2019. "Evolution of institutions for new industrial policy implementation," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 14-24, July.
    7. E. B. Lenchuk, 2016. "Course on new industrialization: A global trend of economic development," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 332-340, May.
    8. Lazzarini, Sergio G. & Musacchio, Aldo, 2010. "Leviathan as a Minority Shareholder: A Study of Equity Purchases by the Brazilian National Development Bank (BNDES), 1995-2003," Insper Working Papers wpe_221, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    9. Shastitko, A., 2014. "Industrial and Competition Policy: from Theory to Practice of Interaction," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 205-209.
    10. Bernard Hoekman & Will Martin & Carlos A. Primo Braga, 2009. "Trade Preference Erosion : Measurement and Policy Response," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 9437.
    11. Martin Ravallion, 2013. "The Idea of Antipoverty Policy," NBER Working Papers 19210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Annalisa Caloffi & Marco Mariani, 2018. "Regional policy mixes for enterprise and innovation: A fuzzy-set clustering approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 28-46, February.
    13. Çiğdem Börke Tunali & Jan Fidrmuc, 2015. "State Aid Policy in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 1143-1162, September.
    14. Shimada, Go, 2013. "The Economic Implications Of Comprehensive Approach To Learning On Industrial Development (Policy And Managerial Capability Learning):," Working Papers 1001, JICA Research Institute.
    15. Benhassine, Najy & Raballand, Gaël, 2009. "Beyond ideological cleavages: A unifying framework for industrial policies and other public interventions," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 293-309, December.
    16. Vu, Khuong M., 2018. "Embracing globalization to promote industrialization: Insights from the development of Singapore's petrochemicals industry," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 170-185.
    17. Lazzarini, Sérgio G., 2012. "Strategizing by the Government: Industrial Policy and Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Insper Working Papers wpe_289, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    18. Jingxiao Zhang & Haiyan Xie & Hui Li, 2017. "Positioning and Priorities of Growth Management in Construction Industrialization: Chinese Firm-Level Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Michiko Iizuka & Mulu Gebreeyesus, 2017. "Using Functions of Innovation Systems to Understand the Successful Emergence of Non-traditional Agricultural Export Industries in Developing Countries: Cases from Ethiopia and Chile," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(2), pages 384-403, April.
    20. Olga Romanova, 2018. "Industrial Policy Priorities of Russia in the Context of Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Part 1," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 420-432.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    industrial policy; structural changes; state support; catching-up development; breakthrough development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:39:p:146-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.