IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v7y2024i4d10.1038_s41893-024-01311-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A global meta-analysis of ecological effects from offshore marine artificial structures

Author

Listed:
  • Anaëlle J. Lemasson

    (University of Plymouth)

  • Paul J. Somerfield

    (PML – Plymouth Marine Laboratory)

  • Michaela Schratzberger

    (Cefas - Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory)

  • Murray S. A. Thompson

    (Cefas - Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory)

  • Louise B. Firth

    (University of Plymouth
    University College Cork)

  • Elena Couce

    (Cefas - Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory)

  • C. Louise McNeill

    (PML – Plymouth Marine Laboratory)

  • Joana Nunes

    (PML – Plymouth Marine Laboratory)

  • Christine Pascoe

    (PML – Plymouth Marine Laboratory)

  • Stephen C. L. Watson

    (PML – Plymouth Marine Laboratory)

  • Antony M. Knights

    (University of Plymouth
    University College Cork)

Abstract

Marine artificial structures (MAS), including oil and gas installations (O&G) and offshore wind farms (OWFs), have a finite operational period. Selecting the most suitable decommissioning options when reaching end-of-life remains a challenge, in part because their effects are still largely undetermined. Whether decommissioned structures could act (sensu ‘function’) as artificial reefs (ARs) and provide desired ecological benefits is of particular interest. Here we use a meta-analysis approach of 531 effect sizes from 109 articles to assess the ecological effects of MAS, comparing O&G and OWFs to shipwrecks and ARs, with a view to inform their decommissioning. This synthesis demonstrates that while MAS can bring ecological benefits, important idiosyncrasies exist, with differences emerging between MAS types, habitat types, taxa and ecological metrics. Notably, we find limited conclusive evidence that O&G and OWFs would provide significant ecological benefits if decommissioned as ARs. We conclude that decommissioning options aimed at repurposing MAS into ARs may not provide the intended benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Anaëlle J. Lemasson & Paul J. Somerfield & Michaela Schratzberger & Murray S. A. Thompson & Louise B. Firth & Elena Couce & C. Louise McNeill & Joana Nunes & Christine Pascoe & Stephen C. L. Watson & , 2024. "A global meta-analysis of ecological effects from offshore marine artificial structures," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(4), pages 485-495, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01311-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-024-01311-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01311-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-024-01311-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. B. Bugnot & M. Mayer-Pinto & L. Airoldi & E. C. Heery & E. L. Johnston & L. P. Critchley & E. M. A. Strain & R. L. Morris & L. H. L. Loke & M. J. Bishop & E. V. Sheehan & R. A. Coleman & K. A. Daff, 2021. "Current and projected global extent of marine built structures," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 33-41, January.
    2. Techera, Erika J. & Chandler, John, 2015. "Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: Do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 53-60.
    3. Gourvenec, Susan & Sturt, Fraser & Reid, Emily & Trigos, Federico, 2022. "Global assessment of historical, current and forecast ocean energy infrastructure: Implications for marine space planning, sustainable design and end-of-engineered-life management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Clara Camarasa & Érika Mata & Juan Pablo Jiménez Navarro & Janet Reyna & Paula Bezerra & Gerd Brantes Angelkorte & Wei Feng & Faidra Filippidou & Sebastian Forthuber & Chioke Harris & Nina Holck Sandb, 2022. "A global comparison of building decarbonization scenarios by 2050 towards 1.5–2 °C targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Whitney S Beck & Ed K Hall, 2018. "Confounding factors in algal phosphorus limitation experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Tianyi Qiu & Yu Shi & Josep Peñuelas & Ji Liu & Qingliang Cui & Jordi Sardans & Feng Zhou & Longlong Xia & Weiming Yan & Shuling Zhao & Shushi Peng & Jinshi Jian & Qinsi He & Wenju Zhang & Min Huang &, 2024. "Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Xindong Xue & W. Robert Reed & Robbie C.M. van Aert, 2022. "Social Capital and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 22/20, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    4. Carlo Ferri Marini & Philippe Tadger & Isaac Armando Chávez-Guevara & Elizabeth Tipton & Marco Meucci & Zoran Nikolovski & Francisco Jose Amaro-Gahete & Ratko Peric, 2022. "Factors Determining the Agreement between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Maximal Fat Oxidation: Follow-Up on a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Association," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Yu, Dalei & Ding, Chang & He, Na & Wang, Ruiwu & Zhou, Xiaohua & Shi, Lei, 2019. "Robust estimation and confidence interval in meta-regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 93-118.
    7. Francesca Pilotto & Ingolf Kühn & Rita Adrian & Renate Alber & Audrey Alignier & Christopher Andrews & Jaana Bäck & Luc Barbaro & Deborah Beaumont & Natalie Beenaerts & Sue Benham & David S. Boukal & , 2020. "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Shannon G. Klein & Cassandra Roch & Carlos M. Duarte, 2024. "Systematic review of the uncertainty of coral reef futures under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:972-988 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Cai Cheng & Zekang Liu & Wei Song & Xue Chen & Zhijie Zhang & Bo Li & Mark Kleunen & Jihua Wu, 2024. "Biodiversity increases resistance of grasslands against plant invasions under multiple environmental changes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Jonas Schmidt & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2020. "Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 499-518, May.
    12. James G. Field & Frank A. Bosco & David Kraichy & Krista L. Uggerslev & Mingang K. Geiger, 2021. "More alike than different? A comparison of variance explained by cross-cultural models," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(9), pages 1797-1817, December.
    13. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    14. Abdo, Hafez & Mangena, Musa & Needham, Graham & Hunt, David, 2018. "Disclosure of provisions for decommissioning costs in annual reports of oil and gas companies: A content analysis and stakeholder views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 341-358.
    15. Wei-Yu Lin & Ian W Brock & Dan Connley & Helen Cramp & Rachel Tucker & Jon Slate & Malcolm W R Reed & Sabapathy P Balasubramanian & Lisa A Cannon-Albright & Nicola J Camp & Angela Cox, 2013. "Associations of ATR and CHEK1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-1, July.
    16. Erin V Satterthwaite & Valeriya Komyakova & Natalia G Erazo & Louise Gammage & Gabriel A Juma & Rachel Kelly & Daniel Kleinman & Delphine Lobelle & Rachel Sapery James & Norlaila Binti Mohd Zanuri, 2022. "Five actionable pillars to engage the next generation of leaders in the co-design of transformative ocean solutions," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Leonie Kuen & Daniel Westmattelmann & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Who earns trust in online environments? A meta-analysis of trust in technology and trust in provider for technology acceptance," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Tsung-Yuan Hsiao & Wen-Ta Tseng, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Test-Retest Reliability in Language Anxiety Research: Is Language Anxiety Stable or Variable?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    19. Mario Herberz & Tobias Brosch & Ulf J. J. Hahnel, 2020. "Kilo what? Default units increase value sensitivity in joint evaluations of energy efficiency," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 972-988, November.
    20. repec:osf:metaar:tp45u_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Piers Steel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 23-44, February.
    22. Marina Wolowski & Tia-Lynn Ashman & Leandro Freitas, 2014. "Meta-Analysis of Pollen Limitation Reveals the Relevance of Pollination Generalization in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01311-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.