IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v1y2017i7d10.1038_s41562-017-0133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers

Author

Listed:
  • Kirk Bansak

    (Immigration Policy Lab, Stanford University
    ETH Zurich
    Stanford University
    Graduate School of Business, Stanford University)

  • Jens Hainmueller

    (Immigration Policy Lab, Stanford University
    ETH Zurich
    Stanford University
    Graduate School of Business, Stanford University)

  • Dominik Hangartner

    (Immigration Policy Lab, Stanford University
    ETH Zurich
    Stanford University
    Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich)

Abstract

What type of common asylum regime would Europeans support? We conducted a survey asking 18,000 citizens of 15 European countries about their preferences regarding different mechanisms for allocating asylum seekers across countries. A large majority supports an allocation that is proportional to each country’s capacity over the status quo policy of allocation based on the country of first entry. This majority support is weakened but persists even among a randomly assigned subset of respondents who were made aware that moving to proportional allocation would increase the number of asylum seekers allocated to their own country. These results suggest that citizens care deeply about the fairness of the responsibility-sharing mechanism, rather than only the consequences of the asylum policy. The findings also highlight a potential pathway towards reform of the Common European Asylum System.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirk Bansak & Jens Hainmueller & Dominik Hangartner, 2017. "Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 1-6, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0133
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0133
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-017-0133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne-Marie Jeannet & Tobias Heidland & Martin Ruhs, 2021. "What asylum and refugee policies do Europeans want? Evidence from a cross-national conjoint experiment," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 353-376, September.
    2. Hangartner, Dominik & Sarvimäki, Matti & Spirig, Judith, 2021. "Managing Refugee Protection Crises: Policy Lessons from Economics and Political Science," IZA Discussion Papers 14821, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Paul Vertier & Max Viskanic & Matteo Gamalerio, 2020. "Dismantling the 'Jungle' : Relocation and Extreme Voting in France," Working Papers hal-03385832, HAL.
    4. Zimmermann, Severin & Stutzer, Alois, 2022. "The consequences of hosting asylum seekers for citizens’ policy preferences," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Sharon Baute, 2023. "Mass Euroscepticism revisited: The role of distributive justice," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(4), pages 625-644, December.
    6. Anthony Edo & Lionel Ragot & Hillel Rapoport & Sulin Sardoschau & Andreas Steinmayr, 2018. "The Effects of Immigration in Developed Countries: Insights from Recent Economic Research," CEPII Policy Brief 2018-22, CEPII research center.
    7. Biró, Péter & Gudmundsson, Jens, 2021. "Complexity of finding Pareto-efficient allocations of highest welfare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 614-628.
    8. Marc Helbling, 2020. "Attitudes towards climate change migrants," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 89-102, May.
    9. Pan, An & Zhang, Wenna & Shi, Xunpeng & Dai, Ling, 2022. "Climate policy and low-carbon innovation: Evidence from low-carbon city pilots in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2020. "Labor market concerns and support for immigration," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Pieter Vanhuysse & Michael Jankowski & Markus Tepe, 2021. "Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 493-506, September.
    12. Philipp Lergetporer & Marc Piopiunik & Lisa Simon, 2017. "Does the Education Level of Refugees Affect Natives' Attitudes?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6832, CESifo.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/39r598j3pm8vmq8cj5p2pnev7v is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:hal:journl:hal-03385832 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Vrânceanu, Alina & Dinas, Elias & Heidland, Tobias & Ruhs, Martin, 2023. "The European refugee crisis and public support for the externalisation of migration management," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 279441, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Helbling, Marc, 2020. "Attitudes towards climate change migrants," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 160(1), pages 89-102.
    17. Lergetporer, Philipp & Piopiunik, Marc & Simon, Lisa, 2021. "Does the education level of refugees affect natives’ attitudes?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Petros Xepapadeas & Ioannis Mourtos, 2022. "Refugee allocation mechanisms: theory and applications for the European Union," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4557-4584, September.
    19. Lisa Simon, 2019. "Microeconometric Analyses on Determinants of Individual Labour Market Outcomes," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 83.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.