IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v116y2019p5293-5298.html

Testing for crowd out in social nudges: Evidence from a natural field experiment in the market for electricity

Author

Listed:
  • Alec Brandon

    (Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637)

  • John A. List

    (Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637)

  • Robert D. Metcalfe

    (Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215)

  • Michael K. Price

    (Department of Economics, Finance, and Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487)

  • Florian Rundhammer

    (Department of Economics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302)

Abstract

This study considers the response of household electricity consumption to social nudges during peak load events. Our investigation considers two social nudges. The first targets conservation during peak load events, while the second promotes aggregate conservation. Using data from a natural field experiment with 42,100 households, we find that both social nudges reduce peak load electricity consumption by 2 to 4% when implemented in isolation and by nearly 7% when implemented in combination. These findings suggest an important role for social nudges in the regulation of electricity markets and a limited role for crowd out effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Alec Brandon & John A. List & Robert D. Metcalfe & Michael K. Price & Florian Rundhammer, 2019. "Testing for crowd out in social nudges: Evidence from a natural field experiment in the market for electricity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(12), pages 5293-5298, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:5293-5298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/116/12/5293.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:116:y:2019:p:5293-5298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: PNAS Product Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.