IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2011059070371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model of cost and price relationships for municipal waste management of the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Soukopová

    (Katedra veřejné ekonomie, Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Jiří Hřebíček

    (Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Kamenice 126/3, 625 00 Brno, Česká republika)

Abstract

Presented paper Model of cost and price relationships for municipal waste management of the Czech Republic introduces an integrated waste management model of the Czech Republic which was developed as a balanced network model for a set of sources (mostly municipalities) of municipal solid waste (MSW) connected with a set of chosen waste treatment facilities processing their waste. Model is implemented as a combination of four models including environmental and economic point of view. It enables to formulate the optimisation problem in a concise way and the resulting model is easily scalable. It can be used for waste management planning as a decision support tool. In this case, aggregated emissions of greenhouse gases expressed as CO2 equivalent have been minimised. Model involves composting energy utilization, material recycling, and landfilling. Its size (number of sources and facilities) depends only upon available data. Its application was used as a decision support tool in the case study of optimizing the planning allocation of potential facilities of waste management of the Czech Republic.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Soukopová & Jiří Hřebíček, 2011. "Model of cost and price relationships for municipal waste management of the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 371-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070371
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070371.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070371.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201159070371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rathi, Sarika, 2007. "Optimization model for integrated municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 105-121, February.
    2. Shmelev, S.E. & Powell, J.R., 2006. "Ecological-economic modelling for strategic regional waste management systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 115-130, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maheshi, Danthurebandara & Steven, Van Passel & Karel, Van Acker, 2015. "Environmental and economic assessment of ‘open waste dump’ mining in Sri Lanka," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 67-79.
    2. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Roper, Stuart & Parker, Cathy, 2013. "Doing well by doing good: A quantitative investigation of the litter effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2262-2268.
    5. Mihai, Florin-Constantin & Apostol, Liviu & Lamasanu, Andreea & Ghiurca, Ana-Andreea, 2012. "Spatio-temporal analysis of Romania's rural population access to sanitation services in the context of EU accession," MPRA Paper 62227, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    6. Naeem Ur Rehman Khattak & Suleman Amin, 2013. "Willingness to Pay For the Treatment of Environmental Hazards: A Case Study of Peshawar," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(7), pages 831-842, July.
    7. Sanjay RODE, 2011. "Public Private Partnership In Solid Waste Management In Municipal Corporations Of Mumbai Metropolitan," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(4), pages 23-38, December.
    8. Anna Gronba-Chyła & Agnieszka Generowicz & Paweł Kwaśnicki & Dawid Cycoń & Justyna Kwaśny & Katarzyna Grąz & Krzysztof Gaska & Józef Ciuła, 2022. "Determining the Effectiveness of Street Cleaning with the Use of Decision Analysis and Research on the Reduction in Chloride in Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, May.
    9. Nima Norouzi, 2022. "A Practical and Analytic View on Legal Framework of Circular Economics as One of the Recent Economic Law Insights: A Comparative Legal Study," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 961-986, September.
    10. Stanislav Edward Shmelev (ODID), "undated". "Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis of the UK Economy: Key Sector Analysis," QEH Working Papers qehwps183, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    11. Münster, Marie & Meibom, Peter, 2011. "Optimization of use of waste in the future energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1612-1622.
    12. Sue Ellen Taelman & Davide Tonini & Alexander Wandl & Jo Dewulf, 2018. "A Holistic Sustainability Framework for Waste Management in European Cities: Concept Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-33, June.
    13. Longden, David & Brammer, John & Bastin, Lucy & Cooper, Nic, 2007. "Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2622-2634, April.
    14. Stanislav Edward Shmelev (ODID), "undated". "Multi-criteria Assessment of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: New Dimensions and Stakeholders in the South of France," QEH Working Papers qehwps181, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    15. Bisera Andrić Gušavac & Selman Karagoz & Milena Popović & Dragan Pamućar & Muhammet Deveci, 2023. "Reconcilement of conflicting goals: a novel operations research-based methodology for environmental management," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7423-7460, August.
    16. Minoglou, Minas & Komilis, Dimitrios, 2013. "Optimizing the treatment and disposal of municipal solid wastes using mathematical programming—A case study in a Greek region," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 46-57.
    17. Ajay Singh, 2022. "Sustainable Waste Management Through Systems Engineering Models and Remote Sensing Approaches," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1105-1126, September.
    18. Diaz-Balteiro, L & González-Pachón, J. & Romero, C., 2017. "Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 607-616.
    19. Chen, Chang-Chih & Shyu, So-De & Wu, Yen-Chun & Yang, Chih-Yuan, 2011. "A waste management model for optimal recycling-landfilling policies under macroeconomic conditions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 852-858, May.
    20. Liu, Yinshan & Wang, Yuanfeng & Shi, Chengcheng & Zhang, Weijun & Luo, Wei & Wang, Jingjing & Li, Keping & Yeung, Ngai & Kite, Steve, 2022. "Assessing the CO2 reduction target gap and sustainability for bridges in China by 2040," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.