IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v13y2023i2p155-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Factors Influencing Consumers to adopt EVs (Electric Vehicles)

Author

Listed:
  • Sumas Wongsunopparat
  • Peter Cherian

Abstract

Statista market forecast has shown that revenue in the Electric Vehicles market is projected to reach US$457.60bn in 2023. Revenue is expected to show an annual growth rate (CAGR 2023-2027) of 17.02%, resulting in a projected market volume of US$858.00bn by 2027. Electric vehicles are gaining popularity and market share. In Q2 2022, EV sales accounted for 5.6% of the total auto market (up from 2.7% in Q2 of 2021). Clean energy and improved performance are driving people to make the switch to electric. Government incentives continue to buttress the future of all things electric. Between today and 2050, the electric vehicle market opportunity is slated to rise to $53 trillion. Additionally, global electricity demand in that same year is projected to increase by 27% even though KPMG reports in December 2022 that automotive executives are less bullish than they were last year about the adoption of electric vehicles. The survey found 76% are concerned that inflation and high interest rates will adversely affect their business in 2023. For the U.S., the median expectation for EV sales was 35% of the new vehicle market by 2030 — down from 65% a year earlier.The purpose of this research is to study factors influencing consumer to adopt Electric Vehicles. These factors include seven independent variables- Mileage (ML), Battery (BA), Charge station (CS), Price (PR), Maintenance (MT), At-home charger (HC), Government policy (GP), Promotion (PM), Brand (BR) and one dependent variable- Consumer Factor (CF). 387 sample were collected using electronic questionnaire through social media. We used Structural Equation Models (SEM) for data analysis. The result shows that since the RMSEA, which is an absolute fit index that assesses how far our hypothesized model is from a perfect model, for this model is .04 (<.05) which strongly indicates a "close fit" and the Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) value is .913 (>.90), the model seems to fit well according to the descriptive measures of fit. More importantly, Battery (BA), Charge station (CS), Price (PR), At-home charger (HC), Government policy (GP), and Brand (BR) are significantly defined as key success factors of electric vehicles (EV) from the consumer's perspective due to their p-values are all less than .05. That means if these significant factors are taken good care of from having branded EV with quality battery at a competitive price offering with more charge stations available both in public and at home, all of which are deeply supported by government policy to encourage people to switch over to EV ASAP, EV will become much more successful and widely adopted from consumer standpoint much faster than what has been happening so far.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumas Wongsunopparat & Peter Cherian, 2023. "Study of Factors Influencing Consumers to adopt EVs (Electric Vehicles)," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(2), pages 155-169, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:155-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/download/21054/16287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/21054
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Dohee & Park, Byung-Jin (Robert), 2017. "The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 439-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeng, Isabella Yunfei & Du, Chenmu & Xiong, Jianliang & Gong, Ting & Wu, Tian, 2024. "Tax policy or carbon emission quota: A theory on traditional ICEV transportation regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    2. Shakir Ullah, 2025. "Intention to Use Cryptocurrencies for Business Transactions: The Case of North Carolina," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. An, Wookhyun & Alarcón, Silverio, 2021. "Rural tourism preferences in Spain: Best-worst choices," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Tsung-Yu Chou, 2022. "A Hybrid FMCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of Homestays," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Lee Yen Chaw & Chun Meng Tang, 2019. "Online accommodation booking: what information matters the most to users?," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 369-390, September.
    4. Li Cong & Yujun Zhang & Ching-Hui (Joan) Su & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Jinnan Wang, 2019. "Understanding Tourists’ Willingness-to-Pay for Rural Landscape Improvement and Preference Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Simonsen, Nick, 2025. "Implementing Discrete Choice Experiments using Ngene and Qualtrics," OSF Preprints rj7yh_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Radu Lixăndroiu & Dana Lupșa-Tătaru, 2023. "Switzerland? The Best Choice for Accommodation in Europe for Skiing in the 2023 Season," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2021. "Inferring customer heterogeneity for rural tourism: A latent class approach based on a best-worst choice modelling," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(7), pages 266-276.
    8. Taneja, Anu & Arora, Anuja, 2019. "Modeling user preferences using neural networks and tensor factorization model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 132-148.
    9. Amanda Belarmino & Tevfik Demirciftci & Liheng Zhang, 2021. "Online reviews and travel magazine awards: their influence on willingness-to-pay," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 436-445, August.
    10. Nam, Youngwon & Lee, Sihyun & Lee, Hoyoung, 2025. "Consumer preferences for unmanned stores: A choice experiment study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:a9wbe_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Karolina Nessel & Szczepan Kościółek & Ewa Wszendybył-Skulska & Sebastian Kopera, 2021. "Benefit segmentation in the tourist accommodation market based on eWOM attribute ratings," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 265-290, June.
    13. Enrique Bigne & Carla Ruiz & Carmen Perez-Cabañero & Antonio Cuenca, 2023. "Are customer star ratings and sentiments aligned? A deep learning study of the customer service experience in tourism destinations," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 281-314, March.
    14. David Boto-García & Petr Mariel & José Baños Pino & Antonio Alvarez, 2022. "Tourists’ willingness to pay for holiday trip characteristics: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(2), pages 349-370, March.
    15. Ma, Jun & Nault, Barrie R. & Tu, Yiliu (Paul), 2023. "Customer segmentation, pricing, and lead time decisions: A stochastic-user-equilibrium perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. Yen-Chieh Chen & Meng-Chien Li & Shou-Der Weng & Yi-Chieh Wang, 2023. "A Descriptive Survey of Atmospheric Music Broadcasting in Hot Spring Hotels and Its Further Marketing Strategy," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    17. Min-Yen Chang & Yi-Sheng Hsu & Han-Shen Chen, 2021. "Choice Experiment Method for Sustainable Tourism in Theme Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Isabel P Albaladejo & M Teresa Díaz-Delfa, 2021. "The effects of motivations to go to the country on rural accommodation choice: A hybrid discrete choice model," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1484-1507, November.
    19. Kotzab, Herbert & Yumurtacı Hüseyinoğlu, Işık Özge & Şen, Irmak & Mena, Carlos, 2024. "Exploring home delivery service attributes: Sustainability versus delivery expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Qi Chen & Yun Zhang, 2023. "Assessing Tourists’ Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Artificial Beach Park Development and Management: A Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    21. Viglia, Giampaolo & Dolnicar, Sara, 2020. "A review of experiments in tourism and hospitality," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:155-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.