IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v21y1999i4p611-620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gains from Trade in a Ricardian Model When Workers Have Preferences among Occupations

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Tompkinson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Tompkinson, 1999. "The Gains from Trade in a Ricardian Model When Workers Have Preferences among Occupations," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 611-620, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:21:y:1999:i:4:p:611-620
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.1999.11490218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.1999.11490218
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.1999.11490218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thurow, Lester, 1983. "Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198771838.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murray C. Kemp & Koji Shimomura, 2002. "Recent Challenges to the Classical Gains–from–Trade Proposition," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 3(4), pages 485-489, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John H Goldthorpe, 2014. "The role of education in intergenerational social mobility: Problems from empirical research in sociology and some theoretical pointers from economics," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 265-289, August.
    2. Stretton, Hugh, 1996. "After Samuelson?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(10), pages 1561-1578, October.
    3. Michael S. Lawlor & William A. Darity & Bobbie L. Horn, 1987. "Was Keynes a Chapter Two Keynesian?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 516-528, July.
    4. Sue O'Keefe & Lin Crase, 2007. "Public sector workers' willingness to pay for education and training: a comparison," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 10(4), pages 279-294.
    5. Jochen Hartwig, 2014. "Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output," KOF Working papers 14-355, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    6. Rudi Wielers, 1997. "The Wages Of Trust," Rationality and Society, , vol. 9(3), pages 351-371, August.
    7. Nadia Oliva & Andrea Pacella, 2016. "Does Firms¡¯ Social Responsibility Counteract Some Critical Effects of Labor Market Flexibility?," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 109-120, March.
    8. Mark Nixon, 2007. "Satisfaction for Whom? Freedom for What? Theology and the Economic Theory of the Consumer," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 39-60, January.
    9. Irina SyssoyevaMasson & João Sousa Andrade, 2017. "Are PIIGS so Different? An Empirical Analysis of Demand and Supply Shocks," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 64(2), pages 189-222, March.
    10. Judith Sloan & Mark Wooden, 1984. "Labour Markets form the Microeconomic perspective: Implicit Contract Theory," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 17(3), pages 120-129, November.
    11. Stuart Birks, 2012. "Rethinking economics: Logical gaps – empirical to the real world," Working Papers 20121217, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    12. Audrey Dumas & Saïd Hanchane, 2008. "Qualité de la formation professionnelle initiale au Maroc et impact des actions de formation continue sur les performances des entreprises marocaines," Working Papers halshs-00382948, HAL.
    13. Muysken, J. & Mitchell, W.F., 2009. "Full employment abandoned: shifting sands and policy failures," Research Memorandum 006, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    14. João Sousa Andrade, 2009. "The PIGS, does the Group Exist? An empirical macroeconomic analysis based on the Okun Law," GEMF Working Papers 2009-11, GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    15. Templet, Paul H., 1995. "Grazing the commons: an empirical analysis of externalities, subsidies and sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 141-159, February.
    16. Cristian Dario Castillo Robayo & Julimar Da Silva Bichara & Manuel Pérez-Trujillo, 2017. "Retornos salariales para Colombia, un análisis cuantílico," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 36(63), pages 211-246, January.
    17. L. A. Duhs, 1985. "Why Economists Disagree: The Political Economy of Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 252-255, March.
    18. Bruce J. Chapman, 1984. "Comment: on ‘Labour Markets from the Microeconomic Perspective: Implicit Contract Theory’," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 17(3), pages 132-134, November.
    19. D. T. Nguyen & A. Mahinda Siriwardana, 1988. "The Relationship Between Output Growth and Unemployment: A Re‐examination of Okun's Law in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 21(1), pages 16-27, March.
    20. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2010. "The Theoretical Foundation of Industrial Relations and its Implications for Labor Economics and Human Resource Management," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(1), pages 74-108, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:21:y:1999:i:4:p:611-620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.