IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2289.html

A képességszemlélet szerepe a mobilitási lehetőségek igazságos fejlesztésében. Módszeres szakirodalom-elemzés
[The role of the capability approach in the just development of mobility. A systematic review of the literature]

Author

Listed:
  • Bajmócy, Zoltán

  • Dancz, Ákos Gyula

Abstract

Tanulmányunk egy olyan formálódó szakirodalmi irányzatba illeszkedik, amely a közlekedéssel kapcsolatos mobilitásfejlesztés igazságossági szempontjainak elméleti megalapozását kívánja pontosabbá tenni. Módszeres szakirodalom-elemzést alkalmazva tekintjük át Amartya Sen képességszemléletének lehetséges hozzájárulását a mobilitás igazságos fejlesztéséhez. A képességszemlélet egy olyan keretet kínál, amely összekapcsolja a jóllétet és az igazságosságot. A képességszemlélet fontos eleme a fejlesztés eszközei és céljai közti különbségtétel hangsúlyozása, az egyéni jellemzőkben és a mobilitás kontextusában mutatkozó sokféleség figyelembevétele és így a sérülékeny társadalmi csoportok mobilitásból történő kirekesztődésének jobb megértése. Az eddigi kutatások nem használták ki teljeskörűen a képességszemléletben rejlő potenciált: Sen igazságossággal kapcsolatos érvei csak részben szűrődtek át az elemzett munkákba. A tanulmány végén javaslatokat teszünk a képességszemlélet által kínált lehetőségek jobb kiaknázására.

Suggested Citation

  • Bajmócy, Zoltán & Dancz, Ákos Gyula, 2025. "A képességszemlélet szerepe a mobilitási lehetőségek igazságos fejlesztésében. Módszeres szakirodalom-elemzés [The role of the capability approach in the just development of mobility. A systematic ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1245-1266.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2289
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2025.12.1245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2289
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2025.12.1245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luz, Gregorio & da Silva Portugal, Licinio, 2021. "Understanding Transport-Related Social Exclusion Through the Lens of Capabilities Approach," OSF Preprints 4d3uy, Center for Open Science.
    2. McCauley, Darren & Heffron, Raphael, 2018. "Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-7.
    3. Grove, Hannah, 2021. "Ageing as well as you can in place: Applying a geographical lens to the capability approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Vilja Johansson, 2023. "Just Transition as an Evolving Concept in International Climate Law," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 229-249.
    5. Amartya Sen, 2004. "Capabilities, Lists, And Public Reason: Continuing The Conversation," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 77-80.
    6. Vecchio, Giovanni, 2020. "Microstories of everyday mobilities and opportunities in Bogotá: A tool for bringing capabilities into urban mobility planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. repec:osf:osfxxx:4d3uy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Smith, Noel & Hirsch, Donald & Davis, Abigail, 2012. "Accessibility and capability: the minimum transport needs and costs of rural households," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 93-101.
    9. Lucas, Karen, 2012. "Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 105-113.
    10. Deka, Devajyoti, 2022. "Trip deprivation among older adults in the context of the capability approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Ingrid Robeyns, 2005. "The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 93-117.
    12. Maria Abreu & Flavio Comim & Calvin Jones, 2024. "A capability-approach perspective on regional development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 2208-2220, November.
    13. Amartya Sen, 1999. "The Possibility of Social Choice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(3), pages 349-378, June.
    14. Giovanni Vecchio & Karel Martens, 2021. "Accessibility and the Capabilities Approach: a review of the literature and proposal for conceptual advancements," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 833-854, November.
    15. Fleischer, Tamás, 2019. "Városi mobilitás, közjavak, fenntarthatóság [Urban mobility, public goods and sustainability]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1056-1072.
    16. Sen, Amartya, 1979. "The Welfare Basis of Real Income Comparisons: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-45, March.
    17. Azmoodeh, Mohammad & Haghighi, Farshidreza & Motieyan, Hamid, 2023. "The capability approach and social equity in transport: Understanding factors affecting capabilities of urban residents, using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 137-151.
    18. Damart, Sébastien & Roy, Bernard, 2009. "The uses of cost-benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 200-212, August.
    19. Szemere, Dorottya & Surman, Vivien, 2025. "Az elektromos rollerek integrációjának vizsgálata Magyarországon [The integration of electric scooters in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 312-327.
    20. Cao, Mengqiu & Hickman, Robin, 2019. "Understanding travel and differential capabilities and functionings in Beijing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 46-56.
    21. Hananel, Ravit & Berechman, Joseph, 2016. "Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 78-85.
    22. Ryszard Barcik & Leszek Bylinko, 2018. "Transportation Demand Management As A Tool Of Transport Policy," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(2), pages 121-131, June.
    23. Ricz, Judit & Deák, Ágnes, 2022. "A többdimenziós szegénység mérése - latin-amerikai tapasztalatok [Measurement of multidimensional poverty: Latin American experiences]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 389-412.
    24. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    25. Bantis, Thanos & Haworth, James, 2020. "Assessing transport related social exclusion using a capabilities approach to accessibility framework: A dynamic Bayesian network approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    26. Marco van Burgsteden & Anna Grigolon & Karst Geurs, 2024. "Improving Community Wellbeing through transport policy: a literature review and theoretical framework, based on the Capability Approach," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1161-1186, November.
    27. Ryan, Jean & Wretstrand, Anders & Schmidt, Steven M., 2019. "Disparities in mobility among older people: Findings from a capability-based travel survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 177-192.
    28. Kita, Hideyuki & Komoda, Satoshi & Ozaki, Rizumu, 2024. "A quantified planning method of local public transport services for expanding residents’ activity opportunities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 284-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azmoodeh, Mohammad & Haghighi, Farshidreza & Motieyan, Hamid, 2023. "The capability approach and social equity in transport: Understanding factors affecting capabilities of urban residents, using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 137-151.
    2. Santiago Barreno-Alcalde & Francisco Diez-Martin & Sandra Escamilla-Solano, 2024. "The Multidisciplinary Nature of the Capability Approach: Emerging Trends and Future Research Directions Through a Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    3. Mohammad Azmoodeh & Farshidreza Haghighi & Hamid Motieyan, 2023. "Capability Index: Applying a Fuzzy-Based Decision-Making Method to Evaluate Social Inclusion in Urban Areas Using the Capability Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 77-105, January.
    4. Mouter, Niek & Mulder, Jetske & de Vries, Martijn Olivier, 2025. "How do citizens prioritize the accessibility goals of the Dutch national government against other transport goals? Results of a Participatory Value Evaluation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Luz, Gregorio & Barboza, Matheus Henrique Cunha & da Silva Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the City of São Paulo, Brazil," SocArXiv 2p896, Center for Open Science.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:2p896_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Edward Randal & Caroline Shaw & Alistair Woodward & Philippa Howden-Chapman & Alex Macmillan & Jamie Hosking & Ralph Chapman & Andrew M. Waa & Michael Keall, 2020. "Fairness in Transport Policy: A New Approach to Applying Distributive Justice Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Cooper, Erin & Vanoutrive, Thomas, 2022. "Is accessibility inequality morally relevant?: An exploration using local residents' assessments in Modesto, California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Luz, Gregório & Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the city of São Paulo, Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 186-217.
    10. Deka, Devajyoti, 2022. "Trip deprivation among older adults in the context of the capability approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Antoinette Baujard, 2016. "Welfare economics," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III, chapter 42, pages 611-624, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Bantis, Thanos & Haworth, James, 2020. "Assessing transport related social exclusion using a capabilities approach to accessibility framework: A dynamic Bayesian network approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Espeland, Sierra & Rowangould, Dana, 2024. "Rural travel burdens in the United States: Unmet need and travel costs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Felix Johan Pot & Eva Heinen & Taede Tillema, 2025. "Sufficient access? Activity participation, perceived accessibility and transport-related social exclusion across spatial contexts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1679-1707, August.
    15. van Dülmen, Christoph & Šimon, Martin & Klärner, Andreas, 2022. "Transport poverty meets car dependency: A GPS tracking study of socially disadvantaged groups in European rural peripheries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility in Dutch rural areas: Bridging the gap with accessibility based on spatial data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 170-184.
    17. Wang, Donggen & Yang, Min, 2023. "Gendered mobility and activity pattern: implications for gendered mental health," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Roberta Sferrazzo & Renato Ruffini, 2021. "Are Liberated Companies a Concrete Application of Sen’s Capability Approach?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 329-342, May.
    20. Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica & Moroni, Stefano, 2007. "An analytical framework for conceptualizing poverty and re-examining the capability approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 360-375, June.
    21. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Odon Sok to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.